View Clinical Trial (Medical Research Study)
Effect of Prolonged Electrical Stimulation on Neural Plasticity in Spinal Cord Injury - NCT00387673-33125(Clinical Trial 152786)
ClinicalConnection.com has recently undergone an update and this page may no longer be up-to-date. Please Search For Clinical Trials to view the most current clinical trials listings.
| City: |
|
Miami |
|
State:
|
|
FL |
| Zip Code: |
|
33125 |
| Conditions: |
|
Spinal Cord Injury |
| Purpose: |
|
Electrical stimulation (pulses of electricity applied over the skin of your wrist) and
activity-based hand exercise have been shown to improve motor skill and strength in
individuals with stroke and have recently been shown to also have an effect on individuals
with spinal cord injury. Therefore, the purpose of this research study is to investigate
whether electrical stimulation alone or electrical stimulation followed by activity-based
training produces gains in pinch strength (how hard you can squeeze your thumb and pointer
finger together) and upper extremity function (how well your arm and hand can perform
activities) in individuals with spinal cord injury.
|
| Study summary: |
|
Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects 10,000 individuals per year in the United States.
Approximately one half of all individuals with SCI have tetraparesis due to cervical injury.
Impaired hand function significantly limits the ability of individuals with cervical SCI to
perform manual activities of daily living which affects these individuals physically,
psychologically and socially. Preliminary research by this investigator suggests that
somatosensory stimulation combined with activity-based training improves hand function and
strength in individuals with incomplete cervical SCI. Further investigations on these novel
techniques are warranted due to the need to establish proven effective rehabilitation
techniques that promote recovery of function in individuals with SCI.
The purpose of this research study is to: 1)determine if somatosensory stimulation in the
form of prolonged, peripheral nerve electrical stimulation can enhance the effect of an
upper extremity activity-based training program in individuals with incomplete cervical SCI,
and if so, 2) identify the operative neural mechanisms underlying the changes induced with
the application of somatosensory stimulation.
The hypotheses of this study are that individuals with incomplete cervical SCI:
1. a 6-week period of somatosensory stimulation of the hand, either alone or combined with
activity-based training, will produce improvements in behavioral outcomes that are
significantly greater than those produced by activity-based training preceded by a sham
stimulation period
2. this behavioral improvement will be associated with greater changes in cortical
excitation than will be observed in subjects receiving activity-based training preceded
by a sham stimulation period.
The specific objectives of this study are to:
1. Recruit male and female volunteers with spastic paresis due to incomplete SCI with
impaired hand function, and randomize subjects into 1 of 3 groups, each of which
receives 6 weeks of upper extremity training for 3 sessions/week, as follows: a)
somatosensory stimulation of the median, ulnar and radial nerves at the level of the
wrist (2 hours/session); SS group b) somatosensory stimulation of the median, ulnar and
radial nerves at the wrist (2 hours/session) followed by an activity-based upper
extremity training program (1 hour/session); SS+ABT group and c) sham somatosensory
stimulation of the median, ulnar and radial nerves at the wrist (2 hours/session)
followed by an activity-based upper extremity training program (1 hour/session); ABT
group then carry out training in the 3 subject groups simultaneously, each group
consisting of 2 subjects at a time, with 2 sets of subjects/year over a 2-year period,
yielding a target sample of 36 subjects.
2. Conduct pre-and post-training assessments of behavioral outcomes using Wolf Motor
Function Test and Jebsen Taylor Hand Function test to measure upper extremity function,
hand-held dynamometry to measure pinch grip strength, and Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament
Testing to measure sensory function.
3. Conduct pre-and post-training assessments of supraspinal motor recruitment, including
motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in response to transcranial magnetic
stimulation and extent and duration of cortical silent period in response to
transcranial magnetic stimulation; and spinal motoneuron excitability measured by
F-wave amplitude and persistence. |
| Criteria: |
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Trace voluntary thumb movement or able to pick up small objects with a tenodesis grip
- Between ages 18 and 60
- Spastic paresis (manifest as spasms, clonus, and/or hyperreflexia) due to
neurologically incomplete SCI
- Medically stable
- Communicate questions/needs and answer yes/no questions reliably.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Altered cognitive status
- Level of injury caudal to the C7 level
- History of CVA, seizures
- Implanted metal devices in the head, less than one year post injury, and severe
spasticity of the muscles of the upper extremities (defined by a score of 2 or higher
on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale)
- Patients with pacemakers will also be excluded from this study. |
|
|
|
| Study is available at: |
|
VA Medical Center, Miami Miami, FL 33125 United States
Primary Contact: Carlos Gomez-Orozco Email: carlos.gomez-orozco@va.gov Phone: 305-575-7000
Secondary Contact: Carlos Gomez-Orozco Email: carlos.gomez-orozco@va.gov Phone: (305) 575-7000 |
|
|
If you are interested in this clinical trial please use the contact information above. If you would like to get additional information about this clinical trial please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
|
| Trials Alerts: |
|
If you would like to be
notified of new clinical trials as they become available please
register for a free account.
|
|
| Data Source: |
|
ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Date Processed: |
|
March 21, 2011 |
Modifications to
this listing: |
|
Only selected fields are shown, please use the link
above to view all information about this clinical trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|