View Clinical Trial (Medical Research Study)
Impact of Supported Employment Versus Standard Vocational Rehabilitation in Veterans With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder - NCT00728325-01730(Clinical Trial 234798)
ClinicalConnection.com has recently undergone an update and this page may no longer be up-to-date. Please Search For Clinical Trials to view the most current clinical trials listings.
| City: |
|
Bedford |
|
State:
|
|
MA |
| Zip Code: |
|
01730 |
| Conditions: |
|
PTSD |
| Purpose: |
|
This prospective randomized study evaluates the impact of Supportive Employment (SE)
compared to standard vocational rehabilitation (VRP) on occupational, sobriety, psychiatric,
and quality of life outcomes and health care costs for veterans with chronic posttraumatic
stress disorder (PTSD).
|
| Study summary: |
|
Hypotheses or Key Questions
I. Primary Hypothesis (obtained + maintained employment): Subjects assigned to IPS will have
a higher maintained employed rate for the 12-mo observation period than their standard VRP
counterparts.
- I.a. First Component Primary Hypothesis (obtained employment): Subjects assigned to IPS
will have higher rates of obtained employment for the 12-mo observation period than the
VRP subjects.
- I.b. Second Component Primary Hypothesis (maintained employment): Among those subjects
employed, those assigned to IPS will have worked more weeks for the 12-mo observation
period than the VRP subjects.
II. Secondary Hypothesis: Those subjects who obtain competitive employment will have
significantly reduced symptoms of PTSD from baseline to endpoint compared to those subjects
who do not obtain competitive employment.
III. Confirmatory and Correlational Hypotheses: Compared to VRP subjects, those subjects
assigned to IPS will have:
- greater work intensity (# weeks, days, # hours, wages earned)
- higher total earnings
- greater improvement in quality of life outcomes
Supplemental hypothesis (moderator): Because of the superior integration with the mental
health (MH) treatment team, social work services, and community resources that the IPS-SE
employment specialist provides as part of this model, we hypothesize that the IPS-SE model
will have greater success in the maintenance of competitive employment compared to standard
VRP for veterans with PTSD challenged in one or more of these psychosocial domains. From a
research perspective, a variable that characterizes subjects for whom a particular treatment
will be effective is called a moderator of treatment.
The hypothesized moderators of IPS-SE and standard VRP for subjects with PTSD are: 1)
Transportation, 2) Housing, 3) Financial Means, and 4) Family Care Burden. We hypothesize
that these variables will have moderating effects for each of two outcomes: 1) number of
weeks the participant is competitively employed during the 12-month study period and 2)
their score on the Sheehan Disability Scale.
Several principles are important in defining a moderator. First, the moderator must
precede treatment. In our RCT, these psychosocial domains are baseline characteristics of
subjects enrolled in the study. Second, the moderator must be uncorrelated with treatment
choice. This will be the case in this RCT due to a 1:1 randomization, which should balance
baseline characteristics between the two groups. Third, a moderator of treatment must have
a differential effect of treatment for each level of the moderator. The treatment effect
(e.g., active vs. comparator) must be shown to be greater for one level of the moderator
(i.e. IPS-SE will show a greater effect size than standard VRP in subjects with a moderator
present). Also, an index that combines these domains will be explored and formulated to
identify subjects that may benefit to greater extent from IPS-SE. |
| Criteria: |
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- signed informed consent
- diagnosis of PTSD (based on MINI)
- male or female
- any race or ethnicity
- age 19-60
- currently unemployed
- interested in competitive employment
- planning to remain in a 100-mile radius of participating VAMC for the 12- mo
duration
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lifetime history of severe traumatic brain injury that has resulted in severe
cognitive disorder
- diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar I disorder
- dementia (a standard exclusion from VRP)
- immediate need of detoxification from alcohol or drugs (a standard VRP exclusion)
- pending active legal charges or expected incarceration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are interested in this clinical trial please use the contact information above. If you would like to get additional information about this clinical trial please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.
|
| Trials Alerts: |
|
If you would like to be
notified of new clinical trials as they become available please
register for a free account.
|
|
| Data Source: |
|
ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Date Processed: |
|
November 11, 2010 |
Modifications to
this listing: |
|
Only selected fields are shown, please use the link
above to view all information about this clinical trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|