Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer is a disease in which
cancer develops in the prostate, a gland in the male reproductive system.
cancer occurs when cells of the
prostate mutate and begin to multiply out of control. These cells may spread (metastasize) from the prostate to other parts of the body, especially the
bones and lymph nodes. Prostate cancer may cause
pain, difficulty in urinating, erectile dysfunction and other symptoms.
Rates of prostate cancer vary widely across the world. Although the rates vary widely between countries, it is least common in South and East Asia, more
common in Europe, and most common in the United States. According to the American Cancer Society, prostate cancer is least common among Asian men and
most common among black men, with figures for European men in-between. However, these high rates may be affected by increasing rates of detection.
Prostate cancer develops most frequently in men over fifty. This
cancer can occur only in men, as the prostate is exclusively of the male reproductive
tract. It is the most common type of
cancer in men in the United States, where it is responsible for more male deaths than any other cancer, except lung
cancer. However, many men who develop prostate cancer never have symptoms, undergo no therapy, and eventually die of other causes. Many factors, including
genetics and diet, have been implicated in the development of prostate cancer.
Prostate cancer is most often discovered by physical examination or by screening blood tests, such as the PSA (prostate specific antigen) test. There is
some current concern about the accuracy of the PSA test and its usefulness. Suspected prostate cancer is typically confirmed by removing a piece of the
prostate (biopsy) and examining it under a microscope. Further tests, such as X-rays and bone scans, may be performed to determine whether prostate
cancer has spread.
Prostate cancer can be treated with surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, occasionally chemotherapy, proton therapy, or some combination of these.
The age and underlying health of the man as well as the extent of spread, appearance under the microscope, and response of the
cancer to initial treatment
are important in determining the outcome of the disease. Since prostate cancer is a disease of older men, many will die of other causes before a slowly
advancing prostate cancer can spread or cause symptoms. This makes treatment selection difficult. The decision whether or not to treat localized
prostate cancer (a tumor that is contained within the prostate) with curative intent is a patient trade-off between the expected beneficial and harmful
effects in terms of patient survival and quality of life.
Current Research
For current research articles click
- here
Prostate
The prostate is a male reproductive organ which helps make and store seminal fluid. In adult men a typical prostate is about three centimeters long and
weighs about twenty grams. It is located in the pelvis, under the urinary bladder and in front of the rectum. The prostate surrounds part of the
urethra, the tube that carries urine from the bladder during urination and semen during ejaculation. Because of its location, prostate diseases often
affect urination, ejaculation, and rarely defecation. The prostate contains many small glands which make about twenty percent of the fluid comprising
semen. In prostate cancer the cells of these prostate glands mutate into
cancer cells. The prostate glands require male hormones, known as androgens,
to work properly. Androgens include testosterone, which is made in the testes; dehydroepiandrosterone, made in the adrenal glands; and dihydrotestosterone,
which is converted from testosterone within the prostate itself. Androgens are also responsible for secondary sex characteristics such as facial hair
and increased muscle mass.
Symptoms
Early prostate cancer usually causes no symptoms. Often it is diagnosed during the workup for an elevated PSA noticed during a routine checkup. Sometimes,
however, prostate cancer does cause symptoms, often similar to those of diseases such as benign prostatic hypertrophy. These include frequent urination,
increased urination at night, difficulty starting and maintaining a steady stream of urine, blood in the urine, and painful urination. Prostate cancer
may also cause
sexual dysfunction, such as difficulty achieving erection or painful ejaculation.
Advanced prostate cancer may cause additional symptoms as the disease spreads to other parts of the body. The most common symptom is bone
pain, often in
the vertebrae (bones of the spine), pelvis or ribs, from
cancer which has spread to these bones. Prostate cancer in the spine can also compress the spinal
cord, causing leg weakness and urinary and fecal incontinence.
Pathophysiology
Prostate cancer is classified as an adenocarcinoma, or glandular cancer, that begins when normal semen-secreting prostate gland cells mutate into
cancer
cells. The region of prostate gland where the adenocarcinoma is most common is the peripheral zone. Initially, small clumps of
cancer cells remain
confined to otherwise normal prostate glands, a condition known as carcinoma in situ or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Although there is no
proof that PIN is a cancer precursor, it is closely associated with cancer. Over time these cancer cells begin to multiply and spread to the surrounding
prostate tissue (the stroma) forming a tumor. Eventually, the tumor may grow large enough to invade nearby organs such as the seminal vesicles or the
rectum, or the tumor cells may develop the ability to travel in the bloodstream and lymphatic system. Prostate cancer is considered a malignant tumor
because it is a mass of cells which can invade other parts of the body. This invasion of other organs is called metastasis. Prostate cancer most commonly
metastasizes to the bones, lymph nodes, rectum, and bladder.
Aetiology
The specific causes of prostate cancer remain unknown. A man's risk of developing prostate cancer is related to his age, genetics, race, diet, lifestyle,
medications, and other factors. The primary risk factor is age. Prostate cancer is uncommon in men less than 45, but becomes more common with advancing
age. The average age at the time of diagnosis is 70. However, many men never know they have prostate cancer. Autopsy studies of Chinese, German,
Israeli, Jamaican, Swedish, and Ugandan men who died of other causes have found prostate cancer in thirty percent of men in their 50s, and in eighty
percent of men in their 70s. In the year 2005 in the United States, there were an estimated 230,000 new cases of prostate cancer and 30,000 deaths
due to prostate cancer.
A man's genetic background contributes to his risk of developing prostate cancer. This is suggested by an increased incidence of prostate cancer found in
certain racial groups, in identical twins of men with prostate cancer, and in men with certain genes. In the United States, prostate cancer more commonly
affects black men than white or Hispanic men, and is also more deadly in black men. Men who have a brother or father with prostate cancer have twice
the usual risk of developing prostate cancer. Studies of twins in Scandinavia suggest that forty percent of prostate cancer risk can be explained by
inherited factors. However, no single gene is responsible for prostate cancer; many different genes have been implicated. Two genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2)
that are important risk factors for ovarian cancer and breast cancer in women have also been implicated in prostate cancer.
Dietary amounts of certain foods, vitamins, and minerals can contribute to prostate cancer risk. Men with higher serum levels of the short-chain ω-6 fatty
acid linoleic acid have higher rates of prostate cancer. However, the same series of studies showed that men with elevated levels of long-chain ω-3 (EPA
and DHA) had lowered incidence. A long-term study reports that "blood levels of trans fatty acids, in particular trans fats resulting from the
hydrogenation of vegetable oils, are associated with an increased prostate cancer risk." Other dietary factors that may increase prostate cancer
risk include low intake of vitamin E (Vitamin E is found in green, leafy vegetables), lycopene (found in tomatoes), omega-3 fatty acids (found in fatty
fishes like salmon), and the mineral selenium. A study in 2007 cast doubt on the effectiveness of lycopene (found in tomatoes) in reducing the risk of
prostate cancer. Lower blood levels of vitamin D also may increase the risk of developing prostate cancer. This may be linked to lower exposure to
ultraviolet (UV) light, since UV light exposure can increase vitamin D in the body.
There are also some links between prostate cancer and medications, medical procedures, and medical conditions. Daily use of anti-inflammatory medicines
such as aspirin, ibuprofen, or naproxen may decrease prostate cancer risk. Use of the cholesterol-lowering drugs known as the statins may also
decrease prostate cancer risk. More frequent ejaculation also may decrease a man's risk of prostate cancer. One study showed that men who ejaculated
five times a week in their 20s had a decreased rate of prostate cancer, though others have shown no benefit. Infection or inflammation of the prostate
(prostatitis) may increase the chance for prostate cancer. In particular, infection with the sexually transmitted infections chlamydia, gonorrhea, or
syphilis seems to increase risk. Finally,
obesity and elevated blood levels of testosterone may increase the risk for prostate cancer.
Research released in May 2007, found that US war veterans who had been exposed to Agent Orange had a 48% increased risk of prostate cancer recurrence
following surgery.
Prostate cancer risk can be decreased by modifying known risk factors for prostate cancer, such as decreasing intake of animal fat.
Prevention
Several medications and vitamins may also help prevent prostate cancer. Two dietary supplements, vitamin E and selenium, may help prevent prostate cancer
when taken daily. Estrogens from fermented soybeans and other plant sources (called phytoestrogens) may also help prevent prostate cancer. The selective
estrogen receptor modulator drug toremifene has shown promise in early trials. Two medications which block the conversion of testosterone to
dihydrotestosterone, finasteride and dutasteride, have also shown some promise. As of 2006 the use of these medications for primary prevention
is still in the testing phase, and they are not widely used for this purpose. The problem with these medications is that they may preferentially block
the development of lower-grade prostate tumors, leading to a relatively greater chance of higher grade
cancers , and negating any overall survival
improvement. Green tea may be protective (due to its polyphenol content), though the data is mixed. A 2006 study of green tea derivatives
demonstrated promising prostate cancer prevention in patients at high risk for the disease. In 2003, an Australian research team led by Graham Giles of
The Cancer Council Australia concluded that frequent masturbation by males appears to help prevent the development of prostate cancer. Recent research
published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute suggests that taking multivitamins more than seven times a week can increase the risks of
contracting the disease. This research was unable to highlight the exact vitamins responsible for this increase (almost double), although they suggest
that vitamin A, vitamin E and beta-carotene may lie at its heart. It is advised that those taking multivitamins never exceed the stated daily dose on
the label. Scientists recommend a healthy, well balanced diet rich in fiber, and to reduce intake of meat.
Screening
Prostate cancer screening is an attempt to find unsuspected cancers. Screening tests may lead to more specific follow-up tests such as a biopsy, where
small pieces of the prostate are removed for closer study. As of 2006 prostate cancer screening options include the digital rectal exam and the prostate
specific antigen (PSA) blood test. Screening for prostate cancer is controversial because it is not clear if the benefits of screening outweigh the risks
of follow-up diagnostic tests and
cancer treatments.
Prostate cancer is a slow-growing
cancer, very common among older men. In fact, most prostate cancers never grow to the point where they cause symptoms,
and most men with prostate cancer die of other causes before prostate cancer has an impact on their lives. The PSA screening test may detect these small
cancers that would never become life threatening. Doing the PSA test in these men may lead to overdiagnosis, including additional testing and treatment.
Follow-up tests, such as prostate biopsy, may cause
pain, bleeding and infection. Prostate cancer treatments may cause urinary incontinence and erectile
dysfunction. Therefore, it is essential that the risks and benefits of diagnostic procedures and treatment be carefully considered before PSA screening.
Prostate cancer screening generally begins after age 50, but this can vary due to ethnic backgrounds. An example of this is African American men, who have
the highest overall rate of prostate cancer. It has thus been recommended to begin screening checks at age 35, especially for African American
males who have a strong family history of prostate cancer. The American Academy of Family Physicians and American College of Physicians recommend
the physician discuss the risks and benefits of screening and decide based on individual patient preference. Although there is no officially
recommended cutoff, many health care providers stop monitoring PSA in men who are older than 75 years old because of concern that prostate cancer therapy
may do more harm than good as age progresses and life expectancy decreases.
Digital Rectal Examination
Digital rectal examination (DRE) is a procedure where the examiner inserts a gloved, lubricated finger into the rectum to check the size, shape, and
texture of the prostate. Areas which are irregular, hard or lumpy need further evaluation, since they may contain
cancer. Although the DRE only evaluates
the back of the prostate, 85% of prostate cancers arise in this part of the prostate. Prostate cancer which can be felt on DRE is generally more advanced.
The use of DRE has never been shown to prevent prostate cancer deaths when used as the only screening test.
Prostate Specific Antigen
The PSA test measures the blood level of prostate-specific antigen, an enzyme produced by the prostate. Specifically, PSA is a serine protease similar
to kallikrein. Its normal function is to liquify gelatinous semen after ejaculation, allowing spermatazoa to more easily "swim" through the uterine
cervix.
PSA levels under 4 ng/mL (nanograms per milliliter) are generally considered normal, while levels over 4 ng/mL are considered abnormal (although in
men over 65 levels up to 6.5 ng/mL may be acceptable, depending upon each laboratory's reference ranges). PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL indicate a
risk of prostate cancer higher than normal, but the risk does not seem to rise within this six-point range. When the PSA level is above 10 ng/mL, the
association with
cancer becomes stronger. However, PSA is not a perfect test. Some men with prostate cancer do not have an elevated PSA, and most men
with an elevated PSA do not have prostate cancer.
PSA levels can change for many reasons other than
cancer. Two common causes of high PSA levels are enlargement of the prostate (benign prostatic
hypertrophy (BPH)) and infection in the prostate (prostatitis). It can also be raised for 24 hours after ejaculation and several days after
catheterization. PSA levels are lowered in men who use medications used to treat BPH or baldness. These medications, finasteride (marketed as Proscar
or Propecia) and dutasteride (marketed as Avodart), may decrease the PSA levels by 50% or more.
Several other ways of evaluating the PSA have been developed to avoid the shortcomings of simple PSA screening.. The use of age-specific reference
ranges improves the sensitivity and specificity of the test. The rate of rise of the PSA over time, called the PSA velocity, has been used to evaluate
men with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/ml, but as of 2006, it has not proven to be an effective screening test. Comparing the PSA level with the
size of the prostate, as measured by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, has also been studied. This comparison, called PSA density, is both costly
and, as of 2006, has not proven to be an effective screening test. PSA in the blood may either be free or bound to other proteins. Measuring the
amount of PSA which is free or bound may provide additional screening information, but as of 2006, questions regarding the usefulness of these
measurements limit their widespread use.
Diagnosis
When a man has symptoms of prostate cancer, or a screening test indicates an increased risk for
cancer, more invasive evaluation is offered. The only
test which can fully confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer is a biopsy, the removal of small pieces of the prostate for microscopic examination.
However, prior to a biopsy, several other tools may be used to gather more information about the prostate and the urinary tract. Cystoscopy shows the
urinary tract from inside the bladder, using a thin, flexible camera tube inserted down the urethra. Transrectal ultrasonography creates a picture of
the prostate using sound waves from a probe in the rectum.
If
cancer is suspected, a biopsy is offered. During a biopsy a urologist obtains tissue samples from the prostate via the rectum. A biopsy gun inserts
and removes special hollow-core needles (usually three to six on each side of the prostate) in less than a second. The tissue samples are then examined
under a microscope to determine whether cancer cells are present, and to evaluate the microscopic features (or Gleason score) of any
cancer found.
Prostate biopsies are routinely done on an outpatient basis and rarely require hospitalization. Fifty-five percent of men report discomfort during
prostate biopsy.
Currently, an active area of research involves non-invasive methods of prostate tumor detection. Adenoviruses modified to transfect tumor cells with
harmless yet distinct genes (such as luciferase) have proven capable of early detection. So far, though, this area of research has only been tested in
animal and LNCaP models.
Another potential non-invasive methods of early prostate tumor detection is through a molecular test that detects the presence of cell-associated PCA3
mRNA in urine. PCA3 mRNA is expressed almost exclusively by prostate cells and has been shown to be highly over-expressed in prostate cancer cells.
It was reported in April 2007 that a new blood test for early prostate cancer antigen-2 (EPCA-2) is being researched that may alert men if they have
prostate cancer and how aggressive it will be.
Staging
An important part of evaluating prostate cancer is determining the stage, or how far the
cancer has spread. Knowing the stage helps define prognosis
and is useful when selecting therapies. The most common system is the four-stage TNM system (abbreviated from Tumor/Nodes/Metastases). Its components
include the size of the tumor, the number of involved lymph nodes, and the presence of any other metastases.
The most important distinction made by any staging system is whether or not the
cancer is still confined to the prostate. In the TNM system, clinical T1
and T2 cancers are found only in the prostate, while T3 and T4 cancers have spread elsewhere. Several tests can be used to look for evidence of spread.
These include computed tomography to evaluate spread within the pelvis, bone scans to look for spread to the bones, and endorectal coil magnetic resonance
imaging to closely evaluate the prostatic capsule and the seminal vesicles. Bone scans should reveal osteoblastic appearance due to increased bone
density in the areas of bone metastisis - opposite to what is found in many other cancers that metastisize.
After a prostate biopsy, a pathologist looks at the samples under a microscope. If
cancer is present, the pathologist reports the grade of the tumor. The
grade tells how much the tumor tissue differs from normal prostate tissue and suggests how fast the tumor is likely to grow. The Gleason system is used
to grade prostate tumors from 2 to 10, where a Gleason score of 10 indicates the most abnormalities. The pathologist assigns a number from 1 to 5 for
the most common pattern observed under the microscope, then does the same for the second most common pattern. The sum of these two numbers is the Gleason
score. The Whitmore-Jewett stage is another method sometimes used. Proper grading of the tumor is critical, since the grade of the tumor is one of the
major factors used to determine the treatment recommendation.
Risk Assessment
Many prostate cancers are not destined to be lethal, and most men will ultimately die from causes other than of the disease. Decisions about treatment
type and timing may therefore be informed by an estimation of the risk that the tumor will ultimately recur after treatment and/or progress to metastases
and mortality. Several tools are available to help predict outcomes such as pathologic stage and recurrence after surgery or radiation therapy. Most
combine stage, grade, and PSA level, and some also add the number or percent of biopsy cores positive, age, and/or other information.
The D’Amico classification stratifies men to low, intermediate, or high risk based on stage, grade, and PSA. It is used widely in clinical practice and
research settings. The major downside to the 3-level system is that it does not account for multiple adverse parameters (e.g., high Gleason score and
high PSA) in stratifying patients.
The Partin tables predict pathologic outcomes (margin status, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion) based on the same 3 variables, and
are published as lookup tables.
The Kattan nomograms predict recurrence after surgery and/or radiation therapy, based on data available either at time of diagnosis or after surgery.
The nomograms can be calculated using paper graphs, or using software available on a website or for handheld computers. The Kattan score represents the
likelihood of remaining free of disease at a given time interval following treatment.
The UCSF
cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score predicts both pathologic status and recurrence after surgery. It offers comparable accuracy
as the Kattan preoperative nomogram, and can be calculated without paper tables or a calculator. Points are assigned based on PSA, Grade, stage, age,
and percent of cores positive; the sum yields a 0–10 score, with every 2 points representing roughly a doubling of risk of recurrence. The CAPRA score
was derived from community-based data in the CaPSURE database.
Treatment
Treatment for prostate cancer may involve watchful waiting, surgery, radiation therapy, High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU), chemotherapy,
cryosurgery, hormonal therapy, or some combination. Which option is best depends on the stage of the disease, the Gleason score, and the PSA level. Other
important factors are the man's age, his general health, and his feelings about potential treatments and their possible side effects. Because all
treatments can have significant side effects, such as erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, treatment discussions often focus on balancing
the goals of therapy with the risks of lifestyle alterations.
The selection of treatment options may be a complex decision involving many factors. For example, radical prostatectomy after primary radiation failure
is a very technically challenging surgery and may not be an option. This may enter into the treatment decision.
If the
cancer has spread beyond the prostate, treatment options significantly change, so most doctors who treat prostate cancer use a variety of nomograms
to predict the probability of spread. Treatment by watchful waiting, HIFU, radiation therapy, cryosurgery, and surgery are generally offered to men whose
cancer remains within the prostate. Hormonal therapy and chemotherapy are often reserved for disease which has spread beyond the prostate. However, there
are exceptions: radiation therapy may be used for some advanced tumors, and hormonal therapy is used for some early stage tumors. Cryotherapy, hormonal
therapy, and chemotherapy may also be offered if initial treatment fails and the cancer progresses.
Watchful Waiting and Active Surveillance
Watchful waiting, also called "active surveillance," refers to observation and regular monitoring without invasive treatment. Watchful waiting is often
used when an early stage, slow-growing prostate cancer is found in an older man. Watchful waiting may also be suggested when the risks of surgery,
radiation therapy, or hormonal therapy outweigh the possible benefits. Other treatments can be started if symptoms develop, or if there are signs that
the
cancer growth is accelerating (e.g., rapidly rising PSA, increase in Gleason score on repeat biopsy, etc.). Most men who choose watchful waiting for
early stage tumors eventually have signs of tumor progression, and they may need to begin treatment within three years. Although men who choose
watchful waiting avoid the risks of surgery and radiation, the risk of metastasis (spread of the cancer) may be increased. For younger men, a trial of
active surveillance may not mean avoiding treatment altogether, but may reasonably allow a delay of a few years or more, during which time the quality
of life impact of active treatment can be avoided. Published data to date suggest that carefully selected men will not miss a window for cure with this
approach. Additional health problems that develop with advancing age during the observation period can also make it harder to undergo surgery and
radiation therapy.
Clinically insignificant prostate tumors are often found by accident when a doctor incorrectly orders a biopsy not following the recommended guidelines
(abnormal DRE and elevated PSA). The urologist must check that the PSA is not elevated for other reasons, Prostatitis, etc. An annual biopsy is often
recommended by a urologist for a patient who has selected watchful waiting when the tumor is clinically insignificant (no abnormal DRE or PSA). The
tumors tiny size can be monitored this way and the patient can decide to have surgery only if the tumor enlarges which may take many years or never.
Surgery
Surgical removal of the prostate, or prostatectomy, is a common treatment either for early stage prostate cancer, or for cancer which has failed to
respond to radiation therapy. The most common type is radical retropubic prostatectomy, when the surgeon removes the prostate through an abdominal
incision. Another type is radical perineal prostatectomy, when the surgeon removes the prostate through an incision in the perineum, the skin between
the scrotum and anus. Radical prostatectomy can also be performed laparoscopically, through a series of small (1cm) incisions in the abdomen, with or
without the assistance of a surgical robot.
Radical prostatectomy is effective for tumors which have not spread beyond the prostate; cure rates depend on risk factors such as PSA level and
Gleason grade. However, it may cause nerve damage that significantly alters the quality of life of the prostate cancer survivor. The most common serious
complications are loss of urinary control and impotence. Reported rates of both complications vary widely depending on how they are assessed, by whom,
and how long after surgery, as well as the setting (e.g., academic series vs. community-based or population-based data). Although penile sensation and
the ability to achieve orgasm usually remain intact, erection and ejaculation are often impaired. Medications such as sildenafil (Viagra), tadalafil
(Cialis), or vardenafil (Levitra) may restore some degree of potency. For most men with organ-confined disease, a more limited "nerve-sparing" technique
may help avoid urinary incontinence and impotence.
Radical prostatectomy has traditionally been used alone when the
cancer is small. In the event of positive margins or locally advanced disease found on
pathology, adjuvant radiation therapy may offer improved survival. Surgery may also be offered when a cancer is not responding to radiation therapy.
However, because radiation therapy causes tissue changes, prostatectomy after radiation has a higher risk of complications.
Transurethral resection of the prostate, commonly called a "TURP," is a surgical procedure performed when the tube from the bladder to the penis
(urethra) is blocked by prostate enlargement. TURP is generally for benign disease and is not meant as definitive treatment for prostate cancer. During
a TURP, a small tube (cystoscope) is placed into the penis and the blocking prostate is cut away.
In metastatic disease, where
cancer has spread beyond the prostate, removal of the testicles (called orchiectomy) may be done to decrease testosterone
levels and control cancer growth. (See hormonal therapy, below).
Radiation Therapy
Radiation therapy, also known as radiotherapy, uses ionizing radiation to kill prostate cancer cells. When absorbed in tissue, Ionizing radiation such
as Gamma and x-rays damage the DNA in cells, which increases the probability of apoptosis (cell death). Two different kinds of radiation therapy are
used in prostate cancer treatment: external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy.
External beam radiation therapy uses a linear accelerator to produce high-energy x-rays which are directed in a beam towards the prostate. A technique
called Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) may be used to adjust the radiation beam to conform with the shape of the tumor, allowing higher
doses to be given to the prostate and seminal vesicles with less damage to the bladder and rectum. External beam radiation therapy is generally given
over several weeks, with daily visits to a radiation therapy center. New types of radiation therapy may have fewer side effects then traditional
treatment, one of these is Tomotherapy.
Permanent implant brachytherapy is a popular treatment choice for patients with low to intermediate risk features, can be performed on an outpatient
basis, and is associated with good 10-year outcomes with relatively low morbidity It involves the placement of about 100 small "seeds" containing
radioactive material (such as iodine-125 or palladium-103) with a needle through the skin of the perineum directly into the tumor while under spinal
or general anesthetic. These seeds emit lower-energy X-rays which are only able to travel a short distance. Although the seeds eventually become inert,
they remain in the prostate permanently. The risk of exposure to others from men with implanted seeds is generally accepted to be insignificant.
Radiation therapy is commonly used in prostate cancer treatment. It may be used instead of surgery for early cancers, and it may also be used in advanced
stages of prostate cancer to treat painful bone metastases. Radiation treatments also can be combined with hormonal therapy for intermediate risk disease,
when radiation therapy alone is less likely to cure the
cancer. Some radiation oncologists combine external beam radiation and brachytherapy for
intermediate to high risk situations. One study found that the combination of six months of androgen suppressive therapy combined with external beam
radiation had improved survival compared to radiation alone in patients with localized prostate cancer. Others use a "triple modality" combination
of external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and hormonal therapy.
Less common applications for radiotherapy are when
cancer is compressing the spinal cord, or sometimes after surgery, such as when cancer is found in
the seminal vesicles, in the lymph nodes, outside the prostate capsule, or at the margins of the biopsy.
Radiation therapy is often offered to men whose medical problems make surgery more risky. Radiation therapy appears to cure small tumors that are
confined to the prostate just about as well as surgery. However, as of 2006 some issues remain unresolved, such as whether radiation should be given
to the rest of the pelvis, how much the absorbed dose should be, and whether hormonal therapy should be given at the same time.
Side effects of radiation therapy might occur after a few weeks into treatment. Both types of radiation therapy may cause diarrhea and rectal bleeding
due to radiation proctitis, as well as urinary incontinence and impotence. Symptoms tend to improve over time. Men who have undergone external beam
radiation therapy will have a higher risk of later developing colon cancer and bladder cancer.
Cryosurgery
Cryosurgery is another method of treating prostate cancer. It is less invasive than radical prostatectomy, and general anesthesia is less commonly used.
Under ultrasound guidance, a method invented by Dr. Gary Onik, metal rods are inserted through the skin of the perineum into the prostate. Highly
purified Argon gas is used to cool the rods, freezing the surrounding tissue at −196 °C (−320 °F). As the water within the prostate cells freeze, the
cells die. The urethra is protected from freezing by a catheter filled with warm liquid. Cryosurgery generally causes fewer problems with urinary control
than other treatments, but impotence occurs up to ninety percent of the time. When used as the initial treatment for prostate cancer, cryosurgery is not
as effective as surgery or radiation. However, cryosurgery is potentially better than radical prostatectomy for recurrent
cancer following radiation
therapy.
Hormonal Therapy
Hormonal therapy uses medications or surgery to block prostate cancer cells from getting dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a hormone produced in the prostate
and required for the growth and spread of most prostate cancer cells. Blocking DHT often causes prostate cancer to stop growing and even shrink. However,
hormonal therapy rarely cures prostate cancer because cancers which initially respond to hormonal therapy typically become resistant after one to two
years. Hormonal therapy is therefore usually used when cancer has spread from the prostate. It may also be given to certain men undergoing radiation
therapy or surgery to help prevent return of their cancer.
Hormonal therapy for prostate cancer targets the pathways the body uses to produce DHT. A feedback loop involving the testicles, the hypothalamus, and
the pituitary, adrenal, and prostate glands controls the blood levels of DHT. First, low blood levels of DHT stimulate the hypothalamus to produce
gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). GnRH then stimulates the pituitary gland to produce luteinizing hormone (LH), and LH stimulates the testicles to
produce testosterone. Finally, testosterone from the testicles and dehydroepiandrosterone from the adrenal glands stimulate the prostate to produce
more DHT. Hormonal therapy can decrease levels of DHT by interrupting this pathway at any point.
There are several forms of hormonal therapy:
- Orchiectomy is surgery to remove the testicles. Because the testicles make most of the body's testosterone, after orchiectomy testosterone
levels drop. Now the prostate not only lacks the testosterone stimulus to produce DHT, but also it does not have enough testosterone to
transform into DHT.
- Antiandrogens are medications such as flutamide, bicalutamide, nilutamide, and cyproterone acetate which directly block the actions of
testosterone and DHT within prostate cancer cells.
- Medications which block the production of adrenal androgens such as DHEA include ketoconazole and aminoglutethimide. Because the adrenal
glands only make about 5% of the body's androgens, these medications are generally used only in combination with other methods that can
block the 95% of androgens made by the testicles. These combined methods are called total androgen blockade (TAB). TAB can also be
achieved using antiandrogens.
- GnRH action can be interrupted in one of two ways. GnRH antagonists suppress the production of LH directly, while GnRH agonists suppress LH
through the process of downregulation after an initial stimulation effect. Abarelix is an example of a GnRH antagonist, while the GnRH
agonists include leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin, and buserelin. Initially, GnRH agonists increase the production of LH. However,
because the constant supply of the medication does not match the body's natural production rhythm, production of both LH and GnRH
decreases after a few weeks.
As of 2006 the most successful hormonal treatments are orchiectomy and GnRH agonists. Despite their higher cost, GnRH agonists are often chosen over
orchiectomy for cosmetic and emotional reasons. Eventually, total androgen blockade may prove to be better than orchiectomy or GnRH agonists used
alone.
Each treatment has disadvantages which limit its use in certain circumstances. Although orchiectomy is a low-risk surgery, the psychological impact of
removing the testicles can be significant. The loss of testosterone also causes hot flashes, weight gain, loss of libido, enlargement of the breasts
(gynecomastia), impotence and
osteoporosis. GnRH agonists eventually cause the same side effects as orchiectomy but may cause worse symptoms at the
beginning of treatment. When GnRH agonists are first used, testosterone surges can lead to increased bone
pain from metastatic cancer, so antiandrogens
or abarelix are often added to blunt these side effects. Estrogens are not commonly used because they increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and
blood clots. The antiandrogens do not generally cause impotence and usually cause less loss of bone and muscle mass. Ketoconazole can cause liver
damage with prolonged use, and aminoglutethimide can cause skin rashes.
Palliative Care
Palliative care for advanced stage prostate cancer focuses on extending life and relieving the symptoms of metastatic disease. Chemotherapy may be
offered to slow disease progression and postpone symptoms. The most commonly used regimen combines the chemotherapeutic drug docetaxel with a
corticosteroid such as prednisone. Bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid have been shown to delay skeletal complications such as fractures or
the need for radiation therapy in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.
Bone
pain due to metastatic disease is treated with opioid pain relievers such as morphine and oxycodone. External beam radiation therapy directed at
bone metastases may provide pain relief. Injections of certain radioisotopes, such as strontium-89, phosphorus-32, or samarium-153, also target bone
metastases and may help relieve pain.
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)
HIFU for prostate cancer utilizes high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to ablate/destroy the tissue of the prostate. During the HIFU procedure,
sound waves are used to heat the prostate tissue thus destroying the cancerous cells. Essentially, ultrasonic waves are precisely focused on specific
areas of the prostate to eliminate the prostate
cancer with minimal risks of effecting other tissue or organs. Temperatures at the focal point of the
sound waves can exceed 100oC. In lay terms, the HIFU technology is similar to using a magnifying glass to burn a piece of paper by focusing sunlight
at a small precise point on the sheet. The ability to focus the ultrasonic waves leads to a relatively low occurrence of both incontinence and
impotence. (0.6% and 0-20%, respectively) According to international studies, when compared to other procedures, HIFU has a high success rate with
a reduced risk of side effects. Studies using the Sonablate 500 HIFU machine have shown that 94% of patients with a pretreatment PSA (Prostate Specific
Antigen) of less than 10g/ml were cancer-free after three years. However, many studies of HIFU were performed by manufacturers of HIFU devices, or
members of manufacturers' advisory panels.
HIFU was first used in the 1940’s and 1950’s in efforts to destroy tumors in the central nervous system. Since then, HIFU has been shown to be effective
at destroying malignant tissue in the brain, prostate, spleen, liver, kidney, breast, and bone. Today, the HIFU procedure for prostate cancer is
perfomed using a transrectal probe. This procedure has been performed for over ten years and is currently approved for use in Japan, Europe, Canada,
and parts of Central and South America.
Although not yet approved for use in the Unites States, many patients have received the HIFU procedure at facilities in Canada, and Central and South
America. Currently, therapy is available using the Sonablate 500 or the Ablatherm. The Sonablate 500 is designed by Focus Surgery of Indianapolis,
Indiana and is used in international HIFU centers around the world.
Prognosis
Prostate cancer rates are higher and prognosis poorer in Western societies than the rest of the world. Many of the risk factors for prostate cancer
are more prevalent in the Western world, including longer life expectancy and diets high in red meat and dairy products. Also, where there is more
access to screening programs, there is a higher detection rate. Prostate cancer is the ninth most common
cancer in the world, but is the number one
non-skin cancer in United States men. Prostate cancer affected eighteen percent of American men and caused death in three percent in 2005. In Japan,
death from prostate cancer was one-fifth to one-half the rates in the United States and Europe in the 1990s. In India in the 1990s, half of the
people with prostate cancer confined to the prostate died within ten years. African-American men have 50–60 times more prostate cancer and prostate
cancer deaths than men in Shanghai, China. In Nigeria, two percent of men develop prostate cancer and 64% of them are dead after two years.
In patients who undergo treatment, the most important clinical prognostic indicators of disease outcome are stage, pre-therapy PSA level and Gleason
score. In general, the higher the grade and the stage, the poorer the prognosis. Nomograms can be used to calculate the estimated risk of the individual
patient. The predictions are based on the experience of large groups of patients suffering from cancers at various stages.
Progression
In 1941, Charles Huggins reported that androgen ablation therapy causes regression of primary and metastatic androgen-dependent prostate cancer.
However, it is now known that 80–90% of prostate cancer patients develop androgen-independent tumors 12–33 months after androgen ablation therapy,
leading to a median overall survival of 23–37 months from the time of initiation of androgen ablation therapy. The actual mechanism contributes to
the progression of prostate cancer is not clear and may vary between individual patient. A few possible mechanisms have be proposed. Scientists
have established a few prostate cancer cell lines to investigate the mechanism involved in the progression of prostate cancer. LNCaP, PC-3, and DU-145
are commonly used prostate cancer cell lines. The LNCaP
cancer cell line was established from a human lymph node metastatic lesion of prostatic
adenocarcinoma. PC-3 and DU-145 cells were established from human prostatic adenocarcinoma metastatic to bone and to brain, respectively. LNCaP cells
express androgen receptor (AR), however, PC-3 and DU-145 cells express very little or no AR. AR, an androgen-activated transcription factor, belongs to
the steroid nuclear receptor family. Development of the prostate is dependent on androgen signaling mediated through AR, and AR is also important
during the development of prostate cancer. The proliferation of LNCaP cells is androgen-dependent but the proliferation of PC-3 and DU-145 cells is
androgen-insensitive.Elevation of AR expression is often observed in advanced prostate tumors in patients. Some androgen-independent LNCaP
sublines have been developed from the ATCC androgen-dependent LNCaP cells after androgen deprivation for study of prostate cancer progression. These
androgen-independent LNCaP cells have elevated AR expression and express prostate specific antigen upon androgen treatment. Androgens paradoxically
inhibit the proliferation of these androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Androgen at a concentration of 10-fold higher than the
physiological concentration has also been shown to cause growth suppression and reversion of androgen-independent prostate cancer xenografts or
androgen-independent prostate tumors derived in vivo model to an androgen-stimulated phenotype in athymic mice. These observation suggest the
possibility to use androgen to treat the development of relapsed androgen-independent prostate tumors in patients. Oral infusion of green tea
polyphenols, a potential alternative therapy for prostate cancer by natural compounds, has been shown to inhibit the development, progression, and
metastasis as well in autochthonous transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model, which spontaneously develops prostate cancer.
History
Although the prostate was first described by Venetian anatomist Niccolò Massa in 1536, and illustrated by Flemish anatomist Andreas Vesalius in 1538,
prostate cancer was not identified until 1853. Prostate cancer was initially considered a rare disease, probably because of shorter life expectancies
and poorer detection methods in the 19th century. The first treatments of prostate cancer were surgeries to relieve urinary obstruction. Removal of
the entire gland (radical perineal prostatectomy) was first performed in 1904 by Hugh H. Young at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Surgical removal of the
testes (orchiectomy) to treat prostate cancer was first performed in the 1890s, but with limited success. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
replaced radical prostatectomy for symptomatic relief of obstruction in the middle of the 20th century because it could better preserve penile erectile
function. Radical retropubic prostatectomy was developed in 1983 by Patrick Walsh.
This surgical approach allowed for removal of the prostate and lymph nodes with maintenance of penile function.
In 1941 Charles B. Huggins published studies in which he used estrogen to oppose testosterone production in men with metastatic prostate cancer. This
discovery of "chemical castration" won Huggins the 1966 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The role of the hormone GnRH in reproduction was
determined by Andrzej W. Schally and Roger Guillemin, who both won the 1977 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for this work. Receptor agonists,
such as leuprolide and goserelin, were subsequently developed and used to treat prostate cancer.
Radiation therapy for prostate cancer was first developed in the early 20th century and initially consisted of intraprostatic radium implants. External
beam radiation became more popular as stronger radiation sources became available in the middle of the 20th century. Brachytherapy with implanted seeds
was first described in 1983. Systemic chemotherapy for prostate cancer was first studied in the 1970s. The initial regimen of cyclophosphamide and
5-fluorouracil was quickly joined by multiple regimens using a host of other systemic chemotherapy drugs.
Miscellaneous Facts
Men were less likely to be hospitalized for prostate cancer treatment in 2004 than in 1997, according to the latest News and Numbers from the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality. Hospitalizations for treatment of the disease fell nearly 30 percent in those eight years. Prostate cancer is the
second-most common
cancer in men.
(adapted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostate_Cancer)
Authors: Venkitaraman R, Norman A, Woode-Amissah R, Fisher C, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, Huddart R, Khoo V, Thompson A, Parker C.
Academic Unit of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research (RV, RWA, DD, AH, RH, VK, CP).
PURPOSE: Active surveillance for early prostate cancer is a policy of close monitoring with radical treatment targeted at cases with evidence of disease
progression. There is no consensus on the need for or optimum timing of repeat biopsies as part of active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a
prospective cohort study of active surveillance 119 patients with untreated localized prostate cancer (T1/2a), prostate specific antigen less than
15 ng/ml, Gleason score 3 + 4 or less and 50% or less positive cores underwent repeat biopsy after 18 to 24 months. Histological disease progression
was defined as primary Gleason grade 4 or greater, greater than 50% positive cores or a Gleason score increase from 6 or less to 7 or greater. The risk
of histological disease progression was analyzed with respect to baseline clinical factors. RESULTS: Median patient age was 66 years and median initial
prostate specific antigen was 6.6 ng/ml. Histological disease progression was seen in 33 of 119 cases (28%). On multivariate analysis prostate specific
antigen density (p = 0.002) and maximum percent involvement of any core (p = 0.04) were significant independent determinants of histological disease
progression. Progression was seen in 22 of 40 cases (55%) with prostate specific antigen density 0.2 ng/ml/ml or greater and greater than 15% maximum
involvement of any core. Progression was seen in 2 of 33 cases (6%) with prostate specific antigen density less than 0.2 ng/ml/ml and 15% or less
maximum involvement of any core. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat biopsy should be an integral part of active surveillance for untreated localized prostate cancer.
Immediate repeat biopsy should be considered in patients who elect active surveillance but who have prostate specific antigen density greater than 0.2
ng/ml/ml. These findings must be validated in a cohort of patients with extended biopsies at diagnosis and followup.
Journal: J Urol. 2007 Jul 12
Authors: Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Siddiqui S, Bagniewski S, Bergstralh EJ, Karnes RJ, Frank I, Blute ML.
Department of Urology and Division of Biostatistics (SB, EJB), Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
PURPOSE: While the incidence of lymph node positive prostate cancer has decreased during the prostate specific antigen era, the optimal treatment of
these patients remains in question. We examined the impact of lymph node metastases on the outcome of patients following radical prostatectomy and
investigated prognostic factors that affect survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 507 men treated with radical prostatectomy between 1988 and
2001 who had lymph node positive disease. Of the 507 patients 455 (89.7%) were treated with adjuvant hormonal therapy. Median followup was 10.3 years
(IQR 6.1-13.5). Postoperative survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the impact of various clinicopathological factors on
outcome was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Ten-year
specific survival for patients with positive lymph
nodes was 85.8% with 56% of the men free from biochemical recurrence at last followup. On multivariate analysis pathological Gleason score 8-10
(p = 0.004), positive surgical margins (p = 0.016), nondiploid tumor ploidy (p = 0.023) and 2 or greater positive nodes (p = 0.001) were adverse
predictors of cancer specific survival. Tumor stage, year of surgery and total number of nodes removed did not significantly affect outcome. Adjuvant
hormonal therapy decreased the risk of biochemical recurrence (p <0.001) and local recurrence (p = 0.004) but it was not associated with systemic
progression (p = 0.4) or cancer specific survival (p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy may offer long-term survival to patients with lymph
node positive prostate cancer. Gleason score, margin status, tumor ploidy and the number of involved nodes predict survival, while the role of adjuvant
hormonal therapy continues to be defined.
Journal: J Urol. 2007 Jul 12
Authors: Miller J, Smith A, Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS.
Division of Urologic Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
PURPOSE: In the last few years there have been increasing claims that robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy decreases short-term morbidity
in patients undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer. However, there is surprisingly little objective evidence to support this point, which is
often used to market the procedure to patients. To address this issue we prospectively evaluated patients undergoing open and robotic assisted
laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at baseline and weekly through the postoperative period using a validated questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A
total of 162 men undergoing radical prostatectomy, including open radical prostatectomy in 120 and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
in 42, for clinically localized prostate cancer completed the SF-12trade mark, version 2 Physical and Mental Health Survey Acute Form preoperatively and
each week postoperatively for 6 weeks. Physical and Mental Component Scores were calculated from the questionnaires at each time point. Comparisons
between the 2 surgical approaches were made at each time point. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between the open and robotic assisted
laparoscopic radical prostatectomy groups with regard to patient age, clinical stage or preoperative prostate specific antigen. Mean surgical blood
loss was significantly higher in the open group compared to that in the robotic assisted laparoscopic group. Physical Component Scores in the robotic
assisted laparoscopic group were significantly higher than those in the open cohort beginning postoperative week 1 and extending through week 6. On
statistical extrapolation Physical Component Scores returned to baseline between weeks 5 and 6 postoperatively in the robotic assisted laparoscopic
group and between weeks 6 and 7 in the open group. Mental Component Score scores were not statistically different between the groups except
preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study helps prospectively define short-term health related quality of life in patients undergoing robotic assisted
laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy. Higher physical scores were seen in the robotic assisted laparoscopic group than the open group beginning
postoperative week 1 and continuing weekly throughout the 6-week study period. Physical Component Score scores returned to baseline sooner in the
robotic assisted laparoscopic group than in the open group.
Journal: J Urol. 2007 Jul 12
Authors: Malaeb BS, Rashid HH, Lotan Y, Khoddami SM, Shariat SF, Sagalowsky AI, McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Koeneman KS.
Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) as an option for treating men older than 70 years with organ confined
prostate cancer and to compare biochemical progression-free survival with younger cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 689 consecutive patients who
were treated with RRP from 1994 to 2002 for clinically localized prostate cancer were categorized into 3 different age groups: younger than 50 years
(n = 49), 50-70 years (n = 601), and older than 70 years (n = 39). Patients older than 70 years were healthy individuals for their age. Preoperative
and postoperative cancer-specific characteristics were compared among these 3 groups. RESULTS: There was no statistical significant difference among
the 3 age strata in terms of clinical parameters (prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, clinical stage, percent and number of positive biopsy
cores) and pathologic findings (surgical margin, lymph node status, extracapsular extension, lymphovascular invasion, and pathologic Gleason score).
The rate of seminal vesicle invasion and prostate volume increased with advancing age (P = 0.034 and P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression
analysis, age was not associated with seminal vesicle invasion. The 5-year prostate-specific antigen progression-free estimates for patients younger
than 50, 50-70, and older than 70 years were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69% to 96%), 82% (95% CI 78% to 86%), and 65% (95% CI 43% to 86%),
respectively (P = 0.349). The overall and cause-specific mortalities were not different. CONCLUSIONS: RRP could be considered a standard treatment
option in men older than 70 years with localized prostate cancer. Further studies are necessary to assess the survival benefit and health-related
quality of life after radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in patients older than 70 years.
Journal: Urol Oncol. 2007 Jul-Aug;25(4):291-7.
Authors: Romero S, Stanton G, Defelice J, Schreiber F, Rago R, Fishman M.
Florida Cancer Specialists, Ft. Myers, FL, 33901-8108, USA.
BACKGROUND: Responses to monotherapy corticosteroid or thalidomide have been described in prostate cancer, in chemotherapy naïve subjects. METHODS: A
total of 39 men with hormone refractory, metastatic prostate cancer who had progression during or after at least 1 conventional cytotoxic drug were
treated on a single-arm Phase II trial with dexamethasone, 0.75 mg twice a day plus thalidomide, 100-400 mg/day. RESULTS: Best-observed responses
included >50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction with no radiologic progression: 10 of 39 (26%; 95% confidence interval 13% to 42%). An
additional 14 of 39 had decreased PSA but then with radiologic or other progression by 12 weeks. Median progression-free survival was 84 days. Toxicity
appeared treatable; there were 5 nonfatal thromboses. There was 1 subject who had complete PSA and radiologic response; 4 responders tolerated treatment
without progression for more than 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: PSA responses were frequent. Mostly, these were not durable, but some lasted more than a year.
Further investigation on determinants of response durability for these or related compounds should be considered. The response rate of the present data
does not support Phase III testing of this regimen for this population.
Journal: Urol Oncol. 2007 Jul-Aug;25(4):284-90.
Authors: Darlington GA, Kreiger N, Lightfoot N, Purdham J, Sass-Kortsak A.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Associations between prostate cancer and dietary factors, physical activity and smoking were assessed based on data from a population-based case-control
study. The study was conducted among residents of northeastern Ontario. Cases were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry and diagnosed between 1995
and 1998 at ages 50 to 84 years (N=752). Male controls were identified from telephone listings and were frequency matched to cases on age (N=1,613).
Logistic regression analyses investigated history of diet, physical activity and smoking as potential risk factors. Tomato intake had a significant
positive association with prostate cancer risk for highest versus lowest quartiles (OR=1.6; 95 percent CI: 1.2-2.0). Associations were observed for
tomato or vegetable juices and ketchup (OR=1.5; 95 percent CI: 1.2-1.9; OR=1.2; 95 percent CI: 1.0-1.5, respectively). Neither other dietary variables
nor smoking were associated with prostate cancer risk. Strenuous physical activity by men in their early 50s was associated with reduced risk (OR=0.8;
95 percent CI: 0.6-0.9). While the recreational physical activity association was consistent with results from previous studies, the tomato products
association was not. Key words: case-control study, diet, physical activity, prostate cancer, smoking.
Journal: Chronic Dis Can. 2007;27(4):145-53.
Authors: Slovin SF, Ragupathi G, Fernandez C, Diani M, Jefferson MP, Wilton A, Kelly WK, Morris M, Solit D, Clausen H, Livingston P, Scher HI.
Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA, slovins@mskcc.org.
We have shown the immunogenicity and safety of synthetic carbohydrate vaccines when conjugated to the carrier keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and given
with the adjuvant, QS-21, in patients with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer. To determine whether immune response could be further enhanced with
stimulation by multiple antigens, a hexavalent vaccine was prepared using previously determined doses and administered in a Phase II setting to 30
high-risk patients. The hexavalent vaccine included GM2, Globo H, Lewis(y), glycosylated MUC-1-32mer and Tn and TF in a clustered formation, conjugated
to KLH and mixed with QS-21. Eight vaccinations were administered over 13 months. All 30 patients had significant elevations in antibody titers to at
least two of the six antigens; 22 patients had increased reactivity with FACS. These serologic responses were lower than that seen previously in patients
treated with the respective monovalent vaccines. The reciprocal median combined IgM and IgG antibody titers with ELISA against MUC1, Tn, TF, globo H and
GM2 for these 30 patients were 640, 80, 120, 40 and 0, compared to 1280, 640, 1280, 320 and 160 seen in patients receiving individual monovalent vaccines.
This hexavalent vaccine of synthetic "self" antigens broke immunologic tolerance against two or more antigens in all 30 vaccinated patients, was safe,
but antibody titers against several of the antigens were lower than those seen in individual monovalent trials. No impact on PSA slope was detected. We
address the relevance of the multivalent approach for prostate cancer treatment.
Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007 Jul 10
- Become a free member and get notified about studies in your area when they become available.
- Look over all of our current studies being conducted throughout the United States.