Expired Study
This study is not currently recruiting Study Participants on ClinicalConnection.com. If you would like to find active studies please search for clinical trials.

Madison, Wisconsin 53717


Purpose:

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the MEL 80 Excimer Laser is effective in the treatment of hyperopia, when used as part of the Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure.


Study summary:

LASIK has become one of the most common refractive eye procedures performed in the country. In the hyperopia procedure, a steepening occurs on the corneal surface, rather than the flattening procedure (myopic treatment). The surgeon will produce a standard keratomileusis flap using a microkeratome, exposing the corneal stroma. Recontouring under the flap is then accomplished by the removal of tissue from the stroma with the laser. This recontouring results in an altering of effective lens power of the central cornea, measured in diopters (D). The MEL 80 Excimer Laser System will be evaluated for its ability to create accurate and stable hyperopic refractive correction results.


Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria: - Naturally occurring hyperopia up to +6.0 D, with or without astigmatism of +0.50 D to +3.50 D at the spectacle plane, and MRSE ≤ +6.50 D; - Have ≤ 0.75 D of latent hyperopia as determined by the difference between the preoperative MRSE and CRSE; - A stable refraction for at least the last 12 months as documented by previous clinical records, i.e., the spherical and cylindrical portions of the manifest refraction have not progressed at a rate of more than 0.50 D during the year prior to the baseline examination in the eye to be treated; - Hard contact lens wearers must have two central keratometry readings and two manifest refractions taken at least one week apart that do not differ by more than 0.50 D; - Visual acuity correctable to at least 20/40 in both eyes; - Operative eye must be targeted for emmetropia; - At least 21 years of age; - Willing and able to return for scheduled follow up examinations for 24 months after surgery; - Sign and be given a copy of the written Informed Consent form. Exclusion Criteria: - A history of anterior segment pathology, including cataracts (in the operative eye); - Severe dry eye syndrome unresolved by treatment; - Residual, recurrent, active ocular or uncontrolled eyelid disease, corneal scars within the ablation zone or other corneal abnormality such as recurrent corneal erosion or severe basement membrane disease; - Ophthalmoscopic signs of keratoconus (or keratoconus suspect); - An ablation deeper than 250 microns from the corneal endothelium; - Irregular or unstable (distorted/not clear) corneal mires on central keratometry readings; - Blind in the fellow eye; - Undergone previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind in the operative eye(s), including any type of excimer laser surgery for either refractive or therapeutic purposes; - A history of ocular Herpes zoster or Herpes simplex keratitis; - A history of steroid-responsive rise in intraocular pressure, glaucoma, or preoperative IOP >21 mm Hg; - Diabetes, diagnosed autoimmune disease, connective tissue disease, or clinically significant atopic syndrome; - Immunocompromised or use chronic systemic corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapy; - Pregnant, lactating, or be of childbearing potential and not practicing a medically approved method of birth control; - A known sensitivity to planned study medications; - Participating in any other ophthalmic drug or device clinical trial during the time of this clinical investigation; - At risk for angle closure or for developing strabismus postoperatively. - For Fellow (Second) Eyes in Simultaneous Bilateral Treatment Procedures - 1. Flap complications during the first eye's surgery such as a free cap, partial flap, thin flap, or irregular flap. - 2. Epithelial defect exceeding 2 mm x 2 mm in dimension, or clinically significant debris in the interface between the flap and underlying stroma for the first eye. - 3. Severe blepharospasm in the first eye that may have prevented or impeded the completion of the keratectomy and/or the laser ablation procedure. - 4. Poor subject cooperation with instructions for the first eye's surgery and/or poor subject fixation on the laser fixation target. - 5. Aborted LASIK procedure in the first eye or PRK was performed in the first eye because LASIK was not possible.


Study is Available At:


Original ID:

MEL 80-2004-2


NCT ID:

NCT00762281


Secondary ID:


Study Acronym:


Brief Title:

Safety and Effectiveness Study of the MEL 80 Excimer Laser Using LASIK in the Treatment of Hyperopia


Official Title:

A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial To Evaluate The Safety And Effectiveness Of The MEL 80 Excimer Laser Using LASIK (Laser In Situ Keratomileusis) For The Correction Of ≤ +6.0 D Of Hyperopia With Or Without Astigmatism Of +0.50 D To +3.50 D And


Overall Status:

Completed


Study Phase:

N/A


Genders:

Both


Minimum Age:

21 Years


Maximum Age:

N/A


Quick Facts

Healthy Volunteers
Oversight Has DMC
Study Is FDA Regulated
Study Is Section 801
Has Expanded Access

Study Source:

Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.


Oversight Authority:

United States: Food and Drug Administration


Reasons Why Stopped:


Study Type:

Interventional


Study Design:

Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, I


Number of Arms:

1


Number of Groups:

0


Total Enrollment:

189


Enrollment Type:

Actual


Overall Contact Information

Official Name:Steven Dell, MD
Principal Investigator
Texan Eye Care

Study Dates

Start Date:July 2004
Completion Date:October 2008
Completion Type:Actual
Primary Completion Date:October 2006
Primary Completion Type:Actual
Verification Date:August 2012
Last Changed Date:August 9, 2012
First Received Date:September 26, 2008

Study Outcomes

Outcome Type:Secondary Outcome
Measure:Patient Symptoms: As measured by a subjective questionnaire, will be considered as a secondary safety variable.
Time Frame:Preoperative and Postoperative visits 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Safety Issues:True
Outcome Type:Secondary Outcome
Measure:Incidence of Complications
Time Frame:Postoperative visits
Safety Issues:True
Outcome Type:Secondary Outcome
Measure:Subject Satisfaction: As measured by a subjective questionnaire, and will be considered as a secondary efficacy variable.
Time Frame:Postoperative visits 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Safety Issues:False
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:Incidence of Adverse Events to occur in less 1% of eyes
Time Frame:Postoperative visits
Safety Issues:True
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:Less than 5% of eyes treated for sphere only should have a magnitude of postoperative manifest refractive astigmatism that varies from baseline cylinder by greater than 2.00 D at the postoperative interval at which stability has been established.
Time Frame:Point of stability
Safety Issues:True
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:Loss of more than 2 lines of BSCVA should occur in less than 5.0% of eyes.
Time Frame:Point of stability
Safety Issues:True
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:Distance BSCVA of worse than 20/40 at the postoperative interval at which stability has been established should occur in less than 1.0% of eyes that had a BSCVA of 20/20 or better before surgery.
Time Frame:Point of stability
Safety Issues:True
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:75% of eyes undergoing astigmatic treatment should be within ± 1.00 D of the attempted astigmatism correction by the point of stability.
Time Frame:Point of stability
Safety Issues:False
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:A minimum of 95% of eyes should have a change of < 1.00 D in manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) between 2 refractions performed at least 3 months apart, and the mean rate of MRSE change per month should be < 0.04 D.
Time Frame:Point of stability
Safety Issues:False
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:A minimum of 85% of eyes targeted for emmetropia should have an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better at the postoperative interval at which stability has been established.
Time Frame:Point of stability
Safety Issues:False
Outcome Type:Primary Outcome
Measure:At the point of stability, a minimum of 75% of eyes should have an achieved refraction within ± 1.00 D of the intended outcome, and at least 50% of eyes should be within ± 0.50 D of the intended outcome.
Time Frame:Point of stability
Safety Issues:False

Study Interventions

Intervention Type:Device
Name:MEL 80 Hyperopic LASIK Treatment
Description:Treatment of Hyperopic corrections ≤ +6.0 D with or without Astigmatism of +0.50 to +3.50 D and MRSE ≤ +6.50 D.
Arm Name:Treatment of Hyperopic LASIK

Study Arms

Study Arm Type:Other
Arm Name:Treatment of Hyperopic LASIK
Description:Treatment of Hyperopic corrections ≤ +6.0 D with or without Astigmatism of +0.50 to +3.50 D and MRSE ≤ +6.50 D.

Study Agencies

Agency Class:Industry
Agency Type:Lead Sponsor
Agency Name:Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.

Sample and Retention Information

There are no available Sample and Retention Information

Study References

There are no available Study References

Data Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

Date Processed: January 21, 2020

Modifications to this listing: Only selected fields are shown, please use the link below to view all information about this clinical trial.


This study is not currently recruiting Study Participants. The form below is not enabled.