Bipolar Disorder
Bipolar Disorder is a psychiatric condition defined as recurrent episodes of significant disturbance in mood. These disturbances can occur on
a spectrum that ranges from debilitating
depression to unbridled mania. Individuals suffering from bipolar disorder typically experience fluid states
of mania, hypomania or what is referred to as a mixed state in conjunction with depressive episodes. These clinical states typically alternate with a
normal range of mood. The disorder has been subdivided into Bipolar I, Bipolar II and cyclothymia, with both Bipolar I and Bipolar II potentially
presenting with rapid cycling.
Also called
Bipolar Affective Disorder until recently, the current name is of fairly recent origin and refers to the cycling between high and low
episodes; it has replaced the older term
Manic-depressive Illness coined by Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926) in the late 19th century. The new term is
designed to be neutral, to avoid the stigma in the non-mental health community that comes from conflating "manic" and "
depression".
Onset of symptoms generally occurs in young adulthood. Diagnosis is based on the person's self-reported experiences, as well as observed behavior.
Episodes of illness are associated with distress and disruption, and a relatively high risk of suicide. Studies suggest that genetics, early
environment, neurobiology, and psychological and social processes are important contributory factors. Current psychiatric research is focused on the
role of neurobiology, but a clear organic cause has not been found. Bipolar disorder is usually treated with medications and/or therapy or counseling.
The mainstay of medication are a number of drugs termed 'mood stabilizers', in particular lithium and sodium valproate ; these are a group of unrelated
medications used to prevent relapses of further episodes. Antipsychotic medications, sometimes called neuroleptics, in particular olanzapine, are
used in the treatment of manic episodes and in maintenance. The benefits of using antidepressants in depressive episodes is unclear. In serious cases
where there is risk to self and others involuntary hospitalization may be necessary; these generally involve severe manic episodes with dangerous
behaviour or depressive episodes with suicidal ideation. Hospital stays are less frequent and for shorter periods than they were in previous years.
Some studies have suggested a significant correlation between creativity and bipolar disorder. However, the relationship between the disorder and
creativity is still very unclear. One study indicated increased striving for, and sometimes obtaining, goals and achievements.
Current Research
For current research articles click
- here
Signs and Symptoms
Bipolar disorder is a cyclic illness where people periodically exhibit elevated (Manic) and depressive episodes. Most people will experience a number
of episodes, averaging 0.4 to 0.7 a year with each lasting 3-6 months. Late adolescence and early adulthood are peak years for the onset of the
illness. These are critical periods in a young adult's social and vocational development, and they can be severely disrupted by disease onset.
Classification
Bipolar disorder is commonly categorized as either Bipolar Type I, where an individual experiences full-blown mania, or Bipolar Type II, in which the
hypomanic "highs" do not go to the extremes of mania. The latter is much more difficult to diagnose, since the hypomanic episodes may simply appear
as a period of successful high productivity and is reported less frequently than a distressing
depression. Psychosis can occur, particularly in manic
periods. There are also 'rapid cycling' subtypes. Because there is so much variation in the severity and nature of mood-related problems, the concept
of a bipolar spectrum is often employed, which includes cyclothymia. There is no consensus as to how many 'types' of bipolar disorder exist. Many
people with bipolar disorder experience severe
anxiety and are very irritable (to the point of rage) when in a manic state, while others are euphoric
and grandiose.
Depressive Phase
Signs and symptoms of the depressive phase of bipolar disorder include: persistent feelings of sadness,
anxiety, guilt, anger, isolation and/or
hopelessness, disturbances in sleep and appetite, fatigue and loss of interest in usually enjoyed activities, problems concentrating, loneliness,
self-loathing, apathy or indifference, depersonalization, loss of interest in sexual activity, shyness or social anxiety, irritability, chronic pain
(with or without a known cause), lack of motivation, and morbid/suicidal ideation.
Mania
Mania is generally characterized by a distinct period of an elevated, expansive or irritable mood state. People commonly experience an increase in
energy and a decreased need for sleep. A person's speech may be pressured, with thoughts experienced as racing. Attention span is low and a person
in a manic state may be easily distracted. People may feel they have been 'chosen', or are 'on a special mission', which are considered grandiose or
delusional ideas. At more extreme phases, a person in a manic state can begin to experience psychosis, or a break with reality, where thinking is
affected along with mood. In order to be diagnosed with mania according to DSM-IV, a person must experience this state of elevated or irritable mood
as well as other symptoms for two or more weeks.
Hypomania
Hypomania is generally a less extreme state than mania, and people in the hypomanic phase generally experience fewer of the symptoms of mania than
those in a full-blown manic episode. During an episode of Hypomania, one might feel an uncontrollable impulse to laugh at things he or she does not
normally find funny. The duration is usually also shorter than in mania. This is often a very 'artistic' state of the disorder, where there is a flight
of ideas, extremely clever thinking, and an increase in energy.
Mixed State
In the context of bipolar disorder, a mixed state is a condition during which symptoms of mania and clinical
depression occur simultaneously (for
example, agitation,
anxiety, aggressiveness or belligerence, confusion, fatigue, impulsiveness,
insomnia, irritability, morbid and/or suicidal
ideation, panic, paranoia, persecutory delusions, pressured speech, racing thoughts, restlessness, and rage).
Mixed episodes can be the most volatile of the bipolar states, as moods can easily and quickly be triggered or shifted. Suicide attempts, substance
abuse, and self-mutilation may occur during this state.
Rapid Cycling
Rapid cycling, defined as having four or more episodes per year, is found in a significant fraction of patients with bipolar disorder. It has been
associated with greater disability or a worse prognosis, due to the confusing changeability and difficulty in establishing a stable state. Rapid
cycling can be induced or made worse by antidepressants, unless there is adjunctive treatment with a mood stabilizer.
The definition of rapid cycling most frequently cited in the literature is that of Dunner and Fieve: at least four major depressive, manic, hypomanic
or mixed episodes are required to have occurred during a 12-month period. There are references that describe very rapid (ultra-rapid) or extremely
rapid (ultra-ultra or ultraradian) cycling. One definition of ultra-ultra rapid cycling is defining distinct shifts in mood within a 24-48 hour
period.
Cognition
Recent studies have found that bipolar disorder involves certain cognitive deficits or impairments, even in states of remission.
Deborah Yurgelun-Todd of McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts has argued these deficits should be included as a core feature of bipolar disorder.
According to McIntyre et al. (2006).
Study results now press the point that neurocognitive deficits are a primary feature of BD; they are highly prevalent and persist in the absence of
overt symptomatology. Although disparate neurocognitive abnormalities have been reported, disturbances in attention, visual memory, and executive
function are most consistently reported.
However, in the April-June 2007 issue of the Journal of Psychiatric Research, Spanish researchers reported that people with bipolar 1 who have a
history of psychotic symptoms do not necessarily experience an increase in cognitive impairment.
Creativity
A number of recent studies have observed a correlation between creativity and bipolar disorder, although it is unclear in which direction the cause
lies, or whether both conditions are caused by some third, unknown, factor. It has been hypothesized that temperament may be one such factor.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is based on the self-reported experiences of the patient as well as abnormalities in behavior reported by family members, friends or
co-workers, followed by secondary signs observed by a psychiatrist, social worker, clinical psychologist or other clinician in a clinical assessment.
There is a list of criteria that must be met for someone to be so diagnosed. These depend on both the presence and duration of certain signs and
symptoms.
An initial assessment includes a comprehensive history and physical examination by a physician. Although there are no biological tests which confirm
bipolar disorder, tests are carried out to exclude medical illnesses which may rarely present with psychiatric symptoms. These include blood tests
measuring TSH to exclude hypo- or hyperthyroidism, basic electrolytes and serum calcium to rule out a metabolic disturbance, full blood count
including ESR to rule out a systemic infection or chronic disease, and serology to exclude syphilis or
HIV infection; two commonly ordered investigations
are EEG to exclude
epilepsy, and a CT scan of the head to exclude brain lesions. There are several psychiatric illnesses which may
present with similar symptoms; these include
schizophrenia, drug intoxication, brief drug-induced psychosis, schizophreniform disorder and
borderline personality disorder.
The last is important as both diagnoses involve symptoms commonly known as "mood swings". In bipolar disorder, the term refers to the cyclic episodes
of elevated and depressed mood which generally last weeks or months (notwithstanding Rapid Cycling variant of greater than four episodes a year). The
term in borderline personality refers to the marked lability and reactivity of mood, known as emotional dysregulation, due to response to external
psychosocial and intrapsychic stressors; these may arise or subside suddenly and dramatically and last for seconds, minutes, hours or days. A bipolar
depression is generally more pervasive with sleep, appetite disturbance and nonreactive mood, whereas the mood in dysthymia of borderline personality
remains markedly reactive and sleep disturbance not acute.
The relationship between bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder has been debated; some hold that the latter represents a subthreshold
form of affective disorder,[24][25] while others maintain the distinctness, though noting they often coexist.
Investigations are not generally repeated for relapse unless there is a specific medical indication. These may include serum BSL if olanzapine has
previously been prescribed, lithium or valproate level to check compliance or toxicity with those medications, renal or thyroid function if lithium
has been previously prescribed and taken regularly. Assessment and treatment are usually done on an outpatient basis; admission to an inpatient
facility is considered if there is a risk to self or others.
The most widely used criteria for diagnosing bipolar disorder are from the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, the current version being DSM-IV-TR, and the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and
Related Health Problems, currently the ICD-10. The latter criteria are typically used in European countries while the DSM criteria are used in the
USA or the rest of the world, as well as prevailing in research studies.
Diagnostic criteria
Flux is the fundamental nature of bipolar disorder. Both within and between individuals with the illness, energy, mood, thought, sleep, and
activity are among the continually changing biological markers of the disorder. The diagnostic subtypes of bipolar disorder are thus static
descriptions—snapshots, perhaps—of an illness in continual change, with a great diversity of symptoms and varying degrees of severity. Individuals
may stay in one subtype, or change into another, over the course of their illness. The DSM V, to be published in 2011 , will likely include
further and more accurate sub-typing (Akiskal and Ghaemi, 2006).
There are currently four types of bipolar illness. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-TR (DSM-IV-TR) details four categories
of bipolar disorder, Bipolar I, Bipolar II, Cyclothymia, and Bipolar Disorder NOS (Not Otherwise Specified).
For a diagnosis of
Bipolar I disorder according to the DSM-IV-TR, there requires one or more manic or mixed episodes. A depressive episode is not
required for the diagnosis of Bipolar I disorder but it frequently occurs.
Bipolar II, which occurs more frequently is usually characterized by at least one episode of hypomania and at least one
depression.
A diagnosis of Cyclothymic Disorder requires the presence of numerous hypomanic episodes, intermingled with depressive episodes that do not meet full
criteria for major depressive episodes. The main idea here is that there is a low-grade cycling of mood which appears to the observer as a personality
trait, but interferes with functioning.
If an individual clearly seems to be suffering from some type of bipolar disorder but does not meet the criteria for one of the subtypes above, he or
she receives a diagnosis of
Bipolar Disorder NOS (Not Otherwise Specified).
Although a patient will most likely be depressed when they first seek help, it is very important to find out from the patient or the patient's family
or friends if a manic or hypomanic episode has ever been present, using careful questioning. This will prevent misdiagnosis of Depressive Disorder
and avoids the use of an antidepressant which may trigger a "switch" to hypomania or mania or induce rapid cycling. Recent screening tools such as the
Hypomanic Check List Questionnaire (HCL-32) have been developed to assist the quite often difficult detection of Bipolar II disorders.
Delay in Diagnosis
The behavioral manifestations of bipolar disorder are often not understood by patients nor recognized by mental health professionals, so people may
suffer unnecessarily for over 10 years in some cases before receiving proper treatment.
That treatment lag is apparently not decreasing, even though there is now increased public awareness of this mental health condition in popular
magazines and health websites. Recent TV specials, for example the BBC's The Secret Life of the Manic Depressive, MTV's True Life: I'm Bipolar,
talk shows, and public radio shows, and the greater willingness of public figures to discuss their own bipolar disorder, have focused on psychiatric
conditions thereby further raising public awareness.
Despite this increased focus, individuals are still commonly misdiagnosed.
Children
Children with bipolar disorder do not often meet the strict DSM-IV definition. In pediatric cases, the cycling can occur very quickly (see section
above on rapid cycling).
Children with bipolar disorder tend to have rapid-cycling or mixed-cycling. Rapid cycling occurs when the cycles between
depression and mania occur
quickly, sometimes within the same day or the same hour. When the symptoms of both mania and depression occur simultaneously, mixed cycling occurs.
Often other psychiatric conditions are diagnosed in bipolar children. These other diagnoses may be concurrent problems, or they may be misdiagnosed
as bipolar disorder.
Depression,
ADHD, ODD,
schizophrenia, and Tourette syndrome are common comorbid conditions. Furthermore some children with
histories of abuse or neglect may have Bipolar I Disorder. There is a high comorbidity between Reactive attachment disorder and Bipolar I Disorder
with about 50% of children in the Child Welfare System who have Reactive Attachment Disorder also have Bipolar I Disorder.
Misdiagnosis can lead to incorrect medication.
On September, 2007, experts (from New York, Maryland and Madrid) found that the number of American children and adolescents treated for bipolar
disorder increased 40-fold from 1994 to 2003, and it was increasing ever since. However, the increase was due to the fact that doctors more
aggressively applied the diagnosis to children, and not that the incidence of the disorder had increased. The study calculated the number of visits
which increased, from 20,000 in 1994 to 800,000 in 2003, or 1% of the population under age 20.
Epidemiology
Clinical
depression and bipolar disorder are currently classified as separate illnesses. Some researchers increasingly view them as part of an overlapping
spectrum that also includes
anxiety and psychosis.
According to Hagop Akiskal, M.D., at the one end of the spectrum is bipolar type schizoaffective disorder, and at the other end is unipolar
depression
(recurrent or not recurrent), with the
anxiety disorders present across the spectrum. Also included in this view is premenstrual dysphoric disorder,
postpartum
depression, and postpartum psychosis. This view helps to explain why many people who have the illness do not have first-degree relatives
with clear-cut "bipolar disorder", but who have family members with a history of these other disorders.
In a 2003 study, Hagop Akiskal M.D. and Lew Judd M.D. re-examined data from the landmark Epidemiologic Catchment Area study from two decades before.
The original study found that 0.8 percent of the population surveyed had experienced a manic episode at least once (the diagnostic threshold for bipolar
I) and 0.5 a hypomanic episode (the diagnostic threshold for bipolar II).
By tabulating survey responses to include sub-threshold diagnostic criteria, such as one or two symptoms over a short time-period, the authors arrived
at an additional 5.1 percent of the population, adding up to a total of 6.4 percent of the entire population who can be thought of as having a bipolar
spectrum disorder. This and similar recent studies have been interpreted by some prominent bipolar disorders researchers as evidence for a much higher
prevalence of bipolar conditions in the general population than previously thought.
However these re-analyses should be interpreted cautiously because of substantive as well as methodological study limitations. Indeed, prevalence
studies of bipolar disorder are carried out by lay interviewers (that is, not by expert clinicians/psychiatrists who are more costly to employ) who
follow fully structured/fixed interview schemes; responses to single items from such interviews may suffer limited validity.
Furthermore, a well-known statistical problem arises when ascertaining disorders and conditions with a relatively low population prevalence or base-rate,
such as bipolar disorder: even assuming that lay interviews diagnoses are highly accurate in terms of sensitivity and specificity and their corresponding
area under the ROC curve (that is, AUC, or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), a condition with a relatively low prevalence or
base-rate is bound to yield high false positive rates, which exceed false negative rates; in such a circumstance a limited positive predictive value,
PPV, yields high false positive rates even in presence of a specificity which is very close to 100%. To simplify, it can be said that a very small
error applied over a very large number of individuals (that is, those who are *not affected* by the condition in the general population during their
lifetime; for example, over 95%) produces a relevant, non-negligible number of subjects who are incorrectly classified as having the condition or any
other condition which is the object of a survey study: these subjects are the so-called false positives; such reasoning applies to the 'false positive'
but not the 'false negative' problem where we have an error applied over a relatively very small number of individuals to begin with (that is, those
who are *affected* by the condition in the general population; for example, less than 5%). Hence, a very high percentage of subjects who seem to have
a history of bipolar disorder at the interview are false positives for such a medical condition and apparently never suffered a fully clinical syndrome
(that is, bipolar disorder type I): the population prevalence of bipolar disorder type I, which includes at least a lifetime manic episode, continues
to be estimated at 1%. "Mild-to-severe versions of bipolar disorder afflict nearly 4 percent of adults at some time in their lives."
A different but related problem in evaluating the public health significance of psychiatric conditions has been highlighted by Robert Spitzer of
Columbia University: fulfillment of diagnostic criteria and the resulting diagnosis do not necessarily imply need for treatment. As a consequence,
subjects who experience bipolar symptoms but not a full-blown, impairing bipolar syndrome should not be automatically considered as patients in need
of treatment.
Recent studies have indicated that at least 50% of adult sufferers report manifestation of symptoms before the age of 17. Moreover, there is a growing
consensus that bipolar disorder originates in childhood. In young children the illness is now referred to as pediatric bipolar disorder. Today about
0.5% of children under 18 are believed to have the condition. For children, the main concern is that bipolar disorder needs to be diagnosed correctly
and treated properly because it can look like unipolar
depression,
ADHD, or conduct disorder. Young children, adolescents and adults each express the
condition differently according to child and adolescent bipolar disorders expert Demitri Papolos M.D. and the Child and Adolescent Bipolar Foundation.
There is, however, controversy about this last point.
Bipolar disorder manifests in late life as well. Some individuals with "hyperthymic" temperament (or "hypomanic" personality style) who experience
depression in later life appear to have a form of bipolar disorder. Much more needs to be elucidated about late-life bipolar disorder.
Approximately 50% of children in the U.S. child welfare system who have reactive attachment disorder also have comorbid Bipolar I disorder according to
research by John Alston, MD.
Etiology
According to the U.S. government's National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), "There is no single cause for bipolar disorder—rather, many factors
act together to produce the illness." "Because bipolar disorder tends to run in families, researchers have been searching for specific genes passed
down through generations that may increase a person's chance of developing the illness." "In addition, findings from gene research suggest that
bipolar disorder, like other mental illnesses, does not occur because of a single gene.".
It is well established that bipolar disorder is a genetically influenced condition which can respond very well to medication (Johnson & Leahy, 2004;
Miklowitz & Goldstein, 1997; Frank, 2005). (See treatment of bipolar disorder for a more detailed discussion of treatment.)
Psychological factors also play a strong role in both the psychopathology of the disorder and the psychotherapeutic factors aimed at alleviating core
symptoms, recognizing episode triggers, reducing negative expressed emotion in relationships, recognizing prodromal symptoms before full-blown
recurrence, and, practising the factors that lead to maintenance of remission (Lam et al, 1999; Johnson & Leahy, 2004; Basco & Rush, 2005; Miklowitz
& Goldstein, 1997; Frank, 2005). Modern evidence based psychotherapies designed specifically for bipolar disorder when used in combination with
standard medication treatment increase the time the individual stays well significantly longer than medications alone (Frank, 2005). These psychotherapies
are interpersonal and social rhythm therapy for bipolar disorder, family focused therapy for bipolar disorder, psychoeducation, cognitive therapy for
bipolar disorder, and prodrome detection. All except psychoeducation and prodrome detection are available as books.
Abnormalities in brain function have been related to feelings of
anxiety and lower stress resilience. When faced with a very stressful, negative major
life event, such as a failure in an important area, an individual may have his first major
depression. Conversely, when an individual accomplishes a
major achievement he may experience his first hypomanic or manic episode. Individuals with bipolar disorder tend to experience episode triggers
involving either interpersonal or achievement-related life events. An example of interpersonal-life events include falling in love or, conversely,
the death of a close friend. Achievement-related life events include acceptance into an elite graduate school or by contrast, being fired from work
(Miklowitz & Goldstein, 1997). Childbirth can also trigger a postpartum psychosis for bipolar women, which can lead in the worse cases to
infanticide.
The "kindling" theory asserts that people who are genetically predisposed toward bipolar disorder can experience a series of stressful events, each of
which lowers the threshold at which mood changes occur. Eventually, a mood episode can start (and becomes recurrent) by itself. Not all individuals
experience subsequent mood episodes in the absence of positive or negative life events, however.
Individuals with late-adolescent/early adult onset of the disorder will very likely have experienced childhood
anxiety and
depression. Some argue
that childhood-onset bipolar disorder should be treated early.
A family history of bipolar spectrum disorders can impart a genetic predisposition towards developing a bipolar spectrum disorder. Since bipolar
disorders are polygenic (involving many genes), there are apt to be many unipolar and bipolar disordered individuals in the same family pedigree.
This is very often the case (Barondes, 1998).
Anxiety disorders, clinical
depression, eating disorders, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, postpartum
depression, postpartum psychosis and/or
schizophrenia may be part of the patient's family history and reflects a term called "genetic loading".
Bipolar disorder is not either environmental or physiological, it is multifactorial; that is, many genes and environmental factors conspire to create
the disorder (Johnson & Leahy, 2004).
Since bipolar disorder is so heterogeneous, it is likely that people experience different pathways towards the illness (Miklowitz & Goldstein, 1997).
Recent research done in Japan indicates a hypothesis of dysfunctional mitochondria in the brain (Stork & Renshaw, 2005)
Heritability or Inheritance
The disorder runs in families. More than two-thirds of people with bipolar disorder have at least one close relative with the disorder or with
unipolar major
depression.
Studies seeking to identify the genetic basis of bipolar disorder indicate that susceptibility stems from multiple genes. Scientists are continuing
their search for these genes, using advanced genetic analytic methods and large samples of families affected by the illness. The researchers are
hopeful that identification of susceptibility genes for bipolar disorder, and the brain proteins they code for, will make it possible to develop
better treatments and preventive interventions targeted at the underlying illness process.
Genetic research
There is increasing evidence for a genetic component in the causation of bipolar disorder, provided by a number of twin studies and gene linkage
studies.
The monozygotic concordance rate for the disorder is 70%. This means that if a person has the disorder, an identical twin has a 70% likelihood of
having the disorder as well. Dizygotic twins have a 23% concordance rate. These concordance rates are not universally replicated in the literature;
recent studies have shown rates of around 40% for monozygotic and <10% for dizygotic twins (see Kieseppa, 2004 and Cardno, 1999).
In 2003 , a group of American and Canadian researchers published a paper that used gene linkage techniques to identify a mutation in the GRK3 gene
as a possible cause of up to 10% of cases of bipolar disorder. This gene is associated with a kinase enzyme called G protein receptor kinase 3,
which appears to be involved in dopamine metabolism, and may provide a possible target for new drugs for bipolar disorder.
A 2007 gene-linkage study by an international team coordinated by the NIMH has identified a number of genes as likely to be involved in the etiology
of bipolar disorder, suggesting that bipolar disorder may be a polygenic disease. The researchers at NIMH have found a correlation between DGKH
(diacylglycerol kinase eta) and bipolar disorder. The portion of the genome that encodes DGKH, a key protein in the lithium-sensitive phosphatidyl
inositol pathway
Treatment
Currently, bipolar disorder cannot be cured, instead the emphasis of treatment is on effective management of acute episodes and prevention of further
episodes by use of pharmacological and psychotherapeutic techniques.
Hospitalization may occur, especially with manic episodes. This can be voluntary or (if mental health legislation allows it) involuntary (called civil
or involuntary commitment). Long-term inpatient stays are now less common due to deinstitutionalization, although can still occur. Following (or
in lieu of) a hospital admission, support services available can include drop-in centers, visits from members of a community mental health team or
Assertive Community Treatment team, supported employment and patient-led support groups.
Medication
The mainstay of treatment is a mood stabilizer medication; these comprise several unrelated compounds which have been shown to be effective in
preventing relapses of manic, or in the one case, depressive episodes. The first known and current "gold standard" mood stabilizer is lithium, while
almost as widely used is sodium valproate, originally used as an anticonvulsant. Other anticonvulsants used in bipolar disorder include carbamazepine,
reportedly more effective in rapid cycling bipolar disorder, and lamotrigine, which is the first one to be shown to be of benefit in bipolar
depression.
Treatment of the agitation in acute manic episodes has often required the use of antipsychotic medications, such as chlorpromazine, olanzapine and
thioridazine. More recently, olanzapine has been approved as an effective monotherapy for the maintenance of bipolar disorder. A head-to-head
randomized control trial in 2005 has also shown olanzapine monotherapy to be as effective and safe as lithium in prophylaxis.
The use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder has been debated, with some studies reporting a worse outcome with their use. However mood stabilizers
are of limited effectiveness in depressive episodes.
Research
The following studies are ongoing, and are recruiting volunteers:
The Maudsley Bipolar Twin Study, based at the Institute of Psychiatry in London is conducting research about the genetic basis of bipolar disorder
using twin methodology. Currently recruiting volunteers: identical and non-identical twins pairs, where either one or both twins has a diagnosis of
bipolar I or II.
The Maudsley Bipolar eMonitoring Project, another research study based at the Institute of Psychiatry in London, is conducting novel research on
electronic monitoring methodologies (electronic mood diaries and actigraphy) for tracking bipolar symptom fluctuations in Bipolar individuals who
are interested in self-managing their condition. The study is currently recruiting volunteers from all over the world (see Remote eMonitoring).
Medical imaging
Researchers are using advanced brain imaging techniques to examine brain function and structure in people with bipolar disorder, particularly using
the functional MRI and positron emission tomography. An important area of neuroimaging research focuses on identifying and characterizing networks
of interconnected nerve cells in the brain, interactions among which form the basis for normal and abnormal behaviors. Researchers hypothesize that
abnormalities in the structure and/or function of certain brain circuits could underlie bipolar and other mood disorders, and studies have found
anatomical differences in areas such as the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.
Better understanding of the neural circuits involved in regulating mood states, and genetic factors such as the cadherin gene FAT linked to bipolar
disorder, may influence the development of new and better treatments, and may ultimately aid in early diagnosis and even a cure.
New treatments
In late 2003 , researchers at McLean Hospital found tentative evidence of improvements in mood during echo-planar magnetic resonance spectroscopic
imaging (EP-MRSI), and attempts are being made to develop this into a form which can be evaluated as a possible treatment.
NIMH has initiated a large-scale study at 20 sites across the United States to determine the most effective treatment strategies for people with
bipolar disorder. This study, the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD), will follow patients and document their
treatment outcome for 5-8 years. For more information, visit the Clinical Trials page of the NIMH Web site.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation is another fairly new technique being studied.
Prognosis
A good prognosis results from good treatment, which, in turn, results from an accurate diagnosis. Because bipolar disorder continues to have a high
rate of both under-diagnosis and misdiagnosis, it is often difficult for individuals with the condition to receive timely and competent treatment.
Bipolar disorder can be a severely disabling medical condition. However, with appropriate treatment, many individuals with bipolar disorder can live
full and satisfying lives. Persons with bipolar disorder are likely to have periods of normal or near normal functioning between episodes.
Ultimately one's prognosis depends on many factors, which are, in fact, under the individual's control: the right medicines; the right dose of each;
a very informed patient; a good working relationship with a competent medical doctor; a competent, supportive, and warm therapist; a supportive family
or significant other; and a balanced lifestyle including a regulated stress level, regular exercise and regular sleep and wake times.
There are obviously other factors that lead to a good prognosis, as well, such as being very aware of small changes in one's energy, mood, sleep and
eating behaviors, as well as having a plan in conjunction with one's doctor for how to manage subtle changes that might indicate the beginning of a
mood swing. Some people find that keeping a log of their moods can assist them in predicting changes.
Recurrence
Even when on medication, some people may still experience weaker episodes, or have a complete manic or depressive episode. In fact, a recent study
found bipolar disorder to be "characterized by a low rate of recovery, a high rate of recurrence, and poor interepisodic functioning." Worse, the
study confirmed the seriousness of the disorder as "the standardized all-cause mortality ratio among patients with BD is increased approximately
2-fold." Bipolar disorder is currently regarded "as possibly the most costly category of mental disorders in the United States."
The following behaviors can lead to depressive or manic recurrence:
- Discontinuing or lowering one's dose of medication, without consulting one's physician.
- Being under- or over-medicated. Generally, taking a lower dosage of a mood stabilizer can lead to relapse into mania. Taking a lower
dosage of an antidepressant, may cause the patient to relapse into depression, while higher doses can cause destabilization into
mixed-states or mania.
- Taking hard drugs—recreationally or not—such as cocaine, alcohol, amphetamines, or opiates. These can cause the condition to worsen.
- An inconsistent sleep schedule can destabilize the illness. Too much sleep (possibly caused by medication) can lead to depression, while
too little sleep can lead to mixed states or mania.
- Caffeine can cause destabilization of mood toward irritability, dysphoria, and mania. Anecdotal evidence seems to suggest that lower
dosages of caffeine can have effects ranging from anti-depressant to mania-inducing.
- Inadequate stress management and poor lifestyle choices. If unmedicated, excessive stress can cause the individual to relapse. Medication
raises the stress threshold somewhat, but too much stress still causes relapse.
- Often bipolar individuals are subject to self-medication, the most common drugs being alcohol, and marijuana. Sometimes they may also
turn to hard drugs. Studies show that tobacco smoking induces a calming effect on most bipolar people, and a very high percentage
suffering from the disorder smoke.
Recurrence can be managed by the sufferer with the help of a close friend, based on the occurrence of idiosyncratic prodromal events That is, by
noticing which moods, activities / behaviours or thinking process / thought content typically occur at the outset of their episodes. They can then
take planned steps to slow or reverse the onset of illness, or take action to prevent the episode causing damage to important aspects of their life.
Mortality
"Mortality studies have documented an increase in all-cause mortality in patients with BD. A newly established and rapidly growing database indicates
that mortality due to chronic medical disorders (eg, cardiovascular disease) is the single largest cause of premature and excess deaths in BD. The
standardized mortality ratio from suicide in BD is estimated to be approximately 18 to 25, further emphasizing the lethality of the disorder."
Although many people with bipolar disorder who attempt suicide never actually complete it, the annual average suicide rate in males and females with
diagnosed bipolar disorder (0.4%) is 10 to more than 20 times that in the general population.
Individuals with bipolar disorder tend to become suicidal, especially during mixed states such as dysphoric mania and agitated
depression. Persons
suffering from Bipolar II have high rates of suicide compared to persons suffering from other mental health conditions, including Major Depression.
Major Depressive episodes are part of the Bipolar II experience, and there is evidence that sufferers of this disorder spend proportionally much
more of their life in the depressive phase of the illness than their counterparts with Bipolar I Disorder (Akiskal & Kessler, 2007).
History
Varying moods and energy levels have been a part of the human experience since time immemorial. The words "melancholia" (an old word for depression)
and "mania" have their etymologies in Ancient Greek. The word melancholia is derived from melas/μελας, meaning "black", and chole/χολη, meaning "bile"
or "gall",[65] indicative of the term’s origins in pre-Hippocratic humoral theories. Within the humoral theories, mania was viewed as arising from an
excess of yellow bile, or a mixture of black and yellow bile. The linguistic origins of mania, however, are not so clear-cut. Several etymologies are
proposed by the Roman physician Caelius Aurelianus, including the Greek word ‘ania’, meaning to produce great mental anguish, and ‘manos’, meaning
relaxed or loose, which would contextually approximate to an excessive relaxing of the mind or soul (Angst and Marneros 2001). There are at least
five other candidates, and part of the confusion surrounding the exact etymology of the word mania is its varied usage in the pre-Hippocratic poetry
and mythologies (Angst and Marneros 2001).
The idea of a relationship between mania and melancholia can be traced back to at least the 2nd century AD. Soranus of Ephesus (98-177 AD) described
mania and melancholia as distinct diseases with separate etiologies; however, he acknowledged that “many others consider melancholia a form of the
disease of mania” (Cited in Mondimore 2005 p.49).
A clear understanding of bipolar disorder as a mental illness was recognized by early Chinese authors. The encyclopedist Gao Lian (c. 1583) describes
the malady in his Eight Treatises on the Nurturing of Life (Ts'un-sheng pa-chien).
The earliest written descriptions of a relationship between mania and melancholia are attributed to Aretaeus of Cappadocia. Aretaeus was an eclectic
medical philosopher who lived in Alexandria somewhere between 30 and 150 AD (Roccatagliata 1986; Akiskal 1996). Aretaeus is recognized as having
authored most of the surviving texts referring to a unified concept of manic-depressive illness, viewing both melancholia and mania as having a
common origin in ‘black bile’ (Akiskal 1996; Marneros 2001).
The contemporary psychiatric conceptualisation of manic-depressive illness is typically traced back to the 1850s. Marneros (2001) describes the
concepts emerging out of this period as the “rebirth of bipolarity in the modern era”. On January 31, 1854, Jules Baillarger described to the French
Imperial Academy of Medicine a biphasic mental illness causing recurrent oscillations between mania and
depression. Two weeks later, on February
14, 1854, Jean-Pierre Falret presented a description to the Academy on what was essentially the same disorder. This illness was designated folie
circulaire (‘circular insanity’) by Falret, and folie à double forme (‘dual-form insanity’) by Baillarger (Sedler 1983).
Emil Kraepelin (1856-1926), a German psychiatrist categorized and studied the natural course of untreated bipolar patients long before mood stabilizers
were discovered. Describing these patients in 1902, he coined the term manic depressive psychosis. He noted in his patient observations that intervals
of acute illness, manic or depressive, were generally punctuated by relatively symptom-free intervals in which the patient was able to function
normally.
After World War II, Dr. John Cade, an Australian psychiatrist, was investigating the effects of various compounds on veteran patients with manic
depressive psychosis. In 1949 , Cade discovered that lithium carbonate could be used as a successful treatment of manic depressive psychosis. Because
there was a fear that table salt substitutes could lead to toxicity or death, Cade's findings did not immediately lead to treatments. In the 1950s,
U.S. hospitals began experimenting with lithium on their patients. By the mid-'60s, reports started appearing in the medical literature regarding
lithium's effectiveness. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration did not approve of lithium's use until 1970.
The term "manic-depressive reaction" appeared in the first American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic Manual in 1952, influenced by the legacy of
Adolf Meyer who had introduced the paradigm illness as a reaction of biogenetic factors to psychological and social influences. Subclassification of
bipolar disorder was first proposed by German psychiatrist Karl Leonhard in 1957; he was also the first to introduce the terms bipolar (for those
with mania) and unipolar (for those with depressive episodes only).
In 1968, both the newly revised classification systems ICD-8 and DSM-II termed the condition "manic-depressive illness" as biological thinking came
to the fore.
The current nosology, bipolar disorder, became popular only recently, and some individuals prefer the older term because it provides a better
description of a continually changing multi-dimensional illness.
(adapted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipolar_Disorder)
Authors: Moreno C, Laje G, Blanco C, Jiang H, Schmidt AB, Olfson M.
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032. mo49@columbia.edu.
CONTEXT: Although bipolar disorder may have its onset during childhood, little is known about national trends in the diagnosis and management of
bipolar disorder in young people. OBJECTIVES: To present national trends in outpatient visits with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and to compare
the treatment provided to youth and adults during those visits. DESIGN: We compare rates of growth between 1994-1995 and 2002-2003 in visits with
a bipolar disorder diagnosis by individuals aged 0 to 19 years vs those aged 20 years or older. For the period of 1999 to 2003, we also compare
demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of youth and adult bipolar disorder visits. SETTING: Outpatient visits to physicians in
office-based practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patient visits from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (1999-2003) with a bipolar disorder diagnosis
(n = 962). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visits with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder by youth (aged 0-19 years) and by adults (aged >/= 20 years).
RESULTS: The estimated annual number of youth office-based visits with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder increased from 25 (1994-1995) to 1003
(2002-2003) visits per 100 000 population, and adult visits with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder increased from 905 to 1679 visits per 100 000
population during this period. In 1999 to 2003, most youth bipolar disorder visits were by males (66.5%), whereas most adult bipolar disorder
visits were by females (67.6%); youth were more likely than adults to receive a comorbid diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
(32.2% vs 3.0%, respectively; P < .001); and most youth (90.6%) and adults (86.4%) received a psychotropic medication during bipolar disorder
visits, with comparable rates of mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and antidepressants prescribed for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: There has been
a recent rapid increase in the diagnosis of youth bipolar disorder in office-based medical settings. This increase highlights a need for clinical
epidemiological reliability studies to determine the accuracy of clinical diagnoses of child and adolescent bipolar disorder in community
practice.
Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;64(9):1032-9
Authors: Miklowitz DJ, Otto MW, Frank E, Reilly-Harrington NA, Kogan JN, Sachs GS, Thase ME, Calabrese JR, Marangell LB,
Ostacher MJ, Patel J, Thomas MR, Araga M, Gonzalez JM, Wisniewski SR.
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Muenzinger Building, Boulder, CO 80309-0345. miklow@psych.colorado.edu.
OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial interventions are effective adjuncts to pharmacotherapy in delaying recurrences of bipolar disorder; however, to date their
effects on life functioning have been given little attention. In a randomized trial, the authors examined the impact of intensive psychosocial
treatment plus pharmacotherapy on the functional outcomes of patients with bipolar disorder over the 9 months following a depressive episode. METHOD:
Participants were 152 depressed outpatients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder in the multisite Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for
Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study. All patients received pharmacotherapy. Eighty-four patients were randomly assigned to intensive psychosocial
intervention (30 sessions over 9 months of interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, cognitive behavior therapy [CBT], or family-focused therapy),
and 68 patients were randomly assigned to collaborative care (a 3-session psychoeducational treatment). Independent evaluators rated the four
subscales of the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation-Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE-RIFT) (relationships, satisfaction with
activities, work/role functioning, and recreational activities) through structured interviews given at baseline and every 3 months over a 9-month
period. RESULTS: Patients in intensive psychotherapy had better total functioning, relationship functioning, and life satisfaction scores over 9
months than patients in collaborative care, even after pretreatment functioning and concurrent
scores were covaried. No effects of
psychosocial intervention were observed on work/role functioning or recreation scores during this 9-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive psychosocial
treatment enhances relationship functioning and life satisfaction among patients with bipolar disorder. Alternate interventions focused on the
specific cognitive deficits of individuals with bipolar disorder may be necessary to enhance vocational functioning after a depressive episode.
Journal: Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;164(9):1340-7.
Authors: Collins JC, McFarland BH.
Department of Psychiatry, CR-139, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, United States; Addictions and Mental Health Division,
Department of Human Services, State of Oregon, Salem, Oregon 97301, United States.
BACKGROUND: Suicide completion and attempted suicide are major concerns for people with bipolar disorder. Studies in the private sector have suggested
that lithium treatment may be superior to divalproex therapy with regard to minimizing suicidal behavior among individuals with bipolar disorder.
However, few data are available regarding Medicaid patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Subjects were 12,662 Oregon Medicaid patients
diagnosed with bipolar disorder and treated with medication between 1998 and 2003. Outcomes measures were completed suicide and emergency department
visits for suicide attempts (including non-fatal poisoning). Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for demographics, co-morbidity, and
concurrent psychotropic medication use. RESULTS: Divalproex was the most common mood stabilizer (used by 33% of subjects) followed by gabapentin
(32%), lithium (25%), and carbamazepine (3%). There were 11 suicide deaths and 79 attempts. Adjusted hazard ratios (versus lithium users) for suicide
attempts were 2.7 for divalproex users (p<0.001), 1.6 for gabapentin users (not significant) and 2.8 for carbamazepine users (not significant).
For suicide deaths, the adjusted hazard ratios were 1.5 for divalproex users (not significant), 2.6 for gabapentin users (p<0.001), and not
available for carbamazepine users. LIMITATIONS: It should be noted that subjects were not assigned at random to medication use, data on prior suicide
attempts were not available, medication use was measured by automated pharmacy records, and duration of mood stabilizer utilization may have been
brief. CONCLUSIONS: Lithium may have a protective effect with regard to suicide attempts among Medicaid patients with bipolar disorder. It remains
unclear whether or not lithium protects these patients against completed suicide.
Journal: J Affect Disord. 2007 Aug 15
Authors: Gogtay N, Ordonez A, Herman DH, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis C, Lenane M, Clasen L, Sharp W, Giedd JN, Jung D,
Nugent Iii TF, Toga AW, Leibenluft E, Thompson PM, Rapoport JL.
Child Psychiatry Branch, NIMH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Background: There are, to date, no pre-post onset longitudinal imaging studies of bipolar disorder at any age. We report the first prospective study
of cortical brain development in pediatric bipolar illness for 9 male children, visualized before and after illness onset. Method: We contrast this
pattern with that observed in a matched group of healthy children as well as in a matched group of 8 children with 'atypical psychosis' who had similar
initial presentation marked by mood dysregulation and transient psychosis (labeled as 'multi-dimensionally impaired' (MDI)) as in the bipolar group,
but have not, to date, developed bipolar illness. Results: Dynamic maps, reconstructed by applying novel cortical pattern matching algorithms, for
the children who became bipolar I showed subtle, regionally specific, bilaterally asymmetrical cortical changes. Cortical GM increased over the left
temporal cortex and decreased bilaterally in the anterior (and sub genual) cingulate cortex. This was seen most strikingly after the illness onset,
and showed a pattern distinct from that seen in childhood onset
. The bipolar neurodevelopmental trajectory was generally shared by the
children who remained with MDI diagnosis without converting to bipolar I, suggesting that this pattern of cortical development may reflect affective
dysregulation (lability) in general. Conclusions: These dynamic trajectories of cortical development may explain age-related disparate findings from
cross-sectional studies of bipolar illness, and suggest the importance of mood disordered non-bipolar control group in future studies.
Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;48(9):852-62.
Authors: Qiu A, Vaillant M, Barta P, Ratnanather JT, Miller MI.
Center for Imaging Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
In neuroimaging studies, spatial normalization and multivariate testing are central problems in characterizing group variation of functions (e.g.,
cortical thickness, curvature, functional response) in an atlas coordinate system across clinical populations. We present a region-of-interest
(ROI)-based analysis framework for detecting such a group variation. This framework includes two main techniques: ROI-based registration via large
deformation diffeomorphic metric surface mapping and a multivariate testing using a Gaussian random field (GRF) model on the cortical surface
constructed by the eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltramioperator. We compared our GRF statistical model with a pointwise hypothesis testing
approach, whose P-value is corrected using false discovery rate or random field theory at several smoothness scales. As an illustration, we applied
this framework to a clinical study of the cortical thickness of the left planum temporale (PT) in subjects with psychotic bipolar disorder,
, and healthy comparison controls. Our results show that the anterior portion of the left PT is thinner in the psychotic bipolar and
schizophrenic groups than in the healthy control group, and the posterior portion of the left PT shows the reversal finding. Moreover, there may
be a greater thickness variation in the left PT in psychotic bipolar patients when compared with that in schizophrenic patients. Hum Brain Mapp,
2007. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Journal: Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Aug 17
Authors: Fagiolini A, Frank E, Rucci P, Cassano GB, Turkin S, Kupfer DJ.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Objectives: Latent class analysis of demographic and clinical variables can help identify subtypes of patients with bipolar disorder type I (BD
I). Classification of patients into clinically relevant and homogeneous subtypes may have implications for further research. We examine the
structure of mood and
spectrum features in patients with BD I to identify subtypes with similar profiles. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed
with BD I, who were also participants in the Bipolar Disorder Center for Pennsylvanians (BDCP) Study, were followed for a median time of 448 days.
Data from self-report instruments of BD I patients were used to derive dichotomous indicators of four spectrum conditions. Latent class analysis
was applied to these indicators. Demographic and clinical variables were used as external validators of the classes. Results: A 3-class solution
provided a satisfactory data fit and outlined three classes of subjects. Members of the three groups differed in terms of demographic and clinical
variables, such as gender, age of onset, mean Clinical Global Impression (CGI) depressive ratings and overall CGI ratings at entry, weighted mean
CGI ratings for the period between the first and last evaluation in the BDCP Study and mean Global Assessment of Functioning scores at entry and
during the BDCP Study. Conclusions: We found substantial clinical heterogeneity among individuals with BD I and found that the levels of lifetime
depressive, manic, panic-agoraphobic, and obsessive-compulsive spectrum symptoms identify three distinct subtypes characterized by differences in
demographic and clinical variables. These results may have implications for research on the neurobiology, genetics, and treatment of BD I.
Journal: Bipolar Disord. 2007 Aug;9(5):462-7.
Authors: Kilbourne AM, Rofey DL, McCarthy JF, Post EP, Welsh D, Blow FC.
Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion; Departments of Medicine, and Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh
School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Objectives: There have been few comprehensive studies of nutrition and exercise behaviors among patients with bipolar disorder (BPD). Based on a
national sample of patients receiving care in the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, we compared nutrition and exercise behaviors among
individuals diagnosed with BPD, others diagnosed with
, and others who did not receive diagnoses of serious mental illness (SMI).
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients who completed the VA's Large Health Survey of Veteran Enrollees section on health and
nutrition in fiscal year (FY) 1999 and who either received a diagnosis of BPD (n = 2,032) or
(n = 1,895), or were included in a
random sample of non-SMI VA patients (n = 3,065). We compared nutrition and exercise behaviors using multivariable logistic regression, controlling
for patient socio-economic and clinical factors, and adjusting for patients clustered by site using generalized estimating equations. Results:
Patients with BPD were more likely to report poor exercise habits, including infrequent walking (odds ratio, OR = 1.33, p < 0.001) or strength
exercises (OR = 1.28, p < 0.001) than those with no SMI. They were also more likely to self-report suboptimal eating behaviors, including
having fewer than two daily meals (OR = 1.32, p < 0.001) and having difficulty obtaining or cooking food (OR = 1.48, p < 0.001). Patients
with BPD were also more likely to report having gained >/=10 pounds in the past 6 months (OR = 1.59, p < 0.001) and were the least likely
to report that their health care provider discussed their eating habits (OR = 0.84, p < 0.05) or physical activity (OR = 0.81, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Greater efforts are needed to reduce the risk of poor nutrition and exercise habits among patients diagnosed with BPD.
Journal: Bipolar Disord. 2007 Aug;9(5):443-52.
- Become a free member and get notified about studies in your area when they become available.
- Look over all of our current studies being conducted throughout the United States.