Cancer
Cancer is a class of diseases or disorders characterized by uncontrolled division of cells and the ability of these cells
to spread, either by direct growth into adjacent tissue through invasion, or by implantation into distant sites by
metastasis (where cancer cells are transported through the bloodstream or lymphatic system). Cancer may affect people at
all ages, but risk tends to increase with age. It is one of the principal causes of death in developed countries.
There are many types of cancer. Severity of symptoms depends on the site and character of the malignancy and whether there
is metastasis. A definitive diagnosis usually requires the histologic examination of tissue by a pathologist. This tissue
is obtained by biopsy or surgery. Most cancers can be treated and some cured, depending on the specific type, location,
and stage. Once diagnosed, cancer is usually treated with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. As
research develops, treatments are becoming more specific for the type of cancer pathology. Drugs that target specific
cancers already exist for several types of cancer. If untreated, cancers may eventually cause illness and death, though
this is not always the case.
The unregulated growth that characterizes cancer is caused by damage to DNA, resulting in mutations to genes that encode
for proteins controlling cell division. Many mutation events may be required to transform a normal cell into a malignant
cell. These mutations can be caused by radiation, chemicals or physical agents that cause cancer, which are called
carcinogens, or by certain viruses that can insert their DNA into the human genome. Mutations occur spontaneously, and
may be passed down from one cell generation to the next as a result of mutations within germ lines. However, some
carcinogens also appear to work through non-mutagenic pathways that affect the level of transcription of certain genes
without causing genetic mutation.
Many forms of cancer are associated with exposure to environmental factors such as tobacco smoke, radiation, alcohol, and
certain viruses. Some risk factors can be avoided or reduced.
Current Research
For current research articles click
- here
History
Today, the Greek term carcinoma is the medical term for a malignant tumor derived from epithelial cells. It is Celsus who
translated carcinos into the Latin cancer, also meaning crab. Galen used "oncos" to describe all tumours, the root for
the modern word oncology.
Hippocrates described several kinds of cancers. He called benign tumours oncos, Greek for swelling, and malignant tumours
carcinos, Greek for crab or crayfish. This name probably comes from the appearance of the cut surface of a solid malignant
tumour, with a roundish hard center surrounded by pointy projections, vaguely resembling the shape of a crab (see photo).
He later added the suffix -oma, Greek for swelling, giving the name carcinoma. Since it was against Greek tradition to
open the body, Hippocrates only described and made drawings of outwardly visible tumors on the skin, nose, and breasts.
Treatment was based on the humor theory of four bodily fluids (black and yellow bile, blood, and phlegm). According to
the patient's humor, treatment consisted of diet, blood-letting, and/or laxatives. Through the centuries it was discovered
that cancer could occur anywhere in the body, but humor-theory based treatment remained popular until the 19th century
with the discovery of cells.
Though treatment remained the same, in the 16th and 17th centuries it became more acceptable for doctors to dissect bodies
to discover the cause of death. The German professor Wilhelm Fabry believed that breast cancer was caused by a milk clot
in a mammary duct. The Dutch professor Francois de la Boe Sylvius, a follower of Descartes, believed that all disease was
the outcome of chemical processes, and that acidic lymph fluid was the cause of cancer. His contemporary Nicolaes Tulp
believed that cancer was a poison that slowly spreads, and concluded that it was contagious
With the widespread use of the microscope in the 18th century, it was discovered that the 'cancer poison' spread from
the primary tumor through the lymph nodes to other sites ("metastasis"). The use of surgery to treat cancer had poor
results due to problems with hygiene. The renowned Scottish surgeon Alexander Monro saw only 2 breast tumor patients
out of 60 surviving surgery for two years. In the 19th century, asepsis improved surgical hygiene and as the survival
statistics went up, surgical removal of the tumor became the primary treatment for cancer. With the exception of William
Coley who in the late 1800s felt that the rate of cure after surgery had been higher before asepsis (and who injected
bacteria into tumors with mixed results), cancer treatment became dependent on the individual art of the surgeon at
removing a tumor. During the same period, the idea that the body was made up of various tissues, that in turn were made
up of millions of cells, laid rest the humor-theories about chemical imbalances in the body. The age of cellular pathology
was born.
When Marie Curie and Pierre Curie discovered radiation at the end of the 19th century, they stumbled upon the first
effective non-surgical cancer treatment. With radiation came also the first signs of multi-disciplinary approaches to
cancer treatment. The surgeon was no longer operating in isolation, but worked together with hospital radiologists to
help patients. The complications in communication this brought, along with the necessity of the patient's treatment in
a hospital facility rather than at home, also created a parallel process of compiling patient data into hospital files,
which in turn led to the first statistical patient studies.
Cancer patient treatment and studies were restricted to individual physicians' practices until World War II, when medical
research centers discovered that there were large international differences in disease incidence. This insight drove
national public health bodies to make it possible to compile health data across practises and hospitals, a process that
many countries do today. The Japanese medical community observed that the bone marrow of bomb victims in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki was completely destroyed. They concluded that diseased bone marrow could also be destroyed with radiation, and
this led to the discovery of bone marrow transplants for
leukemia
Nomenclature and Classification
The following closely related terms may be used to designate abnormal growths:
- Neoplasia and neoplasm are the scientific designations for cancerous diseases. This group contains a large
number of different diseases. Neoplasms can be benign or malignant.
- Cancer is a widely used word that is usually understood as synonymous with malignant neoplasm. It is
occasionally used instead of carcinoma, a sub-group of malignant neoplasms. Because of its overwhelming
popularity relative to 'neoplasia', it is used frequently instead of 'neoplasia', even by scientists
and physicians, especially when discussing neoplastic diseases as a group.
- Tumor in medical language simply means swelling or lump, either neoplastic, inflammatory or other. In common
language, however, it is synonymous with 'neoplasm', either benign or malignant. This is inaccurate since
some neoplasms usually do not form tumors, for example leukemia or carcinoma in situ.
- Paraneoplasia is a disturbance associated with a neoplasm but not related to the invasion of the primary or
a secondary (metastatic) tumour. Disturbances can be hormonal, neurological, hematological, biochemical
or otherwise clinical.
Cancers are classified by the type of cell that resembles the tumor and, therefore, the tissue presumed to be the origin
of the tumor. The following general categories are usually accepted:
- Carcinoma: malignant tumors derived from epithelial cells. This group represents the most common cancers,
including the common forms of breast, prostate, lung and colon cancer.
- Lymphoma and Leukemia: malignant tumors derived from blood and bone marrow cells
- Sarcoma: malignant tumors derived from connective tissue, or mesenchymal cells
- Mesothelioma: tumors derived from the mesothelial cells lining the peritoneum and the pleura.
- Glioma: tumors derived from glia, the most common type of brain cell
- Germinoma: tumors derived from germ cells, normally found in the testicle and ovary
- Choriocarcinoma: malignant tumors derived from the placenta
Malignant tumors are usually named using the Latin or Greek root of the organ as a prefix and the above category name
as the suffix. For instance, a malignant tumor of liver cells is called hepatocarcinoma; a malignant tumor of the fat
cells is called liposarcoma. For common cancers, the English organ name is used. For instance, the most common type of
breast cancer is called ductal carcinoma of the breast or mammary ductal carcinoma. Here, the adjective ductal refers to
the appearance of the cancer under the microscope, resembling normal breast ducts.
Benign tumors are named using -oma as a suffix with the organ name as the root. For instance, a benign tumor of the smooth
muscle of the uterus is called leiomyoma (the common name of this frequent tumor is fibroid).
Endoscopic
The best test for diagnosis of ulcerative colitis remains endoscopy. Full colonoscopy to the cecum and entry into
the terminal ileum is attempted only if diagnosis of UC is unclear. Otherwise, a flexible sigmoidoscopy is sufficient
to support the diagnosis. The physician may elect to limit the extent of the exam if severe colitis is encountered to
minimize the risk of perforation of the colon. Endoscopic findings in
ulcerative colitis include the following:
- Loss of the vascular appearance of the colon
- Erythema (or redness of the mucosa) and friability of the mucosa
- Superficial ulceration, which may be confluent, and
- Pseudopolyps.
ulcerative colitis is usually continuous from the rectum, with the rectum almost universally being involved. There
is rarely peri-anal disease, but cases have been reported. The degree of involvement endoscopically ranges from
proctitis or inflammation of the rectum, to left sided colitis, to pancolitis, which is inflammation involving the
ascending colon.
Adult Cancers
In the USA and other developed countries, cancer is presently responsible for about 25% of all deaths. On a yearly
basis, 0.5% of the population is diagnosed with cancer.
The statistics below are for adults in the United States, and will vary substantially in other countries:
| MALE | FEMALE |
| Most Common | Cause of Death | Most Common | Cause of Death |
| prostate cancer (33%) | lung cancer (31%) | breast cancer (32%) | lung cancer (27%) |
| lung cancer (13%) | prostate cancer (10%) | lung cancer (12%) | breast cancer (15%) |
| colorectal cancer (10%) | colorectal cancer (10%) | colorectal cancer (11%) | colorectal cancer (10%) |
| bladder cancer (7%) | pancreatic cancer (5%) | endometrial cancer (6%) | ovarian cancer (6%) |
| cutaneous melanoma (5%) | leukemia (4%) | non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (4%) | pancreatic cancer (6%) |
Childhood Cancers
Cancer can also occur in young children and adolescents, but it is rare. Some studies have concluded that pediatric
cancers, especially
leukemia, are on an upward trend.
The age of peak incidence of cancer in children occurs during the first year of life.
Leukemia (usually ALL) is the most
common infant malignancy (30%), followed by the central nervous system cancers and neuroblastoma. The remainder consists
of Wilms' tumor,
lymphomas, rhabdomyosarcoma (arising from muscle), retinoblastoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma.
Female and male infants have essentially the same overall cancer incidence rates, but white infants have substantially
higher cancer rates than black infants for most cancer types. Relative survival for infants is very good for neuroblastoma,
Wilms' tumor and retinoblastoma, and fairly good (80%) for
leukemia, but not for most other types of cancer.
Causes and Pathophysiology
Origins of Cancer
Cell division or cell proliferation is a physiological process that occurs in almost all tissues and under many
circumstances. Normally the balance between proliferation and programmed cell death is tightly regulated to ensure the
integrity of organs and tissues. Mutations in DNA that lead to cancer disrupt these orderly processes.
The uncontrolled and often rapid proliferation of cells can lead to either a benign tumor or a malignant tumor (cancer).
Benign tumors do not spread to other parts of the body or invade other tissues, and they are rarely a threat to life
unless they extrinsically compress vital structures. Malignant tumors can invade other organs, spread to distant
locations (metastasize) and become life-threatening.
A few types of cancer in non-humans have been found to be contagious ("parasitic cancer"), such as Sticker's sarcoma,
which affects dogs. The closest known analog to this in humans is individuals who have "caught cancer" from tumors hiding
inside organ transplants.
Molecular Biology
Carcinogenesis, which means the initiation or generation of cancer, is the process of derangement of the rate of cell
division due to damage to DNA. Cancer is, ultimately, a disease of genes. In order for cells to start dividing
uncontrollably, genes which regulate cell growth must be damaged. Proto-oncogenes are genes which promote cell growth
and mitosis, a process of cell division, and tumor suppressor genes discourage cell growth, or temporarily halt cell
division in order to carry out DNA repair. Typically, a series of several mutations to these genes are required before
a normal cell transforms into a cancer cell.
Proto-oncogenes promote cell growth through a variety of ways. Many can produce hormones, a "chemical messenger" between
cells which encourage mitosis, the effect of which depends on the signal transduction of the receiving tissue or cells.
Some are responsible for the signal transduction system and signal receptors in cells and tissues themselves, thus
controlling the sensitivity to such hormones. They often produce mitogens, or are involved in transcription of DNA in
protein synthesis, which creates the proteins and enzymes responsible for producing the products and biochemicals cells
use and interact with.
Mutations in proto-oncogenes can modify their expression and function, increasing the amount or activity of the product
protein. When this happens, they become oncogenes, and thus cells have a higher chance to divide excessively and
uncontrollably. The chance of cancer cannot be reduced by removing proto-oncogenes from the genome as they are critical
for growth, repair and homeostasis of the body. It is only when they become mutated that the signals for growth become
excessive.
Tumor suppressor genes code for anti-proliferation signals and proteins that suppress mitosis and cell growth. Generally
tumor suppressors are transcription factors that are activated by cellular stress or DNA damage. Often DNA damage will
cause the presence of free-floating genetic material as well as other signs, and will trigger enzymes and pathways which
lead to the activation of tumor suppressor genes. The functions of such genes is to arrest the progression of cell cycle
in order to carry out DNA repair, preventing mutations from being passed on to daughter cells. Canonical tumor suppressors
include the p53 protein, which is a transcription factor activated by many cellular stressors including hypoxia and
ultraviolet radiation damage.
Despite nearly half of all cancers possibly involving alterations in p53, its tumor suppressor function is poorly
understood. It is clear it has two functions: one a nuclear role as a transcription factor, and the other a cytoplasmic
role in cell cycle and division regulation and apoptosis.
The Warburg effect is the preferential use of glycolysis for energy to sustain cancer growth. p53 has been shown to
regulate the shift from the respiratory to the glycolytic pathway. Synthesis of Cytochrome c Oxidase 2 (SCO2) has been
recognized as the downstream mediator of this effect. SCO2 is critical for regulating the cytochrome c oxidase complex
within the mitochondria, and p53 can disrupt the SCO2 gene. P53 regulation of SCO2 and mitochondrial respiration may
provide a possible explanation for the Warburg effect.
However, a mutation can damage the tumor suppressor gene itself, or the signal pathway which activates it, "switching it
off". The invariable consequence of this is that DNA repair is hindered or inhibited: DNA damage accumulates without
repair, inevitably leading to cancer.
In general, mutations in both types of genes are required for cancer to occur. For example, a mutation limited to one
oncogene would be suppressed by normal mitosis control and tumor suppressor genes, which was first hypothesised as the
Knudson hypothesis. A mutation to only one tumor suppressor gene would not cause cancer either, due to the presence of
many "backup" genes that duplicate its functions. It is only when enough proto-oncogenes have mutated into oncogenes,
and enough tumor suppressor genes deactivated or damaged, that the signals for cell growth overwhelm the signals to
regulate it, that cell growth quickly spirals out of control. Often, because these genes regulate the processes that
prevent most damage to genes themselves, the rate of mutations increase as one gets older, because DNA damage forms a
feedback loop. Knudson’s two hit model has recently been challenged by several investigators. Inactivation of one allele
of some tumor suppressor genes is sufficient to cause tumors. This phenomenon is called haploinsufficiency and has been
demonstrated by a number of experimental approaches. Tumors caused by haploinsufficiency usually have a later age of
onset when compared with those by a two hit process.
Usually, oncogenes are dominant, as they contain gain-of-function mutations, while mutated tumor suppressors are
recessive, as they contain loss-of-function mutations. Each cell has two copies of the same gene, one from each parent,
and under most cases gain of function mutation in one copy of a particular proto-oncogene is enough to make that gene a
true oncogene, while usually loss of function mutation needs to happen in both copies of a tumor suppressor gene to render
that gene completely non-functional. However, cases exist in which one loss of function copy of a tumor suppressor gene
can render the other copy non-functional. This phenomenon is called the dominant negative effect and is observed in many
p53 mutations.
Mutation of tumor suppressor genes that are passed on to the next generation of not merely cells, but their offspring
can cause increased likelihoods for cancers to be inherited. Members of these families have increased incidence and
decreased latency of multiple tumors. The mode of inheritance of mutant tumor suppressors is that an affected member
inherits a defective copy from one parent, and a normal copy from the other. Because mutations in tumor suppressor
genes act in a recessive manner (although there are exceptions), the loss of the normal copy creates the cancer
phenotype. For instance, individuals who are heterozygous for p53 mutations are often victims of Li-Fraumeni syndrome,
and those who are heterozygous for Rb mutations develop retinoblastoma. Similarly, mutations in the APC gene are linked
to adenopolyposis colon cancer, with thousands of polyps in colon while young, while mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 lead
to early onset of breast cancer.
Cancer pathology is ultimately due to the accumulation of DNA mutations that negatively effect expression of tumour
suppressor proteins or positively effect the expression of proteins that drive the cell cycle. Substances that cause
these mutations are known as mutagens, and mutagens that cause cancers are known as carcinogens. Particular substances
have been linked to specific types of cancer. Tobacco smoking is associated with lung cancer. Prolonged exposure to
radiation, particularly ultraviolet radiation from the sun, leads to melanoma and other skin malignancies. Breathing
asbestos fibers is associated with mesothelioma. In more general terms, chemicals called mutagens and free radicals are
known to cause mutations. Other types of mutations can be caused by chronic inflammation, as neutrophil granulocytes
secrete free radicals that damage DNA. Chromosomal translocations, such as the Philadelphia chromosome, are a special
type of mutation that involve exchanges between different chromosomes.
Many mutagens are also carcinogens, but some carcinogens are not mutagens. Examples of carcinogens that are not mutagens
include alcohol and estrogen. These are thought to promote cancers through their stimulating effect on the rate of cell
mitosis. Faster rates of mitosis increasingly leave less opportunities for repair enzymes to repair damaged DNA during
DNA replication, increasing the likelihood of a genetic mistake. A mistake made during mitosis can lead to the daughter
cells receiving the wrong number of chromosomes, which leads to aneuploidy and may lead to cancer.
Furthermore, many cancers originate from a viral infection; this is especially true in animals such as birds, but also
in humans, as viruses are responsible for 15% of human cancers worldwide. The main viruses associated with human cancers
are human papillomavirus,
hepatitis B virus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human T-lymphotropic virus. Experimental and
epidemiological data imply a causative role for viruses and they appear to be the second most important risk factor for
cancer development in humans, exceeded only by tobacco usage. The mode of virally-induced tumors can be divided into
two, acutely-transforming or slowly-transforming. In acutely transforming viruses, the viral particles carry a gene that
encodes for an overactive oncogene called viral-oncogene (v-onc), and the infected cell is transformed as soon as v-onc is
expressed. In contrast, in slowly-transforming viruses, the virus genome is inserted, especially as viral genome insertion
is an obligatory part of retroviruses, near a proto-oncogene in the host genome. The viral promoter or other transcription
regulation elements in turn cause overexpression of that proto-oncogene, which in turn induces uncontrolled cellular
proliferation. Because viral genome insertion is not specific to proto-oncogenes and the chance of insertion near that
proto-oncogene is low, slowly-transforming viruses have very long tumor latency compared to acutely-transforming viruses,
which already carry the viral-oncogene.
It is impossible to tell the initial cause for any specific cancer. However, with the help of molecular biological
techniques, it is possible to characterize the mutations or chromosomal aberrations within a tumor, and rapid progress
is being made in the field of predicting prognosis based on the spectrum of mutations in some cases. For example, some
tumors have a defective p53 gene. This mutation is associated with poor prognosis, since those tumor cells are less likely
to go into apoptosis or programmed cell death when damaged by therapy. Telomerase mutations remove additional barriers,
extending the number of times a cell can divide. Other mutations enable the tumor to grow new blood vessels to provide
more nutrients, or to metastasize, spreading to other parts of the body.
Malignant tumor cells have distinct properties:
- Evading apoptosis
- Unlimited growth potential (immortalitization) due to overabundance of telomerase
- Self-sufficiency of growth factors
- Insensitivity to anti-growth factors
- Increased cell division rate
- Altered ability to differentiate
- No ability for contact inhibition
- Ability to invade neighbouring tissues
- Ability to build metastases at distant sites
- Ability to promote blood vessel growth (angiogenesis)
A cell that degenerates into a tumor cell does not usually acquire all these properties at once, but its descendant cells
are selected to build them. This process is called clonal evolution. A first step in the development of a tumor cell is
usually a small change in the DNA, often a point mutation, which leads to a genetic instability of the cell. The
instability can increase to a point where the cell loses whole chromosomes, or has multiple copies of several. Also,
the DNA methylation pattern of the cell changes, activating and deactivating genes without the usual regulation. Cells
that divide at a high rate, such as epithelials, show a higher risk of becoming tumor cells than those which divide less,
for example neurons.
Morphology
Cancer tissue has a distinctive appearance under the microscope. Among the distinguishing traits are a large number of
dividing cells, variation in nuclear size and shape, variation in cell size and shape, loss of specialized cell features,
loss of normal tissue organization, and a poorly defined tumor boundary. Immunohistochemistry and other molecular methods
may characterise specific markers on tumor cells, which may aid in diagnosis and prognosis.
Biopsy and microscopical examination can also distinguish between malignancy and hyperplasia, which refers to tissue
growth based on an excessive rate of cell division, leading to a larger than usual number of cells but with a normal
orderly arrangement of cells within the tissue. This process is considered reversible. Hyperplasia can be a normal tissue
response to an irritating stimulus, for example callus.
Dysplasia is an abnormal type of excessive cell proliferation characterized by loss of normal tissue arrangement and cell
structure. Often such cells revert to normal behavior, but occasionally, they gradually become malignant.
The most severe cases of dysplasia are referred to as "carcinoma in situ." In Latin, the term "in situ" means "in place",
so carcinoma in situ refers to an uncontrolled growth of cells that remains in the original location and shows no
propensity to invade other tissues. Nevertheless, carcinoma in situ may develop into an invasive malignancy and is
usually removed surgically, if possible.
Heredity
Most forms of cancer are "sporadic", and have no basis in heredity. There are, however, a number of recognised syndromes
of cancer with a hereditary component, often a defective tumor suppressor allele. Examples are:
- Certain inherited mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with an elevated risk of breast
cancer and ovarian cancer
- Tumors of various endocrine organs in multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN types 1, 2a, 2b)
- Li-Fraumeni syndrome (various tumors such as osteosarcoma, breast cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma, brain tumors)
due to mutations of p53
- Turcot syndrome (brain tumors and colonic polyposis)
- Familial adenomatous polyposis an inherited mutation of the APC gene that leads to early onset of colon
carcinoma.
- Retinoblastoma in young children is an inherited cancer
Lifestyle Factors
The most consistent finding, over decades of research, is the strong association between tobacco use and cancers of many
sites. Hundreds of epidemiological studies have confirmed this association. Further support comes from the fact that
lung cancer death rates in the United States have mirrored smoking patterns, with increases in smoking followed by
dramatic increases in lung cancer death rates and, more recently, decreases in smoking followed by decreases in lung
cancer death rates in men. Lifestyle choices cause cancer: tobacco, diet, exercise, alcohol, tanning choices, and certain
sexually transmitted diseases are the major risks. "Most cancers are related to known lifestyle factors."
There is also a growing body of research that correlates cancer incidence with the lower levels of melatonin produced in
the body when people spend more time in bright-light conditions, as happens typically in the well-lit
nighttime environments of the more developed countries. This effect is compounded in people who sleep fewer hours and in
people who work at night, two groups that are known to have higher cancer rates.
Epidemiology
Cancer epidemiology is the study of the incidence of cancer as a way to infer possible trends and causes. The first such
cause of cancer was identified by British surgeon Percivall Pott, who discovered in 1775 that cancer of the scrotum was
a common disease among chimney sweeps. The work of other individual physicians led to various insights, but when
physicians started working together they could make firmer conclusions.
A founding paper of this discipline was the work of Janet Lane-Claypon, who published a comparative study in 1926 of 500
breast cancer cases and 500 control patients of the same background and lifestyle for the British Ministry of Health. Her
ground-breaking work on cancer epidemiology was carried on by Richard Doll and Austin Bradford Hill, who published "Lung
Cancer and Other Causes of Death In Relation to Smoking. A Second Report on the Mortality of British Doctors" followed
in 1956 (otherwise known as the British doctors study). Richard Doll left the London Medical Research Center (MRC), to
start the Oxford unit for Cancer epidemiology in 1968. With the use of computers, the unit was the first to compile large
amounts of cancer data. Modern epidemiological methods are closely linked to current concepts of disease and public
health policy. Over the past 50 years, great efforts have been spent on gathering data across medical practise, hospital,
provincial, state, and even country boundaries, as a way to study the interdependence of environmental and cultural
factors on cancer incidence.
The biggest problem facing cancer epidemiology today is the changing concept of 'cancer incidence'. For example, a breast
cancer tumor with a very slow growth rate may be found with a mammogram at 50 years, while the same tumor may have been
found as a noteworthy 'lump' at 70 years, depending on the specific growth factors affecting that particular patient's
case. As diagnostic tools improve, this has a direct impact on the epidemiological data.
In some Western countries, such as the USA, and the UK cancer is overtaking cardiovascular disease as the leading cause
of death. In many Third World countries cancer incidence (insofar as this can be measured) appears much lower, most likely
because of the higher death rates due to infectious disease or injury. With the increased control over
malaria and
tuberculosis in some Third World countries, incidence of cancer is expected to rise; this is termed the epidemiologic
transition in epidemiological terminology.
Cancer epidemiology closely mirrors risk factor spread in various countries. Hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer) is
rare in the West but is the main cancer in China and neighboring countries, most likely due to the endemic presence of
hepatitis B and aflatoxin in that population. Similarly, with tobacco smoking becoming more common in various Third World
countries, lung cancer incidence has increased in a parallel fashion.
Prevention
Cancer prevention is defined as active measures to decrease the incidence of cancer. This can be accomplished by avoiding
carcinogens or altering their metabolism, pursuing a lifestyle or diet that modifies cancer-causing factors and/or medical
intervention (chemoprevention, treatment of pre-malignant lesions).
Much of the promise for cancer prevention comes from observational epidemiologic studies that show associations between
modifiable life style factors or environmental exposures and specific cancers. Evidence is now emerging from randomized
controlled trials designed to test whether interventions suggested by the epidemiologic studies, as well as leads based
on laboratory research, actually result in reduced cancer incidence and mortality.
Examples of modifiable cancer risk include alcohol consumption (associated with increased risk of oral, esophageal,
breast, and other cancers), smoking (although 20% of women with lung cancer have never smoked, versus 10% of men),
physical inactivity (associated with increased risk of colon, breast, and possibly other cancers), and being overweight
(associated with colon, breast, endometrial, and possibly other cancers). Based on epidemiologic evidence, it is now
thought that avoiding excessive alcohol consumption, being physically active, and maintaining recommended body weight
may all contribute to reductions in risk of certain cancers; however, compared with tobacco exposure, the magnitude of
effect is modest or small and the strength of evidence is often weaker. Other lifestyle and environmental factors known
to affect cancer risk (either beneficially or detrimentally) include certain sexually transmitted diseases, the use of
exogenous hormones, exposure to ionizing radiation and ultraviolet radiation, certain occupational and chemical exposures,
and infectious agents.
Diet and Cancer
The consensus on diet and cancer is that
obesity increases the risk of developing cancer. Particular dietary practices
often explain differences in cancer incidence in different countries (e.g. gastric cancer is more common in Japan, while
colon cancer is more common in the United States). Studies have shown that immigrants develop the risk of their new
country, suggesting a link between diet and cancer rather than a genetic basis.
Despite frequent reports of particular substances (including foods) having a beneficial or detrimental effect on cancer
risk, few of these have an established link to cancer. These reports are often based on studies in cultured cell media
or animals. Public health recommendations cannot be made on the basis of these studies until they have been validated
in an observational (or occasionally a prospective interventional) trial in humans.
The case of beta-carotene provides an example of the necessity of randomized clinical trials. Epidemiologists studying
both diet and serum levels observed that high levels of beta-carotene, a precursor to vitamin A, were associated with a
protective effect, reducing the risk of cancer. This effect was particularly strong in lung cancer. This hypothesis led
to a series of large randomized trials conducted in both Finland and the United States (CARET study) during the 1980s
and 1990s. This study provided about 80,000 smokers or former smokers with daily supplements of beta-carotene or placebos.
Contrary to expectation, these tests found no benefit of beta-carotene supplementation in reducing lung cancer incidence
and mortality. In fact, the risk of lung cancer was slightly, but not significantly, increased by beta-carotene, leading
to an early termination of the study.
Other Chemoprevention Agents
Daily use of tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), typically for 5 years, has been demonstrated to
reduce the risk of developing breast cancer in high-risk women by about 50%. A recent study reported that the selective
estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene has similar benefits to tamoxifen in preventing breast cancer in high-risk women,
with a more favorable side effect profile.
Finasteride, a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, has been shown to lower the risk of
prostate cancer, though it seems to
mostly prevent low-grade tumors. The effect of COX-2 inhibitors such as rofecoxib and celecoxib upon the risk of colon
polyps have been studied in familial adenomatous polyposis patients and in the general population. In both groups,
there were significant reductions in colon polyp incidence, but this came at the price of increased cardiovascular
toxicity.
Genetic Testing
Genetic testing for high-risk individuals is already available for certain cancer-related genetic mutations. Carriers of
genetic mutations that increase risk for cancer incidence can undergo enhanced surveillance, chemoprevention, or
risk-reducing surgery.
| Gene | Cancer Types | Availability |
| BRCA1, BRCA2 | Breast, ovarian, pancreatic | Commercially available for clinical specimens |
| MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS, PMS2 | Colon, uterine, small bowel, stomach, urinary tract | Commercially available for clinical specimens |
Diagnosing Cancer
Most cancers are initially recognized either because signs or symptoms appear or through screening. Neither of these
lead to a definitive diagnosis, which usually requires the opinion of a pathologist.
Signs and Symptoms
Roughly, cancer symptoms can be divided into three groups:
- Local symptoms: unusual lumps or swelling (tumor), hemorrhage (bleeding), pain and/or ulceration. Compression
of surrounding tissues may cause symptoms such as jaundice.
- Symptoms of metastasis (spreading): enlarged lymph nodes, cough and hemoptysis, hepatomegaly (enlarged
liver), bone pain, fracture of affected bones and neurological symptoms. Although advanced cancer may
cause pain, it is often not the first symptom.
- Systemic symptoms: weight loss, poor appetite and cachexia (wasting), excessive sweating (night sweats),
anemia and specific paraneoplastic phenomena, i.e. specific conditions that are due to an active cancer,
such as thrombosis or hormonal changes.
Every single item in the above list can be caused by a variety of conditions (a list of which is referred to as the
differential diagnosis). Cancer may be a common or uncommon cause of each item.
Biopsy
A cancer may be suspected for a variety of reasons, but the definitive diagnosis of most malignancies must be confirmed
by histological examination of the cancerous cells by a pathologist. Tissue can be obtained from a biopsy or surgery.
Many biopsies (such as those of the skin, breast or liver) can be done in a doctor's office. Biopsies of other organs
are performed under anesthesia and require surgery in an operating room.
The tissue diagnosis indicates the type of cell that is proliferating, its histological grade and other features of the
tumor. Together, this information is useful to evaluate the prognosis of this patient and choose the best treatment.
Cytogenetics and immunohistochemistry may provide information about future behavior of the cancer (prognosis) and best
treatment.
Screening
Cancer screening is an attempt to detect unsuspected cancers in the population. Screening tests suitable for large numbers
of healthy people must be relatively affordable, safe, noninvasive procedures with acceptably low rates of false positive
results. If signs of cancer are detected, more definitive and invasive follow up tests are performed to confirm the
diagnosis.
Screening for cancer can lead to earlier diagnosis. Early diagnosis may lead to extended life. A number of different
screening tests have been developed. Breast cancer screening can be done by breast self-examination. Screening by regular
mammograms detects tumors even earlier than self-examination, and many countries use it to systematically screen all
middle-aged women. Colorectal cancer can be detected through fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy, which reduces
both colon cancer incidence and mortality, presumably through the detection and removal of pre-malignant polyps.
Similarly, cervical cytology testing (using the Pap smear) leads to the identification and excision of precancerous
lesions. Over time, such testing has been followed by a dramatic reduction of cervical cancer incidence and mortality.
Testicular self-examination is recommended for men beginning at the age of 15 years to detect testicular cancer.
prostate cancer
can be screened for by a digital rectal exam along with prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood testing.
Screening for cancer is controversial in cases when it is not yet known if the test actually saves lives. The controversy
arises when it is not clear if the benefits of screening outweigh the risks of follow-up diagnostic tests and cancer
treatments. For example: when screening for
prostate cancer, the PSA test may detect small cancers that would never become
life threatening, but once detected will lead to treatment. This situation, called overdiagnosis, puts men at risk for
complications from unnecessary treatment such as surgery or radiation. Follow up procedures used to diagnose
prostate cancer
(prostate biopsy) may cause side effects, including bleeding and infection.
Prostate cancer treatment may cause
incontinence (inability to control urine flow) and erectile dysfunction (erections inadequate for intercourse). Similarly,
for breast cancer, there have recently been criticisms that breast screening programs in some countries cause more
problems than they solve. This is because screening of women in the general population will result in a large number
of women with false positive results which require extensive follow-up investigations to exclude cancer, leading to
having a high number-to-treat (or number-to-screen) to prevent or catch a single case of breast cancer early.
Cervical cancer screening via the Pap smear has the best cost-benefit profile of all the forms of cancer screening from
a public health perspective as, being largely caused by a virus, it has clear risk factors (sexual contact), and the
natural progression of cervical cancer is that it normally spreads slowly over a number of years therefore giving more
time for the screening program to catch it early. Moreover, the test itself is easy to perform and relatively cheap.
For these reasons, it is important that the benefits and risks of diagnostic procedures and treatment be taken into
account when considering whether to undertake cancer screening.
Use of medical imaging to search for cancer in people without clear symptoms is similarly marred with problems. There is
a significant risk of detection of what has been recently called an incidentaloma - a benign lesion that may be interpreted
as a malignancy and be subjected to potentially dangerous investigations.
Canine cancer detection has shown promise, but is still in the early stages of research.
Treatment of Cancer
Cancer can be treated by surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy or other
methods. The choice of therapy depends upon the location and grade of the tumor and the stage of the disease, as well as
the general state of the patient (performance status). A number of experimental cancer treatments are also under
development.
Complete removal of the cancer without damage to the rest of the body is the goal of treatment. Sometimes this can be
accomplished by surgery, but the propensity of cancers to invade adjacent tissue or to spread to distant sites by
microscopic metastasis often limits its effectiveness. The effectiveness of chemotherapy is often limited by toxicity to
other tissues in the body. Radiation can also cause damage to normal tissue.
Because "cancer" refers to a class of diseases, it is unlikely that there will ever be a single "cure for cancer" any more
than there will be a single treatment for all infectious diseases.
Surgery
In theory, cancers can be cured if entirely removed by surgery, but this is not always possible. When the cancer has
metastasized to other sites in the body prior to surgery, complete surgical excision is usually impossible.
Examples of surgical procedures for cancer include mastectomy for breast cancer and prostatectomy for
prostate cancer.
The goal of the surgery can be either the removal of only the tumor, or the entire organ. A single cancer cell is invisible
to the naked eye but can regrow into a new tumor, a process called recurrence. For this reason, the pathologist will
examine the surgical specimen to determine if a margin of healthy tissue is present, thus decreasing the chance that
microscopic cancer cells are left in the patient.
In addition to removal of the primary tumor, surgery is often necessary for staging, e.g. determining the extent of the
disease and whether it has metastasized to regional lymph nodes. Staging is a major determinant of prognosis and of the
need for adjuvant therapy.
Occasionally, surgery is necessary to control symptoms, such as spinal cord compression or bowel obstruction. This is
referred to as palliative treatment.
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy is the treatment of cancer with drugs ("anticancer drugs") that can destroy cancer cells. It interferes with
cell division in various possible ways, e.g. with the duplication of DNA or the separation of newly formed chromosomes.
Most forms of chemotherapy target all rapidly dividing cells and are not specific for cancer cells. Hence, chemotherapy
has the potential to harm healthy tissue, especially those tissues that have a high replacement rate (e.g. intestinal
lining). These cells usually repair themselves after chemotherapy.
Because some drugs work better together than alone, two or more drugs are often given at the same time. This is called
"combination chemotherapy"; most chemotherapy regimens are given in a combination.
The treatment of some leukaemias and
lymphomas requires the use of high-dose chemotherapy, and total body irradiation
(TBI). This treatment ablates the bone marrow, and hence the body's ability to recover and repopulate the blood. For
this reason, bone marrow, or peripheral blood stem cell harvesting is carried out before the ablative part of the therapy,
to enable "rescue" after the treatment has been given. This is known as autologous transplantation. Alternatively, bone
marrow may be transplanted from a matched unrelated donor (MUD).
Monoclonal Antibody Therapy
Immunotherapy is the use of immune mechanisms against tumors. These are used in various forms of cancer, such as breast
cancer (trastuzumab/Herceptin®) and
leukemia (gemtuzumab ozogamicin/Mylotarg®). The agents are monoclonal antibodies
directed against proteins that are characteristic to the cells of the cancer in question, or cytokines that modulate the
immune system's response.
Immunotherapy
Other, more contemporary methods for generating non-specific immune response against tumours include intravesical BCG
immunotherapy for superficial bladder cancer, and use of interferon and interleukin. Vaccines to generate non-specific
immune responses are the subject of intensive research for a number of tumours, notably malignant melanoma and renal
cell carcinoma.
Radiation Therapy
Radiation therapy (also called radiotherapy, X-ray therapy, or irradiation) is the use of ionizing radiation to kill
cancer cells and shrink tumors. Radiation therapy can be administered externally via external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)
or internally via brachytherapy. The effects of radiation therapy are localised and confined to the region being treated.
Radiation therapy injures or destroys cells in the area being treated (the "target tissue") by damaging their genetic
material, making it impossible for these cells to continue to grow and divide. Although radiation damages both cancer
cells and normal cells, most normal cells can recover from the effects of radiation and function properly. The goal of
radiation therapy is to damage as many cancer cells as possible, while limiting harm to nearby healthy tissue. Hence,
it is given in many fractions, allowing healthy tissue to recover between fractions.
Radiation therapy may be used to treat almost every type of solid tumor, including cancers of the brain, breast, cervix,
larynx, lung, pancreas, prostate, skin, stomach, uterus, or soft tissue sarcomas. Radiation is also used to treat
leukemia and
lymphoma. Radiation dose to each site depends on a number of factors, including the radiosensitivity of
each cancer type and whether there are tissues and organs nearby that may be damaged by radiation. Thus, as with every
form of treatment, radiation therapy is not without its side effects.
Hormonal Suppression
The growth of some cancers can be inhibited by providing or blocking certain hormones. Common examples of hormone-sensitive
tumors include certain types of breast and
prostate cancers. Removing or blocking estrogen or testosterone is often an
important additional treatment.
Symptom Control
Although the control of the symptoms of cancer is not typically thought of as a treatment directed at the cancer, it is
an important determinant of the quality of life of cancer patients, and plays an important role in the decision whether
the patient is able to undergo other treatments. Although all practicing doctors have the therapeutic skills to control
pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hemorrhage and other common problems in cancer patients, the multidisciplinary
specialty of palliative care has arisen specifically in response to the symptom control needs of this group of patients.
Pain medication, such as morphine and oxycodone, and antiemetics, drugs to suppress nausea and vomiting, are very commonly
used in patients with cancer-related symptoms.
Chronic
pain due to cancer is almost always associated with continuing tissue damage due to the disease process or the
treatment (i.e. surgery, radiation, chemotherapy). Although there is always a role for environmental factors and affective
disturbances in the genesis of
pain behaviors, these are not usually the predominant etiologic factors in patients with
cancer
pain. Furthermore, many patients with severe
pain associated with cancer are nearing the end of their lives and
palliative therapies are required. Issues such as social stigma of using opioids, work and functional status, and health
care consumption are not likely to be important in the overall case management. Hence, the typical strategy for cancer
pain management is to get the patient as comfortable as possible using opioids and other medications, surgery, and
physical measures.
Treatment Trials
Clinical trials, also called research studies, test new treatments in people with cancer. The goal of this research is
to find better ways to treat cancer and help cancer patients. Clinical trials test many types of treatment such as new
drugs, new approaches to surgery or radiation therapy, new combinations of treatments, or new methods such as gene
therapy.
A clinical trial is one of the final stages of a long and careful cancer research process. The search for new treatments
begins in the laboratory, where scientists first develop and test new ideas. If an approach seems promising, the next
step may be testing a treatment in animals to see how it affects cancer in a living being and whether it has harmful
effects. Of course, treatments that work well in the lab or in animals do not always work well in people. Studies are
done with cancer patients to find out whether promising treatments are safe and effective.
Patients who take part may be helped personally by the treatment(s) they receive. They get up-to-date care from cancer
experts, and they receive either a new treatment being tested or the best available standard treatment for their cancer.
Of course, there is no guarantee that a new treatment being tested or a standard treatment will produce good results.
New treatments also may have unknown risks, but if a new treatment proves effective or more effective than standard
treatment, study patients who receive it may be among the first to benefit.
Cancer Vaccines
Considerable research effort is now devoted to the development of vaccines (to prevent infection by oncogenic infectious
agents, as well as to mount an immune response against cancer-specific epitopes) and to potential venues for gene therapy
for individuals with genetic mutations or polymorphisms that put them at high risk of cancer.
As of October 2005, researchers found that an experimental vaccine for HPV types 16 and 18 was 100% successful at
preventing infection with these types of HPV and, thus, are able to prevent the majority of cervical cancer cases.
Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) treatments are the diverse group of medical and health care systems,
practices, and products that are not part of conventional medicine. Oncology, the study of human cancer, has a long
history of incorporating unconventional or botanical treatments into mainstream cancer therapy. Some examples of this
phenomenon include the chemotherapy agent paclitaxel, which is derived from the bark of the Pacific Yew tree, and ATRA,
all-trans retinoic acid, a derivative of Vitamin A that induces cures in an aggressive
leukemia known as acute
promyelocytic
leukemia. Many "complementary" and "alternative" medicines for cancer have not been studied using the
scientific method, such as in well-designed clinical trials, or they have only been studied in preclinical (animal or
in-vitro) laboratory studies. Many times, "complementary" and "alternative" medicines are supported by marketing materials
and "testimonials" from users of the substances.
Complementary and alternative medicines are not regulated by any government agency, so manufacturers are not under any
guidelines about standardized doses from lot to lot of medication, or other substances present in the pills. An example
of this problem was PC-SPES, marketed as an alternative treatment for
prostate cancer. This medication was tested using
sophisticated spectrometry techniques and found to have warfarin, the estrogenic compound DES, and other non-naturally
occurring substances in the pills, along with tens of other compounds. As a result, the FDA banned PC-SPES from the
United States marketplace in 2002. PC-SPES was effective treatment for
prostate cancer in clinical trials, and efforts
have been made to identify which of its many ingredients were responsible for the improved results.
"Complementary medicine" refers to substances used along with conventional medicine, while "alternative medicine" refers
to compounds used instead of conventional medicine. A study of CAM use in patients with cancer in the July 2000 issue of
the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that 69 percent of 453 cancer patients had used at least one CAM therapy as part
of their cancer treatment.
Some complementary measures include botanical medicine, such as an NIH trial currently underway testing mistletoe extract
combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors, acupuncture for managing chemotherapy-associated nausea and
vomiting and in controlling
pain associated with surgery, prayer, psychological approaches such as "imaging" or meditation
to aid in
pain relief or improve mood.
A wide range of alternative treatments have been offered for cancer over the last century. The appeal of alternative cures
arises from the daunting risks, costs, or potential side effects of many conventional treatments, or in the limited
prospect for cure. No alternative therapies have been shown in randomized controlled trials to effectively cure cancer
by themselves, although the Journal of Urology published a study in 2005 demonstrating that a consuming plant based
diet and making other lifestyle changes was able to reduce cancer markers in a group of men with
prostate cancer using
no conventional treatments. Other (unproven) anti-cancer diets include the grape diet and the cabbage diet.
Quackery in the Treatment of Cancer
Many substances and techniques proposed for cancer treatment are quackery. Some of the more well-known examples of these
ineffectual and potentially dangerous treatments for cancer include megavitamin therapy, electromagnetic therapy with
electrical devices (e.g., "rhumart", "zappers"), laetrile, and homeopathic remedies, unconventional use of conventional
drugs (e.g., insulin), purges or enemas, physical manipulations of the body, and herbal preparations such as essiac.
While patient stories attesting to the efficacy of these treatments sometimes exist, the treatments share a common thread
in that there is no evidence that they accomplish the goal intended in a measurable fashion. Cancer patients are
particularly vulnerable to quackery, since they may turn to any available treatment out of desperation for a better
outcome, or for simple survival. Quacks can take advantage of this desperation, and without scientific assessment of
efficacy, there is no way to determine which treatment is valid and which is quackery.
Coping with Cancer
Many local organizations offer a variety of practical and support services to people with cancer. Support can take the
form of support groups, counseling, advice, financial assistance, transportation to and from treatment, films or
information about cancer. Neighborhood organizations, local health care providers, or area hospitals may have resources
or services available.
While some people are reluctant to seek counseling, studies show that having someone to talk to reduces stress and helps
people both mentally and physically. Counseling can also provide emotional support to cancer patients and help them
better understand their illness. Different types of counseling include individual, group, family, self-help (sometimes
called peer counseling), bereavement, patient-to-patient, and sexuality.
Many governmental and charitable organizations have been established to help patients cope with cancer. These organizations
often are involved in cancer prevention, cancer treatment, and cancer research. Examples include: American Cancer Society,
Lance Armstrong Foundation, BC Cancer Agency, Macmillan Cancer Relief , the Terry Fox Foundation, Cancer Research UK,
Cancer Research Foundation, Canadian Cancer Society, International Agency for Research on Cancer, The Cancer Council
Australia and the National Cancer Institute (US).
Coping with Cancer
Cancer has a reputation for being a deadly disease. While this certainly applies to certain particular types, the truths
behind the historical connotations of cancer are increasingly being overturned by advances in medical care. Some types of
cancer have a prognosis that is substantially better than nonmalignant diseases such as heart failure and stroke.
Progressive and disseminated malignant disease has a substantial impact on a cancer patient's quality of life, and many
cancer treatments (such as chemotherapy) may have severe side-effects. In the advanced stages of cancer, many patients
need extensive care, affecting family members and friends. Palliative care solutions may include permanent or "respite"
hospice nursing.
Coping with Cancer
Cancer research is the intense scientific effort to understand disease processes and discover possible therapies. Although
understanding of cancer has greatly increased since the last decades of the 20th century, few radically new therapies have
been discovered.
Targeted therapy which first became available in the late 1990s has had a significant impact in the treatment of some
types of cancer, and is currently a very active research area. This constitutes the use of agents specific for the
deregulated proteins of cancer cells. Small molecules (such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and gefitinib) and
monoclonal antibodies have proven to be a major step in oncological treatment. Targeted therapy can also involve small
peptidic structures as ´homing device´ which can bind to cell surface receptors or affected extracellular matrix
surrounding the tumor. Radionuclides which are attached to this peptides (e.g. RGDs) eventually kill the cancer cell if
the nuclide decays in the vicinity of the cell (vide supra Radiation therapy). Especially oligo- or multimeris of these
binding motifs are of great interest, since this can lead to enhanced tumor specificity and avidity.
(adapted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer)
Authors: Naccarati A, Pardini B, Hemminki K, Vodicka P.
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Mutations in one of the DNA repair genes are one of the most common reasons for cancer, and it may be assumed that the
individual genetic background modulating the DNA repair capacity may affect the susceptibility to cancer. Numerous
polymorphisms (mainly SNPs) have been identified for DNA repair genes, although their functional outcome and phenotypic
effect is often unknown. The aim of the present review is to evaluate the studies investigating a possible influence of
DNA repair polymorphisms in the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer and/or adenoma. Overall, no relevant common findings
emerge among the studies, except for some statistically significant associations between polymorphisms in the XRCC1 and
XPD genes, mainly for colorectal adenoma risk. Other individual associations remain to be confirmed. This inconclusive data
may suggest that the modulation of cancer risk depends not only on a single gene/SNP, but also on a joint effect of
multiple polymorphisms (or haplotypes) within different genes or pathways, in close interaction with environmental factors.
The relevance of many low-penetrance genes in cancer susceptibility is supposed to be very subtle. Several reviewed
association studies revealed weaknesses in their design. However, there has been a progressive improvement over the years
in aspects such as simultaneous genotyping and combined analyses of different polymorphisms in larger numbers of patients
and controls, as well as stratification of results by ethnicity, gender, and tumor localization. This gained experience
shows that only carefully designed studies of a sufficient statistical power may resolve the relationships between
polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk.
Journal: Mutat Res. 2007 Feb 28;
Paclitaxel (Taxol(R)) and docetaxel (Taxotere(R)) are very important anti-tumor drugs in clinical use for cancer. However,
their clinical utility is limited due to systemic toxicity, low solubility and inactivity against drug resistant tumors. To
improve chemotherapeutic levels of these drugs, it would be highly desirable to design strategies which bypass the above
limitations. In this respect various prodrug and drug targeting strategies have been envisioned either to improve oral
bioavailability or tumor specific delivery of taxoids. Abnormal properties of cancer cells with respect to normal cells
have guided in designing of these protocols. This review article records the designed biochemical strategies and their
biological efficacies as potential taxoid chemotherapeutics.
Journal: Bioorg Med Chem. 2007 Mar 18;
Authors: Whitman S, Shah AM, Silva A, Ansell D.
Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System, 1500 South California Avenue, Chicago, IL 60608, United States.
Background: Despite the fact that recent studies suggest a narrowing in access to mammography, Black women are much more
likely to die from breast cancer than White women. Data at the community level regarding mammography screening can help
explain health disparities and inform plans for improved screening efforts. Methods: In 2002-2003, a comprehensive household
health survey in English or Spanish was conducted in six community areas with 1700 households. The module on mammography was based on a state-based nationwide health survey and included questions on frequency of mammography, repeat screenings, and several demographic variables. Results: The proportion of women >/=40 years (n=482) who received a mammogram in the past 2 years ranged from 74% to 90% across the six communities. The community with the highest screening proportion was predominantly Mexican and included recent immigrants. The screening proportion in the poorest community area, which was all Black, was 77%. Women with health insurance, higher income, and more education were more likely to receive a mammogram. Proportions for women >/=50 years (n=286) were slightly higher but similar. Repeat screening, which is recommended, occurred at lower levels. Conclusions: Access to and utilization of mammography have grown in recent years so that even these vulnerable communities had screening proportions at or even higher than the national average and the Healthy People Year 2010 objective. Nonetheless, repeat screening
sequences were lower and may require attention if mammography screening efforts are to have a greater impact on female
breast cancer mortality.
Journal: Cancer Detect Prev. 2007 Apr 5;
Authors: Moskowitz JM, Kazinets G, Wong JM, Tager IB.
140 Warren Hall, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA.
Background: A 48-month community intervention was conducted to improve breast and cervical cancer (BCC) screening among
Korean American (KA) women in Alameda County (AL), California. KA women in Santa Clara (SC) County, California served as a
comparison group. Methods: Random samples of KA women from each county were surveyed by telephone in 1994 (n=818) and 2002
(n=1084). Propensity score analyses were used to estimate the difference between counties in changes over time in screening
(Pap tests, breast self-examinations, clinical breast examinations, and mammography), and to estimate differences in
screening between participants and non-participants in an educational workshop among women in AL in 2002. Results:
Mammography screening and clinical breast examinations increased over time in both counties. Pap tests increased in AL but
not SC, and breast self-examinations did not change significantly in either county. None of the intervention-comparison
group differences over time were significant. In 2002, compared to non-participants, women who attended a workshop were
more likely to report a recent Pap test (P<.08). Conclusions: Although our overall intervention did not appear to enhance
screening practices at the community-level, attendance at a women's health workshop appears to have increased cervical
cancer screening.
Journal: Cancer Detect Prev. 2007 Apr 5;
Authors: Dopfel RP, Schulmeister K, Schernhammer ES.
Harvard University, A.L.M. Program, Biological Sciences, 51 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Context: Despite growing support for melatonin as a promising agent for cancer treatment and possibly cancer prevention,
few studies have elucidated factors that influence endogenous melatonin. This overview summarizes dietary and lifestyle
factors that have been shown to affect circulating melatonin levels. Biological mechanisms: To date, many animal studies and
in vitro experiments have illustrated that melatonin possesses oncostatic activity. Mechanisms that are currently being
studied include melatonin's activity as an indirect antioxidant and free radical scavenger; its action on the immune system;
suppression of fatty acid uptake and metabolism; and its ability to increase the degradation of calmoduline and to induce
apoptosis. Studies further suggest that melatonin reduces local estrogen synthesis, through down-regulation of the
hypothalamic-pituitary reproductive axis and direct actions of melatonin at the tumor cell level, thus behaving as a SERM.
Therapeutic applications: Several small clinical trials have demonstrated that melatonin has some potential, either alone
or in combination with standard cancer therapy, to yield favorable responses. Melatonin or its precursor tryptophan have
been found in numerous edible plants, but more studies are needed to evaluate the influence of diets rich in tryptophan and
melatonin on circulating melatonin levels in humans. Age, BMI, parity, and the use of certain drugs remain the factors that
have been associated most consistently with aMT6s levels. Discussion: Further insights into the effects of dietary and
lifestyle factors that modulate circulating melatonin levels may provide the basis for novel interventions to exploit
melatonin for the prevention and treatment of human diseases.
Journal: Cancer Detect Prev. 2007 Apr 5;
Authors: Dornfeld K, Simmons JR, Karnell L, Karnell M, Funk G, Yao M, Wacha J, Zimmerman B, Buatti JM.
Department ofRadiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that radiation dose to key sites in the upper aerodigestive tract is associated with
long-term functional outcome after (chemo)radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study examined
the outcome for 27 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for definitive management of their head-and-neck
cancer who were disease free for at least 1 year after treatment. Head-and-neck cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) was
assessed before treatment and at 1 year after treatment. Type of diet tolerated, presence of a feeding tube, and degree of
weight loss 1 year after treatment were also used as outcome measures. Radiation doses delivered to various points along
the upper aerodigestive tract, including base of tongue, lateral pharyngeal walls, and laryngeal structures, were determined
from each treatment plan. Radiation doses for each of these points were tested for correlation with outcome measures.
RESULTS: Higher doses delivered to the aryepiglottic folds, false vocal cords, and lateral pharyngeal walls near the false
cords correlated with a more restrictive diet, and higher doses to the aryepiglottic folds correlated with greater weight
loss (p < 0.05) 1 year after therapy. Better posttreatment speech QoL scores were associated with lower doses delivered
to structures within and surrounding the larynx. CONCLUSION: Our data show an inverse relationship between radiation dose
delivered to laryngeal structures and speech and diet and QoL outcomes after definitive (chemo)radiation treatment. These
findings suggest that efforts to deliver lower doses to laryngeal structures may improve outcomes after definitive
(chemo)radiation therapy.
Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 6;
Authors: Huang EH, Liao Z, Cox JD, Guerrero TM, Chang JY, Jeter M, Borghero Y, Wei X, Fossella F, Herbst RS, Blumenschein GR Jr, Moran C, Allen PK, Komaki R.
Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare outcomes for patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
(NSCLC) treated at our institution with concurrent chemoradiation with or without induction chemotherapy. METHODS AND
MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 265 consecutive patients who received definitive treatment with three-dimensional
conformal radiation and concurrent chemotherapy. Of these, 127 patients received induction chemotherapy before concurrent
chemoradiation. RESULTS: The two groups of patients (with induction vs. without induction chemotherapy) were similar in age,
performance status, weight loss, histology, grade, and stage. Patients who received induction chemotherapy had better
overall survival (median, 1.9 vs. 1.4 years; 5-year rate, 25% vs. 12%; p < 0.001) and distant metastasis-free survival
(5-year rate, 42% vs. 23%; p = 0.021). Locoregional control was not significantly different between the two groups.
Multivariate analysis showed that induction chemotherapy was the most significant factor affecting overall survival, with a
hazard ratio of 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.40-0.75; p < 0.001). A planned subgroup analysis showed that induction
chemotherapy was associated with a significant overall survival benefit for patients with adenocarcinoma or large-cell
carcinoma (5-year rate, 24% vs. 8%; p = 0.003) but not for those with squamous cell carcinoma. A multivariate analysis of
patients with adenocarcinoma or large-cell carcinoma confirmed that induction chemotherapy was the most significant factor
associated with better overall survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.78; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Our retrospective analysis suggests that in combination with concurrent chemoradiation, induction chemotherapy
may provide a small but significant survival benefit for patients with unresectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma or
large-cell carcinoma of the lung.
Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 5;
- Become a free member and get notified about studies in your area when they become available.
- Look over all of our current studies being conducted throughout the United States.