Influenza
Influenza, commonly known as
flu, is an infectious disease of birds and mammals caused by an RNA virus of the family Orthomyxoviridae
(the influenza viruses). In humans, common symptoms of influenza infection are fever, sore throat, muscle
pains, severe headache, coughing, weakness
and general discomfort. In more serious cases, influenza causes pneumonia, which can be fatal, particularly in young children and the elderly. Sometimes
confused with the
common cold, influenza is a much more severe disease and is caused by a different type of virus. Although nausea and vomiting can be
produced, especially in children, these symptoms are more characteristic of the unrelated gastroenteritis, which is sometimes called "stomach flu"
or "24-hour flu."
Typically, influenza is transmitted from infected mammals through the air by coughs or sneezes, creating aerosols containing the virus, and from
infected birds through their droppings. Influenza can also be transmitted by saliva, nasal secretions, feces and blood. Infections occur through
contact with these bodily fluids or with contaminated surfaces. Flu viruses can remain infectious for about one week at human body temperature, over
30 days at 0 °C (32 °F), and indefinitely at very low temperatures (such as lakes in northeast Siberia). Most influenza strains can be inactivated
easily by disinfectants and detergents.
Flu spreads around the world in seasonal epidemics, killing millions of people in pandemic years and hundreds of thousands in non-pandemic years. Three
influenza pandemics occurred in the 20th century and killed tens of millions of people, with each of these pandemics being caused by the appearance of
a new strain of the virus in humans. Often, these new strains result from the spread of an existing flu virus to humans from other animal species. Since
it first killed humans in Asia in the 1990s, a deadly avian strain of H5N1 has posed the greatest risk for a new influenza pandemic; however, this
virus has not mutated to spread easily between people.
Vaccinations against influenza are most commonly given to high-risk humans in industrialized countries and to farmed poultry. The most common human
vaccine is the trivalent flu vaccine that contains purified and inactivated material from three viral strains. Typically this vaccine includes material
from two influenza A virus subtypes and one influenza B virus strain. A vaccine formulated for one year may be ineffective in the following year, since
the influenza virus changes rapidly over time and different strains become dominant. Antiviral drugs can be used to treat influenza, with neuraminidase
inhibitors being particularly effective.
Current Research
For current research articles click
- here
Etymology
The term influenza has its origins in 15th-century Italy, where the cause of the disease was ascribed to unfavourable astrological influences. Evolution
in medical thought led to its modification to influenza di freddo, meaning "influence of the cold." The word "influenza" was first attested in English
in 1743 when it was borrowed during an outbreak of the disease in Europe. Archaic terms for influenza include epidemic catarrh, grippe (from the
French grippe, meaning flu; sometimes spelled "grip" or "gripe"), sweating sickness, and Spanish fever (particularly for the 1918 pandemic strain).
History
The symptoms of human influenza were clearly described by Hippocrates roughly 2400 years ago. Since then, the virus has caused numerous pandemics.
Historical data on influenza are difficult to interpret, because the symptoms can be similar to those of other diseases, such as diphtheria, pneumonic
plague, typhoid fever, dengue, or typhus. The first convincing record of an influenza pandemic was of an outbreak in 1580, which began in Asia and
spread to Europe via Africa. In Rome over 8,000 people were killed, and several Spanish cities were almost wiped out. Pandemics continued sporadically
throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, with the pandemic of 1830–1833 being particularly widespread; it infected approximately a quarter of the
people exposed.
The most famous and lethal outbreak was the so-called Spanish flu pandemic (type A influenza, H1N1 subtype), which lasted from 1918 to 1919. Older
estimates say it killed 40–50 million people while current estimates say 50 million to 100 million people worldwide were killed. This pandemic
has been described as "the greatest medical holocaust in history" and may have killed as many people as the Black Death. This huge death toll
was caused by an extremely high infection rate of up to 50% and the extreme severity of the symptoms, suspected to be caused by cytokine storms.
Indeed, symptoms in 1918 were so unusual that initially influenza was misdiagnosed as dengue, cholera, or typhoid. One observer wrote, "One of the
most striking of the complications was hemorrhage from mucous membranes, especially from the nose, stomach, and intestine. Bleeding from the ears
and petechial hemorrhages in the skin also occurred." The majority of deaths were from bacterial pneumonia, a secondary infection caused by
influenza, but the virus also killed people directly, causing massive hemorrhages and edema in the lung.
The Spanish flu pandemic was truly global, spreading even to the Arctic and remote Pacific islands. The unusually severe disease killed between 2 and
20% of those infected, as opposed to the more usual flu epidemic mortality rate of 0.1%. Another unusual feature of this pandemic was that
it mostly killed young adults, with 99% of pandemic influenza deaths occurring in people under 65, and more than half in young adults 20 to 40 years
old. This is unusual since influenza is normally most deadly to the very young (under age 2) and the very old (over age 70). The total mortality of
the 1918–1919 pandemic is not known, but it is estimated that 2.5% to 5% of the world's population was killed. As many as 25 million may have been
killed in the first 25 weeks; in contrast,
HIV/
AIDS has killed 25 million in its first 25 years.
Later flu pandemics were not so devastating. They included the 1957 Asian Flu (type A, H2N2 strain) and the 1968 Hong Kong Flu (type A, H3N2 strain),
but even these smaller outbreaks killed millions of people. In later pandemics antibiotics were available to control secondary infections and this may
have helped reduce mortality compared to the Spanish Flu of 1918.
Known Flu Pandemics
| Name of pandemic | Date | Deaths | Subtype Involved | Pandemic Severity Index |
| Asiatc (Russian) Flu | 1889 - 1890 | 1 million | possibly H2NS | ? |
| Spanish Flu | 1918 - 1920 | 40 million | H1N1 | 5 |
| Asian Flu | 1957 - 1958 | 1 to 1.5 million | H2N2 | 2 |
| Hong Kong Flu | 1968 - 1969 | 0.75 to 1 million | H3N2 | 2 |
The etiological cause of influenza, the Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses, was first discovered in pigs by Richard Schope in 1931. This discovery was
shortly followed by the isolation of the virus from humans by a group headed by Patrick Laidlaw at the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom
in 1933. However, it was not until Wendell Stanley first crystallized tobacco mosaic virus in 1935 that the non-cellular nature of viruses was
appreciated.
The first significant step towards preventing influenza was the development in 1944 of a killed-virus vaccine for influenza by Thomas Francis, Jr.. This
built on work by Frank Macfarlane Burnet, who showed that the virus lost virulence when it was cultured in fertilized hen's eggs. Application of this
observation by Francis allowed his group of researchers at the University of Michigan to develop the first flu vaccine, with support from the U.S.
Army. The Army was deeply involved in this research due to its experience of influenza in World War I, when thousands of troops were killed by the
virus in a matter of months.
Although there were scares in New Jersey in 1976 (with the Swine Flu), world wide in 1977 (with the Russian Flu), and in Hong Kong and other Asian
countries in 1997 (with H5N1 avian influenza), there have been no major pandemics since the 1968 Hong Kong Flu. Immunity to previous pandemic influenza
strains and vaccination may have limited the spread of the virus and may have helped prevent further pandemics.
Microbiology
Types of Influenza Virus
The influenza virus is an RNA virus of the family Orthomyxoviridae, which comprises the influenzaviruses, Isavirus, and Thogotovirus. There are three
types of influenza virus: Influenzavirus A, Influenzavirus B, and Influenzavirus C. Influenza A and C infect multiple species, while influenza B
almost exclusively infects humans. The type A viruses are the most virulent human pathogens among the three influenza types and cause the most
severe disease. The Influenza A virus can be subdivided into different serotypes based on the antibody response to these viruses. The serotypes
that have been confirmed in humans, ordered by the number of known human pandemic deaths, are:
- H1N1 caused "Spanish Flu."
- H2N2 caused "Asian Flu."
- H3N2 caused "Hong Kong Flu."
- H5N1 is a pandemic threat in 2006–7 flu season.
- H7N7 has unusual zoonotic potential.
- H1N2 is endemic in humans and pigs.
- H9N2, H7N2, H7N3, H10N7.
Influenza B virus is almost exclusively a human pathogen and is less common than influenza A. The only other animal known to be susceptible to
influenza B infection is the seal. This type of influenza mutates at a rate 2–3 times lower than type A and consequently is less genetically
diverse, with only one influenza B serotype. As a result of this lack of antigenic diversity, a degree of immunity to influenza B is usually
acquired at an early age. However, influenza B mutates enough that lasting immunity is not possible. This reduced rate of antigenic change,
combined with its limited host range (inhibiting cross species antigenic shift), ensures that pandemics of influenza B do not occur.
The influenza C virus infects humans and pigs, and can cause severe illness and local epidemics. However, influenza C is less common than the other
types and usually seems to cause mild disease in children.
Structure and Properties
The following applies for Influenza A viruses, although other strains are very similar in structure:
The influenza A virus particle or virion is 80–120 nm in diameter and usually roughly spherical, although filamentous forms can occur. Unusually for
a virus, the influenza A genome is not a single piece of nucleic acid; instead, it contains eight pieces of segmented negative-sense RNA (13.5
kilobases total), which encode 11 proteins (HA, NA, NP, M1, M2, NS1, NEP, PA, PB1, PB1-F2, PB2). The best-characterised of these viral proteins
are hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, two large glycoproteins found on the outside of the viral particles. Neuraminidase is an enzyme involved in
the release of progeny virus from infected cells, by cleaving sugars that bind the mature viral particles. By contrast, hemagglutinin is a lectin
that mediates binding of the virus to target cells and entry of the viral genome into the target cell. The hemagglutinin (HA or H) and neuraminidase
(NA or N) proteins are targets for antiviral drugs. These proteins are also recognised by antibodies, i.e. they are antigens. The responses of
antibodies to these proteins are used to classify the different serotypes of influenza A viruses, hence the H and N in H5N1.
Infection and Replication
Influenza viruses bind through hemagglutinin onto sialic acid sugars on the surfaces of epithelial cells; typically in the nose, throat and lungs of
mammals and intestines of birds (Stage 1 in infection figure). The cell imports the virus by endocytosis. In the acidic endosome, part of the
haemagglutinin protein fuses the viral envelope with the vacuole's membrane, releasing the viral RNA (vRNA) molecules, accessory proteins and
RNA-dependent RNA transcriptase into the cytoplasm (Stage 2). These proteins and vRNA form a complex that is transported into the cell nucleus,
where the RNA-dependent RNA transcriptase begins transcribing complementary positive-sense vRNA (Steps 3a and b). The vRNA is either exported
into the cytoplasm and translated (step 4), or remains in the nucleus. Newly-synthesised viral proteins are either secreted through the Golgi
apparatus onto the cell surface (in the case of neuraminidase and hemagglutinin, step 5b) or transported back into the nucleus to bind vRNA and
form new viral genome particles (step 5a). Other viral proteins have multiple actions in the host cell, including degrading cellular mRNA and using
the released nucleotides for vRNA synthesis and also inhibiting translation of host-cell mRNAs.
Negative-sense vRNAs that form the genomes of future viruses, RNA-dependent RNA transcriptase, and other viral proteins are assembled into a virion.
Hemagglutinin and neuraminidase molecules cluster into a bulge in the cell membrane. The vRNA and viral core proteins leave the nucleus and enter
this membrane protrusion (step 6). The mature virus buds off from the cell in a sphere of host phospholipid membrane, acquiring hemagglutinin and
neuraminidase with this membrane coat (step 7). As before, the viruses adhere to the cell through hemagglutinin; the mature viruses detach once
their neuraminidase has cleaved sialic acid residues from the host cell. After the release of new influenza virus, the host cell dies.
Because of the absence of RNA proofreading enzymes, the RNA-dependent RNA transcriptase makes a single nucleotide insertion error roughly every 10
thousand nucleotides, which is the approximate length of the influenza vRNA. Hence, nearly every newly-manufactured influenza virus is a mutant.
The separation of the genome into eight separate segments of vRNA allows mixing or reassortment of vRNAs if more than one viral line has infected
a single cell. The resulting rapid change in viral genetics produces antigenic shifts and allow the virus to infect new host species and quickly
overcome protective immunity. This is important in the emergence of pandemics, as discussed in Epidemiology.
Diagnosis
In humans, influenza's effects are much more severe than those of the
common cold, and last longer. Recovery takes about one to two weeks. Influenza,
however, can be deadly, especially for the weak, old or chronically ill.
Symptoms
Symptoms of influenza can start quite suddenly one to two days after infection. Usually the first symptoms are chills or a chilly sensation but fever
is also common early in the infection, with body temperatures as high as 39 °C (approximately 103 °F). Many people are so ill that they are confined
to bed for several days, with aches and
pains throughout their bodies, which are worst in their backs and legs.
Common symptoms of the flu such as fever, headaches, and fatigue come from the huge amounts of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (such as
interferon or tumor necrosis factor) produced from influenza-infected cells. In contrast to the rhinovirus that causes the
common cold,
influenza does cause tissue damage, so symptoms are not entirely due to the inflammatory response. Symptoms of influenza may include:
- Body aches, especially joints and throat
- Coughing and sneezing
- Extreme coldness and fever
- Fatigue
- Headache
- Irritated watering eyes
- Nasal congestion
- Nausea and vomiting
- Reddened eyes, skin (especially face), mouth, throat and nose
It can be difficult to distinguish between the
common cold and influenza in the early stages of these infections, but usually the symptoms of the
flu are more severe than their
common-cold equivalents. Research on signs and symptoms of influenza found that the best findings for excluding the
diagnosis of influenza were:
Best Individual Findings For Excluding Influenza
| Finding: | Sensitivity | Specificity |
| Absence of fever | 86% | 25% |
| Absence of cough | 98% | 23% |
| Absence of nasal congestion | 70-90% | 20-40% |
Notes to table:
- Sensitivity is the proportion of people that tested positive of all the positive people tested. Specificity is the proportion of people
that tested negative of all the negative people tested. See sensitivity and specificity for further explanation of these terms.
- All three findings, especially fever, were less sensitive in patients over 60 years of age.
Since anti-viral drugs are effective in treating influenza if given early (see treatment section, below), it can be important to identify cases early.
Of the symptoms listed above, the combinations of findings below can improve diagnostic accuracy. Unfortunately, even combinations of findings are
imperfect. However, Bayes Theorem can combine pretest probability with clinical findings to adequately diagnose or exclude influenza in some patients.
The pretest probability has a strong seasonal variation; the current prevalence of influenza among patients in the United States receiving sentinel
testing is available at the CDC. Using the CDC data, the following table shows how the likelihood of influenza varies with prevalence:
Combinations of Findings for Diagnosing Influenza
| Combination of findings | Sensitivity | Specificity | As reported in study and projected during local outbreaks (prevalence=66%) | Projected during influenza season (prevalence=25%) | Projected in off-season (prevalence=2%) |
| PPV | NPV | PPV | NPV | PPV | NPV |
| Fever and cough | 64% | 67% | > 79% | 49% | 39% | 15% | 4% | 1% |
| Fever and cough and sore throat | 56% | 71% | 79% | 45% | 39% | 17% | 4% | 2% |
| Fever and cough and nasal congestion | 59% | 74% | 81% | 48% | 43% | 16% | 4% | 1% |
Two decision analysis studies suggest that during local outbreaks of influenza, the prevalence will be over 70% and thus patients with any of the
above combinations of symptoms may be treated with neuramidase inhibitors without testing. Even in the absence of a local outbreak, treatment may
be justified in the elderly during the influenza season as long as the prevalence is over 15%.
Most people who get influenza will recover in one to two weeks, but others will develop life-threatening complications (such as pneumonia). According
to the World Health Organization: "Every winter, tens of millions of people get the flu. Most are home, sick and miserable, for about a week.
Some—mostly the elderly—die. We know the world-wide death toll exceeds a few hundred thousand people a year, but even in developed countries the
numbers are uncertain, because medical authorities don't usually verify who actually died of influenza and who died of a flu-like illness." Even healthy
people can be affected, and serious problems from influenza can happen at any age. People over 50 years old, very young children and people of any age
with chronic medical conditions, are more likely to get complications from influenza: such as pneumonia,
bronchitis, sinus, and ear infections.
The flu can worsen chronic health problems. People with
emphysema, chronic
bronchitis or
asthma may experience shortness of breath while they have the
flu, and influenza may cause worsening of coronary heart disease or congestive heart failure. Smoking is another risk factor associated with more
serious disease and increased mortality from influenza.
Laboratory Tests
The available laboratory tests for influenza continue to improve. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintains an
up-to-date summary of available laboratory tests. According to the CDC, rapid diagnostic tests have a sensitivity of 70–75% and specificity of
90–95% when compared with viral culture. These tests may be especially useful during the influenza season (prevalence=25%) but in the absence of a
local outbreak, or peri-influenza season (prevalence=10%).
Epidemiology
Seasonal Variations
Influenza reaches peak prevalence in winter, and because the Northern and Southern Hemisphere have winter at different times of the year, there are
actually two different flu seasons each year. This is why the World Health Organization (assisted by the National Influenza Centers) makes
recommendations for two different vaccine formulations every year; one for the Northern, and one for the Southern Hemisphere.
It remains unclear why outbreaks of the flu occur seasonally rather than uniformly throughout the year. One possible explanation is that, because
people are indoors more often during the winter, they are in close contact more often, and this promotes transmission from person to person. Another
is that cold temperatures lead to drier air, which may dehydrate mucus, preventing the body from effectively expelling virus particles. The virus may
also survive longer on exposed surfaces (doorknobs, countertops, etc.) in colder temperatures. Increased travel and visitation due to the Northern
Hemisphere winter holiday season may also play a role. However, seasonal changes in infection rates are also seen in tropical regions and these
peaks of infection are seen mainly during the rainy season. Seasonal changes in contact rates from school-terms, which are a major factor in other
childhood diseases such as
measles and pertussis, may also play a role in flu. A combination of these small seasonal effects may be amplified by
"dynamical resonance" with the endogenous disease cycles. H5N1 exhibits seasonality in both humans and birds.
An alternative hypothesis to explain seasonality in influenza infections is an effect of vitamin D levels on immunity to the virus. This idea was first
proposed by Robert Edgar Hope-Simpson in 1965. He proposed that the cause of influenza epidemics during winter may be connected to seasonal
fluctuations of vitamin D, which is produced in the skin under the influence of solar (or artificial) UV radiation. This could explain why influenza
occurs mostly in winter and during the tropical rainy season, when people stay indoors, away from the sun, and their vitamin D levels fall. Furthermore,
some studies have suggested that administering cod liver oil, which contains large amounts of vitamin D, can reduce the incidence of respiratory tract
infections.
Epidemic and Pandemic Spread
Prevention
Vaccination and Infection Control
Vaccination against influenza with a flu vaccine is strongly recommended for high-risk groups, such as children and the elderly. These vaccines can be
produced in several ways; the most common method is to grow the virus in fertilised hen eggs. After purification, the virus is inactivated (for example,
by treatment with detergent) to produce an inactivated-virus vaccine. Alternatively, the virus can be grown in eggs until it loses virulence and the
avirulent virus given as a live vaccine. The effectiveness of these flu vaccines is variable. Due to the high mutation rate of the virus, a particular
flu vaccine usually confers protection for no more than a few years. Every year, the World Health Organization predicts which strains of the virus are
most likely to be circulating in the next year, allowing pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccines that will provide the best immunity against these
strains. Vaccines have also been developed to protect poultry from avian influenza. These vaccines can be effective against multiple strains and are
used either as part of a preventative strategy, or combined with culling in attempts to eradicate outbreaks.
It is possible to get vaccinated and still get influenza. The vaccine is reformulated each season for a few specific flu strains, but cannot possibly
include all the strains actively infecting people in the world for that season. It takes about six months for the manufacturers to formulate and
produce the millions of doses required to deal with the seasonal epidemics; occasionally, a new or overlooked strain becomes prominent during that
time and infects people although they have been vaccinated (as by the H3N2 Fujian flu in the 2003–2004 flu season). It is also possible to get infected
just before vaccination and get sick with the very strain that the vaccine is supposed to prevent, as the vaccine takes about two weeks to become
effective.
Vaccination is most important in vulnerable populations, such as children or the elderly. The 2006–2007 season is the first in which the CDC has
recommended that children younger than 59 months receive the annual flu vaccine. Vaccines can cause the immune system to react as if the body were
actually being infected, and general infection symptoms (many
cold and flu symptoms are just general infection symptoms) can appear, though these
symptoms are usually not as severe or long-lasting as influenza. The most dangerous side-effect is a severe allergic reaction to either the virus
material itself, or residues from the hen eggs used to grow the influenza; however, these reactions are extremely rare.
Good personal health and hygiene habits are reasonably effective in avoiding and minimizing influenza. People who contract influenza are most infective
between the second and third days after infection and infectivity lasts for around 10 days. Children are notably more infectious than adults, and shed
virus from just before they develop symptoms until 2 weeks after infection.
Since influenza spreads through aerosols and contact with contaminated surfaces, it is important to persuade people to cover their mouths while sneezing
and to wash their hands regularly. Surface sanitizing is recommended in areas where influenza may be present on surfaces. Alcohol is an effective
sanitizer against influenza viruses, while quaternary ammonium compounds can be used with alcohol, to increase the duration of the sanitizing action.
In hospitals, quaternary ammonium compounds and halogen-releasing agents such as sodium hypochlorite are commonly used to sanitize rooms or equipment
that have been occupied by patients with influenza symptoms. During past pandemics, closing schools, churches and theaters slowed the spread of the
virus but did not have a large effect on the overall death rate.
Treatment
People with the flu are advised to get plenty of rest, drink a lot of liquids, avoid using alcohol and tobacco and, if necessary, take medications
such as paracetamol (acetaminophen) to relieve the fever and muscle aches associated with the flu. Children and teenagers with flu symptoms (particularly
fever) should avoid taking aspirin during an influenza infection (especially influenza type B) because doing so can lead to Reye's syndrome, a rare
but potentially fatal disease of the liver. Since influenza is caused by a virus, antibiotics have no effect on the infection; unless prescribed
for secondary infections such as bacterial pneumonia, they may lead to resistant bacteria. Antiviral medication is sometimes effective, but viruses
can develop resistance to the standard antiviral drugs.
The two classes of anti-virals are neuraminidase inhibitors and M2 inhibitors (adamantane derivatives). Neuraminidase inhibitors are currently
preferred for flu virus infections. The CDC recommended against using M2 inhibitors during the 2005–06 influenza season.
Neuraminidase Inhibitors
Antiviral drugs such as oseltamivir (trade name Tamiflu) and zanamivir (trade name Relenza) are neuraminidase inhibitors that are designed to halt the
spread of the virus in the body. These drugs are often effective against both influenza A and B. The Cochrane Collaboration reviewed these drugs and
concluded that they reduce symptoms and complications. Different strains of influenza virus have differing degrees of resistance against these
antivirals and it is impossible to predict what degree of resistance a future pandemic strain might have.
M2 Inhibitors (Adamantanes)
The antiviral drugs amantadine and rimantadine are designed to block a viral ion channel and prevent the virus from infecting cells. These drugs are
sometimes effective against influenza A if given early in the infection, but are always ineffective against influenza B. Measured resistance to
amantadine and rimantadine in American isolates of H3N2 has increased to 91% in 2005.
Research
Research on influenza includes studies on molecular virology, how the virus produces disease (pathogenesis), host immune responses, viral genomics,
and how the virus spreads (epidemiology). These studies help in developing influenza countermeasures; for example, a better understanding of the body's
immune response aids in vaccine development, and a detailed picture of how influenza invades cells aids in the development of antiviral drugs. One
important basic research program is the Influenza Genome Sequencing Project, which is creating a library of influenza sequences; this library should
help to clarify which factors make one strain more lethal than another, which genes most affect immunogenicity, and how the virus evolves over time.
Research into new vaccines is particularly important: as current vaccines are slow and expensive to produce and must be reformulated every year. The
sequencing of the influenza genome and recombinant DNA technology may accelerate the generation of new vaccine strains by allowing scientists to
substitute new antigens into a previously-developed vaccine strain. New technologies are also being developed to grow virus in cell culture; which
promises higher yields, less cost, better quality and surge capacity. The U.S. government has purchased from Sanofi Pasteur and Chiron Corporation
several million doses of vaccine meant to be used in case of an influenza pandemic of H5N1 avian influenza and is conducting clinical trials with
these vaccines.
Infection in Other Animals
Influenza infects many animal species and transfer of viral strains between species can occur. Birds are thought to be the main animal reservoirs of
influenza viruses. Sixteen forms of hemagglutinin and 9 forms of neuraminidase have been identified. All known subtypes (HxNy) are found in birds but
many subtypes are endemic in humans, dogs, horses, and pigs; populations of camels, ferrets, cats, seals, mink, and whales also show evidence of prior
infection or exposure to influenza. Variants of flu virus are sometimes named according to the species the strain is endemic in or adapted to. The
main variants named using this convention are: Bird flu, Human Flu, Swine Flu, Horse Flu and Dog Flu. (Cat flu generally refers to Feline viral
rhinotracheitis or Feline calicivirus and not infection from an influenza virus.) In pigs, horses and dogs, influenza symptoms are similar to humans,
with cough, fever and loss of appetite. The frequency of animal diseases are not as well-studied as human infection, but an outbreak of influenza in
harbour seals caused approximately 500 seal deaths off the New England coast in 1979–1980. On the other hand, outbreaks in pigs are common and do not
cause severe mortality.
Flu symptoms in birds are variable and can be unspecific. The symptoms following infection with low-pathogenicity avian influenza may be as mild as
ruffled feathers, a small reduction in egg production, or weight loss combined with minor respiratory disease. Since these mild symptoms can make
diagnosis in the field difficult, tracking the spread of avian influenza requires laboratory testing of samples from infected birds. Some strains
such as Asian H9N2 are highly virulent to poultry, and may cause more extreme symptoms and significant mortality. In its most highly pathogenic form,
influenza in chickens and turkeys produces a sudden appearance of severe symptoms and almost 100% mortality within two days. As the virus spreads
rapidly in the crowded conditions seen in the intensive farming of chickens and turkeys, these outbreaks can cause large economic losses to poultry
farmers.
An avian-adapted, highly pathogenic strain of H5N1 (called HPAI A(H5N1), for "highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of type A of subtype H5N1")
causes H5N1 flu, commonly known as "avian influenza" or simply "bird flu", and is endemic in many bird populations, especially in Southeast Asia.
This Asian lineage strain of HPAI A(H5N1) is spreading globally. It is epizootic (an epidemic in non-humans) and panzootic (a disease affecting
animals of many species, especially over a wide area) killing tens of millions of birds and spurring the culling of hundreds of millions of other
birds in an attempt to control its spread. Most references in the media to "bird flu" and most references to H5N1 are about this specific strain.
At present, HPAI A(H5N1) is an avian disease and there is no evidence suggesting efficient human-to-human transmission of HPAI A(H5N1). In almost
all cases, those infected have had extensive physical contact with infected birds. In the future, H5N1 may mutate or reassort into a strain capable
of efficient human-to-human transmission. Due to its high lethality and virulence, its endemic presence, and its large and increasing biological host
reservoir, the H5N1 virus is the world's pandemic threat in the 2006–7 flu season, and billions of dollars are being raised and spent researching
H5N1 and preparing for a potential influenza pandemic.
Economic Impact
Influenza produces direct costs due to lost productivity and associated medical treatment, as well as indirect costs of preventative measures. In
the United States, influenza is responsible for a total cost of over $10 billion per year, while it has been estimated that a future pandemic could
cause hundreds of billions of dollars in direct and indirect costs. However, the economic impact of past pandemics have not been intensively
studied, and some authors have suggested that the Spanish influenza actually had a positive long-term effect on per-capita income growth, despite a
large reduction in the working population and severe short-term depressive effects. Other studies have attempted to predict the costs of a
pandemic as serious as the 1918 Spanish flu on the U.S. economy, where 30% of all workers became ill, and 2.5% were killed. A 30% sickness rate and
a three-week length of illness would decrease gross domestic product by 5%. Additional costs would come from medical treatment of 18 million to 45
million people, and total economic costs would be approximately $700 billion.
Preventative costs are also high. Governments worldwide have spent billions of U.S. dollars preparing and planning for a potential H5N1 avian
influenza pandemic, with costs associated with purchasing drugs and vaccines as well as developing disaster drills and strategies for improved border
controls. On November 1, 2005, President George W. Bush unveiled the National Strategy to Safeguard Against the Danger of Pandemic Influenza backed
by a request to Congress for $7.1 billion to begin implementing the plan. Internationally, on January 18, 2006 donor nations pledged US$2 billion
to combat bird flu at the two-day International Pledging Conference on Avian and Human Influenza held in China.
Up to 2006, over ten billion dollars have been spent and over two hundred million birds have been killed to try to contain H5N1 avian influenza.
However, as these efforts have been largely ineffective at controlling the spread of the virus, other approaches are being tried: for example, the
Vietnamese government in 2005 adopted a combination of mass poultry vaccination, disinfecting, culling, information campaigns and bans on live
poultry in cities. As a result of such measures, the cost of poultry farming has increased, while the cost to consumers has gone down due to
demand for poultry falling below supply. This has resulted in devastating losses for many farmers. Poor poultry farmers cannot afford mandated
measures which keep their bird livestock from contact with wild birds (and other measures), thus risking losing their livelihood altogether.
Multinational poultry farming is increasingly becoming unprofitable as H5N1 avian influenza becomes endemic in wild birds worldwide. Financial
ruin for poor poultry farmers, which can be as severe as threatening starvation, has caused some to commit suicide and many others to stop cooperating
with efforts to deal with this virus – further increasing the human toll, the spread of the disease, and the chances of a pandemic mutation.
(adapted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flu)
Authors: Moffat JC, Vijayvergiya V, Gao FP, Cross TA, Woodbury DJ, Busath D.
Brigham Young University.
Influenza A virus M2 protein is known to form acid-activated, proton-selective, amantadine-sensitive channels. We have directly measured proton uptake
in vesicles containing reconstituted M2 by monitoring external pH after addition of valinomycin to vesicles with 100-fold diluted external [K(+)].
Proton uptake was not significantly altered by acidification. Under neutral conditions, external addition of 1 mM amantadine produced a reduction in
flux consistent with randomly ordered channels, however experimental variation is high with this method and the block was not statistically
significant. Amantadine block was reduced at pH 5.4. In accord with a previous study of reconstituted M2 using a pH sensitive dye to monitor
intravesicular pH (1), we conclude that bath pH weakly affects or does not significantly affect proton flow in the pH range of 5.4 -7.0 for the
reconstituted system, contrary to results from electrophysiological studies. Theoretical analysis of the relaxation to Donnan equilibrium utilized
for such vesicle uptake assays illuminates the appropriate time scale of the initial slope and an important limitation that must be placed on
inferences about channel ion selectivity. The rise in pH over 10 seconds after ionophore addition yielded time-averaged single channel conductances
0.35 +/- 0.20 aS and 0.72 +/- 0.42 aS at pH 5.4 and 7.0, respectively, an order of magnitude lower than was previously reported in vesicles.
Assuming complete membrane incorporation and tetramerization of the reconstituted protein, such a low time-average conductance in the face of the
previously observed single channel conductance (6 pS at pH 3) implies a channel Po of 10(-6) - 10(-4). Based on leakage of potassium from M2 containing
vesicles versus protein free vesicles, M2 exhibits ~10(7) selectivity for hydrogen over potassium.
Journal: Biophys J. 2007 Sep 7;
Authors: Mody L, Cinti S.
Divisions of Geriatric Medicine, and Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Avian influenza or Influenza A (H5N1) is caused by a viral strain that occurs naturally in wild birds, but to which humans are immunologically naïve.
If an influenza pandemic occurs, it is expected to have dire consequences, including millions of deaths, social disruption, and enormous economic
consequences. The Department of Health and Human Resources plan, released in November 2005, clearly affirms the threat of a pandemic. Anticipating a
disruption in many factions of society, every segment of the healthcare industry, including nursing homes, will be affected and will need to be
self-sufficient. Disruption of vaccine distribution during the seasonal influenza vaccine shortage during the 2004/05 influenza season is but one
example of erratic emergency planning. Nursing homes will have to make vital decisions and provide care to older adults who will not be on the initial
priority list for vaccine. At the same time, nursing homes will face an anticipated shortage of antiviral medications and be expected to provide
surge capacity for overwhelmed hospitals. This article provides an overview of current recommendations for pandemic preparedness and the potential
effect of a pandemic on the nursing home industry. It highlights the need for collaborative planning and dialogue between nursing homes and various
stakeholders already heavily invested in pandemic preparedness.
Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Sep;55(9):1431-7.
Authors: Uscher-Pines L, Barnett DJ, Sapsin JW, Bishai DM, Balicer RD.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Suite 492, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to apply SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) to a domestic shortage of influenza
vaccine, to identify lessons learned, and to generate effective solutions for future public health rationing emergencies. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:
SWOT and TOWS techniques were employed to characterize the vulnerability of the USA to disruptions in the supply of influenza vaccine. A group of
five researchers reviewed relevant literature, engaged in group brainstorming, and categorized elements according to the SWOT framework. RESULTS:
Three strengths, five weaknesses, five threats and seven opportunities were identified in the areas of vaccine production, purchasing and distribution,
and provision. Four future recommendations emerged with respect to government investment, communications, sanctioning of physicians, and incident
command. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the SWOT technique is highly relevant to the health policy realm and can assist public health planners in
planning for future resource scarcity.
Journal: Public Health. 2007 Sep 6
Authors: Glass K, Barnes B.
From the National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health; Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
BACKGROUND:: When deciding whether to close schools during an influenza pandemic, authorities must weigh the likely benefits against the expected
social disruption. Although schools have been closed to slow the spread of influenza, there is limited evidence as to the impact on transmission of
disease. METHODS:: To assess the benefits of closing schools for various pandemic scenarios, we used a stochastic mathematical model of disease
transmission fitted to attack rates from past influenza pandemics. We compared these benefits with those achieved by other interventions targeted
at children. RESULTS:: Closing schools can reduce transmission among children considerably, but has only a moderate impact on average transmission
rates among all individuals (both adults and children) under most scenarios. Much of the benefit of closing schools can be achieved if schools are
closed by the time that 2% of children are infected; if the intervention is delayed until 20% of children are infected, there is little benefit.
Immunization of all school children provides only a slight improvement over closing schools, indicating that schools are an important venue for
transmission between children. Relative attack rates in adults and children provide a good indication of the likely benefit of closing schools, with
the greatest impact seen for infections with high attack rates in children. CONCLUSIONS:: Closing schools is effective at reducing transmission
between children but has only a moderate effect on average transmission rates in the wider population unless children are disproportionately
affected.
Journal: Epidemiology. 2007 Sep;18(5):623-8.
Authors: Lewis EN, Griffin MR, Szilagyi PG, Zhu Y, Edwards KM, Poehling KA.
Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
OBJECTIVE: The goal was to assess the potential benefits of the influenza vaccine recommendations for children 6 to 59 months of age by estimating the
number of children needed to be vaccinated to prevent 1 hospitalization or 1 outpatient visit attributable to influenza. METHODS: The influenza burden
was obtained from published studies in which rates for children 6 to 23 months and 24 to 59 months of age could be ascertained. We assumed a range of
influenza vaccine efficacies of 25% to 75%, consistent with the literature. We estimated the number of children who needed to be vaccinated to prevent
1 influenza-attributable hospitalization or 1 outpatient visit for each age group. RESULTS: As both vaccine efficacy and severity of the influenza
season increased, the number of children who needed to be vaccinated to prevent 1 hospitalization or 1 outpatient visit decreased. The numbers of
children who needed to be vaccinated to prevent 1 hospitalization in a year with 50% vaccine efficacy ranged from 1031 to 3050 for children 6 to 23
months of age and from 4255 to 6897 for children 24 to 59 months of age. For every 12 to 42 children 6 to 59 months of age vaccinated in a year with
50% vaccine efficacy, we estimated that 1 influenza-attributable outpatient visit would be prevented. CONCLUSIONS: With 1 outpatient visit being
prevented through vaccination of <50 children, influenza vaccination can reduce influenza-attributable medical visits in children significantly,
even in years with modest vaccine efficacy.
Journal: Pediatrics. 2007 Sep;120(3):467-72.
Authors: Fornek JL, Korth MJ, Katze MG.
Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195.
Infection with influenza typically results in mild-to-moderate illness in healthy individuals; however, it is responsible for 30,000-40,000 deaths
each year in the United States. In extreme cases, such as the influenza pandemic of 1918, tens of millions of people have died from the infection. To
prepare for future influenza outbreaks, it is necessary to understand how the virus interacts with the host and to determine what makes certain strains
of influenza highly pathogenic. Functional genomics provides a unique approach to this effort by allowing researchers to examine the effect of influenza
infection on global host mRNA levels. Researchers are making increasing use of this approach to study virus-host interactions using a variety of model
systems. For example, data obtained using microarray technology, in combination with mouse and macaque infection models, is providing exciting new
insights into the pathogenicity of the 1918 virus. These studies suggest that the lethality associated with this virus is in part due to an aberrant
and unchecked immune response. Progress is also being made toward using functional genomics in the diagnosis and prognosis of acute lung infections and
in the development of more effective influenza vaccines and antivirals.
Journal: Adv Virus Res. 2007;70:81-100.
Authors: Gazmararian JA, Coleman M, Prill M, Hinman AR, Ribner BS, Washington ML, Janssen A, Orenstein WA.
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
BACKGROUND: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has long recommended that health care workers receive annual influenza vaccinations to
prevent transmission of disease to vulnerable patients, but HCW vaccination rates remain low, and there is little information about hospital policies
promoting employee vaccination. METHODS: Our objective was to collect information about and compare hospital influenza vaccination policies and
practices regarding health care workers in the metropolitan Atlanta community and identify relationships between policies and practices and employee
coverage rates. Senior staff of infection control and of employee health programs at 12 hospitals in the metropolitan Atlanta community completed an
in-person interview using a structured guide. RESULTS: All study hospitals provided vaccine free of charge to employees in on-site clinics. Seven of
the 9 hospitals clustered between 34% and 47% of their employees vaccinated, with an average of 41%. The hospitals that included flexibility and better
accessibility, such as providing vaccination carts and adding more hours of vaccine availability, had somewhat higher hospital employee vaccination
rates. Personal contact in the form of educational presentations appears to have more influence on employee decisions than distributing printed
educational materials. CONCLUSION: Hospitals in the Atlanta community had several similar policies and practices to improve immunization coverage of
their staff. Human interactions with employees as well as ease of vaccine access may be more successful at increasing coverage rates than mass
approaches such as posters or flyers.
Journal: Am J Infect Control. 2007 Sep;35(7):441-7.
- Become a free member and get notified about studies in your area when they become available.
- Look over all of our current studies being conducted throughout the United States.